数字法医使用电子证据的边界条件及法医反分析的必要性

M. Losavio, Musa Hindi, Roman V Yampolskiy, D. Keeling
{"title":"数字法医使用电子证据的边界条件及法医反分析的必要性","authors":"M. Losavio, Musa Hindi, Roman V Yampolskiy, D. Keeling","doi":"10.1109/SADFE.2011.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Network and Digital Forensics provide information about electronic activity in new, sometimes unprecedented forms. These new forms offer new, powerful tactical tools for investigations of electronic malfeasance when incorporated under traditional legal regulation of state power, particular that of Fourth Amendment limitations on police searches and seizures under the U.S. Constitution. These tactical tools raise issues of public policy and privacy that may raise concerns about the proper police oversight of civil society. How those issues are resolved will define personal privacy, autonomy and dignity in the 21st digital century.","PeriodicalId":264200,"journal":{"name":"2011 Sixth IEEE International Workshop on Systematic Approaches to Digital Forensic Engineering","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Boundary Conditions for the Digital Forensic Use of Electronic Evidence and The Need for Forensic Counter-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"M. Losavio, Musa Hindi, Roman V Yampolskiy, D. Keeling\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SADFE.2011.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Network and Digital Forensics provide information about electronic activity in new, sometimes unprecedented forms. These new forms offer new, powerful tactical tools for investigations of electronic malfeasance when incorporated under traditional legal regulation of state power, particular that of Fourth Amendment limitations on police searches and seizures under the U.S. Constitution. These tactical tools raise issues of public policy and privacy that may raise concerns about the proper police oversight of civil society. How those issues are resolved will define personal privacy, autonomy and dignity in the 21st digital century.\",\"PeriodicalId\":264200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 Sixth IEEE International Workshop on Systematic Approaches to Digital Forensic Engineering\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 Sixth IEEE International Workshop on Systematic Approaches to Digital Forensic Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SADFE.2011.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 Sixth IEEE International Workshop on Systematic Approaches to Digital Forensic Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SADFE.2011.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

网络和数字取证以新的,有时是前所未有的形式提供有关电子活动的信息。这些新表格为调查电子渎职行为提供了新的、强大的战术工具,如果将其纳入国家权力的传统法律规定,特别是美国宪法第四修正案对警察搜查和扣押的限制。这些战术工具引发了公共政策和隐私问题,可能引发人们对警察对公民社会的适当监督的担忧。如何解决这些问题将决定21世纪的个人隐私、自主和尊严。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Boundary Conditions for the Digital Forensic Use of Electronic Evidence and The Need for Forensic Counter-Analysis
Network and Digital Forensics provide information about electronic activity in new, sometimes unprecedented forms. These new forms offer new, powerful tactical tools for investigations of electronic malfeasance when incorporated under traditional legal regulation of state power, particular that of Fourth Amendment limitations on police searches and seizures under the U.S. Constitution. These tactical tools raise issues of public policy and privacy that may raise concerns about the proper police oversight of civil society. How those issues are resolved will define personal privacy, autonomy and dignity in the 21st digital century.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信