高峰负荷定价理论:最后说明

G. W. Wilson
{"title":"高峰负荷定价理论:最后说明","authors":"G. W. Wilson","doi":"10.2307/3003080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This note presents a formal reconciliation of two approaches to the analysis of peak and off-peak pricing. It argues that the differences reside in varying conceptions of the time period over which costs and revenues are calculated. Both versions yield formally correct solutions so that no substantive problems emerge, as noted in the reconciliation. However, varying rates of production, implicit in the two approaches, may violate the cost linearity assumptions made in both and hence vitiate the traditional conclusions.","PeriodicalId":177728,"journal":{"name":"The Bell Journal of Economics","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Theory of Peak-Load Pricing: A Final Note\",\"authors\":\"G. W. Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/3003080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This note presents a formal reconciliation of two approaches to the analysis of peak and off-peak pricing. It argues that the differences reside in varying conceptions of the time period over which costs and revenues are calculated. Both versions yield formally correct solutions so that no substantive problems emerge, as noted in the reconciliation. However, varying rates of production, implicit in the two approaches, may violate the cost linearity assumptions made in both and hence vitiate the traditional conclusions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":177728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Bell Journal of Economics\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Bell Journal of Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/3003080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bell Journal of Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3003080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

摘要

本文介绍了高峰和非高峰定价分析的两种方法的正式调和。它认为,差异在于对计算成本和收入的时间周期的不同概念。正如对账中所指出的那样,两个版本都提出了形式上正确的解决办法,因此没有出现实质性问题。然而,在这两种方法中隐含的不同的生产率可能会违反两者所做的成本线性假设,从而破坏传统的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Theory of Peak-Load Pricing: A Final Note
This note presents a formal reconciliation of two approaches to the analysis of peak and off-peak pricing. It argues that the differences reside in varying conceptions of the time period over which costs and revenues are calculated. Both versions yield formally correct solutions so that no substantive problems emerge, as noted in the reconciliation. However, varying rates of production, implicit in the two approaches, may violate the cost linearity assumptions made in both and hence vitiate the traditional conclusions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信