评估方法在实践中的经验与挑战:个案研究

Simone Kriglstein, M. Pohl, Nikolaus Suchy, J. Gärtner, T. Gschwandtner, S. Miksch
{"title":"评估方法在实践中的经验与挑战:个案研究","authors":"Simone Kriglstein, M. Pohl, Nikolaus Suchy, J. Gärtner, T. Gschwandtner, S. Miksch","doi":"10.1145/2669557.2669571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of information visualizations for companies poses specific challenges, especially for evaluation processes. It is advisable to test these visualizations under realistic circumstances. Because of various constraints, this can be quite difficult. In this paper, we discuss three different methods which can be used to conduct evaluations in companies. These methods are appropriate for different stages in the software life cycle (design phase, development, deployment) and reflect an iterative approach in evaluation. Based on an overview of available evaluation methods we argue that this combination of fairly lightweight methods is especially appropriate for evaluations of information visualizations in companies. These methods complement each other and emphasize different aspects of the evaluation. Based on this case study, we try to generalize our lessons learned from our experiences of conducting evaluations in this context.","PeriodicalId":179584,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experiences and challenges with evaluation methods in practice: a case study\",\"authors\":\"Simone Kriglstein, M. Pohl, Nikolaus Suchy, J. Gärtner, T. Gschwandtner, S. Miksch\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2669557.2669571\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The development of information visualizations for companies poses specific challenges, especially for evaluation processes. It is advisable to test these visualizations under realistic circumstances. Because of various constraints, this can be quite difficult. In this paper, we discuss three different methods which can be used to conduct evaluations in companies. These methods are appropriate for different stages in the software life cycle (design phase, development, deployment) and reflect an iterative approach in evaluation. Based on an overview of available evaluation methods we argue that this combination of fairly lightweight methods is especially appropriate for evaluations of information visualizations in companies. These methods complement each other and emphasize different aspects of the evaluation. Based on this case study, we try to generalize our lessons learned from our experiences of conducting evaluations in this context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":179584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2669557.2669571\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2669557.2669571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

公司信息可视化的发展提出了具体的挑战,特别是对评估过程。在现实环境下测试这些可视化效果是明智的。由于各种限制,这可能相当困难。在本文中,我们讨论了三种不同的方法,可以用来在公司进行评估。这些方法适用于软件生命周期中的不同阶段(设计阶段、开发阶段、部署阶段),并且反映了评估中的迭代方法。基于对现有评估方法的概述,我们认为这种相当轻量级的方法组合特别适合于公司信息可视化的评估。这些方法相辅相成,强调评价的不同方面。在此案例研究的基础上,我们试图总结在此背景下进行评估的经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experiences and challenges with evaluation methods in practice: a case study
The development of information visualizations for companies poses specific challenges, especially for evaluation processes. It is advisable to test these visualizations under realistic circumstances. Because of various constraints, this can be quite difficult. In this paper, we discuss three different methods which can be used to conduct evaluations in companies. These methods are appropriate for different stages in the software life cycle (design phase, development, deployment) and reflect an iterative approach in evaluation. Based on an overview of available evaluation methods we argue that this combination of fairly lightweight methods is especially appropriate for evaluations of information visualizations in companies. These methods complement each other and emphasize different aspects of the evaluation. Based on this case study, we try to generalize our lessons learned from our experiences of conducting evaluations in this context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信