基于模型和机器学习的故障诊断技术比较

Balyogi Mohan Dash, B. O. Bouamama, Mahdi Boukerdja, K. Pékpé
{"title":"基于模型和机器学习的故障诊断技术比较","authors":"Balyogi Mohan Dash, B. O. Bouamama, Mahdi Boukerdja, K. Pékpé","doi":"10.1109/MEPCON55441.2022.10021712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, there has been a lot of interest in Fault Detection and Isolation (FDI) for systems. Model-based methods and Machine Learning (ML)-based approaches have been extensively developed to detect and identify specific faults by taking into consideration, respectively, the mathematical description of the monitored process and the statistical model constructed from historical data. Recently, studies have been conducted to combine both approaches to improve FDI performance. This study provides a side-by-side comparison of both approaches on the same system, which will aid in determining the best way to combine both approaches to create a hybrid FDI. First, the current state of the art in model-based, ML-based, and hybrid FDI is reviewed. Second, the detailed experimental setup and principles of both FDI approaches are discussed. The FDI of an actual Storage Device (SD) utilized in a green hydrogen production platform is then performed using both methodologies. Finally, it is stated that while both approaches have advantages and disadvantages, they can be combined to complement each other and improve the FDI performance.","PeriodicalId":174878,"journal":{"name":"2022 23rd International Middle East Power Systems Conference (MEPCON)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Model-Based and Machine Learning Techniques for Fault Diagnosis\",\"authors\":\"Balyogi Mohan Dash, B. O. Bouamama, Mahdi Boukerdja, K. Pékpé\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MEPCON55441.2022.10021712\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, there has been a lot of interest in Fault Detection and Isolation (FDI) for systems. Model-based methods and Machine Learning (ML)-based approaches have been extensively developed to detect and identify specific faults by taking into consideration, respectively, the mathematical description of the monitored process and the statistical model constructed from historical data. Recently, studies have been conducted to combine both approaches to improve FDI performance. This study provides a side-by-side comparison of both approaches on the same system, which will aid in determining the best way to combine both approaches to create a hybrid FDI. First, the current state of the art in model-based, ML-based, and hybrid FDI is reviewed. Second, the detailed experimental setup and principles of both FDI approaches are discussed. The FDI of an actual Storage Device (SD) utilized in a green hydrogen production platform is then performed using both methodologies. Finally, it is stated that while both approaches have advantages and disadvantages, they can be combined to complement each other and improve the FDI performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":174878,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 23rd International Middle East Power Systems Conference (MEPCON)\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 23rd International Middle East Power Systems Conference (MEPCON)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MEPCON55441.2022.10021712\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 23rd International Middle East Power Systems Conference (MEPCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MEPCON55441.2022.10021712","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,系统故障检测与隔离(FDI)受到了广泛关注。基于模型的方法和基于机器学习(ML)的方法已经得到了广泛的发展,分别通过考虑监测过程的数学描述和从历史数据构建的统计模型来检测和识别特定的故障。最近,一些研究将这两种方法结合起来,以改善外国直接投资绩效。本研究对同一制度下的两种方法进行了并排比较,这将有助于确定将两种方法结合起来创造混合型外国直接投资的最佳方式。首先,回顾了基于模型、基于机器学习和混合FDI的现状。其次,详细讨论了两种FDI方法的实验设置和原理。然后使用这两种方法对绿色制氢平台中使用的实际存储设备(SD)进行FDI。最后指出,虽然两种方法各有优缺点,但可以将它们结合起来,相互补充,提高FDI绩效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison of Model-Based and Machine Learning Techniques for Fault Diagnosis
In recent years, there has been a lot of interest in Fault Detection and Isolation (FDI) for systems. Model-based methods and Machine Learning (ML)-based approaches have been extensively developed to detect and identify specific faults by taking into consideration, respectively, the mathematical description of the monitored process and the statistical model constructed from historical data. Recently, studies have been conducted to combine both approaches to improve FDI performance. This study provides a side-by-side comparison of both approaches on the same system, which will aid in determining the best way to combine both approaches to create a hybrid FDI. First, the current state of the art in model-based, ML-based, and hybrid FDI is reviewed. Second, the detailed experimental setup and principles of both FDI approaches are discussed. The FDI of an actual Storage Device (SD) utilized in a green hydrogen production platform is then performed using both methodologies. Finally, it is stated that while both approaches have advantages and disadvantages, they can be combined to complement each other and improve the FDI performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信