在约翰教派主义中来自天堂的人

W. Meeks
{"title":"在约翰教派主义中来自天堂的人","authors":"W. Meeks","doi":"10.2307/3262920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"THE uniqueness of the Fourth Gospel in early Christian literature consists above all in the special patterns of language which it uses to describe Jesus Christ. Fundamental among these patterns is the description of Jesus as the one who has descended from heaven and, at the end of his mission which constitutes a krisis for the whole world, reascends to the Father. Not the least of Rudolf Bultmann's enduring contributions to Johannine studies was his recognition and insistence that any attempt to solve the \"Johannine puzzle\" must begin with this picture of the descending/ascending redeemer. Moreover, he saw that it is not simply a question of explaining the concept \"pre-existence,\" but rather of perceiving the origin and function of a myth. The solution could not be found, therefore, by comparisons with philosophical developments in the hellenistic schools, such as the long-favored logos spermatikos of the Stoics, or its adaptation by middle Platonists or Alexandrian Jews. Myths have a logic of their own, which is not identical with the logic of the philosophers.1 Nevertheless, Bultmann's own proposed solution has not commanded general assent. To be sure, his observation that the closest extant analogies to the Johannine myth are to be found in the literature of gnostic movements stands firm and has been reinforced by more recent discoveries. The problem comes in assessing the very important differences between the typical gnostic myths and that of John, and therefore the direction of the relationship between the two patterns. Perhaps the most important difference, which Bultmann did not fail to notice, is the fact that in gnostic myths most comparable with the Johannine pattern the redeemer's descent and ascent parallel the fate and hope of the human essence (soul, pneuma, seed, or the like), while in the Fourth Gospel there is no such analogia entis between redeemer and redeemed. Bultmann's hypothesis is that the typical gnostic myth was deliberately modified by the fourth evangelist,","PeriodicalId":361042,"journal":{"name":"In Search of the Early Christians","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1972-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"83","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE MAN FROM HEAVEN IN JOHANNINE SECTARIANISM\",\"authors\":\"W. Meeks\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/3262920\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"THE uniqueness of the Fourth Gospel in early Christian literature consists above all in the special patterns of language which it uses to describe Jesus Christ. Fundamental among these patterns is the description of Jesus as the one who has descended from heaven and, at the end of his mission which constitutes a krisis for the whole world, reascends to the Father. Not the least of Rudolf Bultmann's enduring contributions to Johannine studies was his recognition and insistence that any attempt to solve the \\\"Johannine puzzle\\\" must begin with this picture of the descending/ascending redeemer. Moreover, he saw that it is not simply a question of explaining the concept \\\"pre-existence,\\\" but rather of perceiving the origin and function of a myth. The solution could not be found, therefore, by comparisons with philosophical developments in the hellenistic schools, such as the long-favored logos spermatikos of the Stoics, or its adaptation by middle Platonists or Alexandrian Jews. Myths have a logic of their own, which is not identical with the logic of the philosophers.1 Nevertheless, Bultmann's own proposed solution has not commanded general assent. To be sure, his observation that the closest extant analogies to the Johannine myth are to be found in the literature of gnostic movements stands firm and has been reinforced by more recent discoveries. The problem comes in assessing the very important differences between the typical gnostic myths and that of John, and therefore the direction of the relationship between the two patterns. Perhaps the most important difference, which Bultmann did not fail to notice, is the fact that in gnostic myths most comparable with the Johannine pattern the redeemer's descent and ascent parallel the fate and hope of the human essence (soul, pneuma, seed, or the like), while in the Fourth Gospel there is no such analogia entis between redeemer and redeemed. Bultmann's hypothesis is that the typical gnostic myth was deliberately modified by the fourth evangelist,\",\"PeriodicalId\":361042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"In Search of the Early Christians\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1972-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"83\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"In Search of the Early Christians\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/3262920\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In Search of the Early Christians","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3262920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 83

摘要

在早期基督教文学中,第四部福音书的独特性首先在于它用来描述耶稣基督的特殊语言模式。在这些模式中,最基本的是将耶稣描述为一个从天上降下来的人,在他对整个世界构成危机的使命结束时,上升到天父那里。Rudolf Bultmann对约翰研究的持久贡献中,最重要的一点是他认识到并坚持认为,任何解决“约翰之谜”的尝试都必须从这幅下行/上升的救世主的图片开始。此外,他看到这不仅仅是一个解释“前存在”概念的问题,而是一个感知神话起源和功能的问题。因此,通过与希腊化学派的哲学发展进行比较,例如斯多葛学派长期青睐的逻各斯的精子,或中期柏拉图主义者或亚历山大犹太人对其的改编,无法找到解决办法。神话有自己的逻辑,这与哲学家的逻辑是不相同的然而,布尔特曼自己提出的解决方案并没有得到普遍认可。可以肯定的是,他认为现存的最接近约翰神话的类比是在诺斯替主义运动的文献中找到的,这一观点是坚定的,并且被最近的发现所加强。问题在于评估典型的诺斯替神话和约翰神话之间的重要区别,以及这两种模式之间关系的方向。也许最重要的区别,也是Bultmann没有注意到的,是这样一个事实,在诺斯替神话中,救赎者的下降和上升与约翰模式最相似,与人类本质(灵魂,气场,种子,或类似的)的命运和希望相似,而在第四福音中,救赎者和被救赎者之间没有类似的实体。Bultmann的假设是,典型的诺斯替神话被第四福音传道者故意修改了,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE MAN FROM HEAVEN IN JOHANNINE SECTARIANISM
THE uniqueness of the Fourth Gospel in early Christian literature consists above all in the special patterns of language which it uses to describe Jesus Christ. Fundamental among these patterns is the description of Jesus as the one who has descended from heaven and, at the end of his mission which constitutes a krisis for the whole world, reascends to the Father. Not the least of Rudolf Bultmann's enduring contributions to Johannine studies was his recognition and insistence that any attempt to solve the "Johannine puzzle" must begin with this picture of the descending/ascending redeemer. Moreover, he saw that it is not simply a question of explaining the concept "pre-existence," but rather of perceiving the origin and function of a myth. The solution could not be found, therefore, by comparisons with philosophical developments in the hellenistic schools, such as the long-favored logos spermatikos of the Stoics, or its adaptation by middle Platonists or Alexandrian Jews. Myths have a logic of their own, which is not identical with the logic of the philosophers.1 Nevertheless, Bultmann's own proposed solution has not commanded general assent. To be sure, his observation that the closest extant analogies to the Johannine myth are to be found in the literature of gnostic movements stands firm and has been reinforced by more recent discoveries. The problem comes in assessing the very important differences between the typical gnostic myths and that of John, and therefore the direction of the relationship between the two patterns. Perhaps the most important difference, which Bultmann did not fail to notice, is the fact that in gnostic myths most comparable with the Johannine pattern the redeemer's descent and ascent parallel the fate and hope of the human essence (soul, pneuma, seed, or the like), while in the Fourth Gospel there is no such analogia entis between redeemer and redeemed. Bultmann's hypothesis is that the typical gnostic myth was deliberately modified by the fourth evangelist,
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信