WiFi有助于定义无线服务的相关市场

ERN: Monopoly Pub Date : 2018-10-03 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.3260271
Harold W. Furchtgott-Roth
{"title":"WiFi有助于定义无线服务的相关市场","authors":"Harold W. Furchtgott-Roth","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3260271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) has recognized that WiFi plays an increasingly important role as a competitor to the services offered by the mobile wireless industry, including when evaluating the state of competition in the mobile wireless marketplace. When reviewing proposed mergers, however, the FCC relies on a product market definition, “mobile telephony/broadband services,” that has been unchanged for approximately a decade and that does not account for the changed role of WiFi in the competitive marketplace during this time. Notably, the FCC continues to rely on this market definition without undertaking any particular analysis and without the support of any empirical evidence. Since the FCC adopted its market definition: (1) the choice of WiFi has become a clear reflection of how Americans use wireless devices; (2) market conditions for wireless services have changed rapidly; (3) more data has migrated to WiFi offload — transmitting wireless data to a WiFi network — than has remained on the cellular networks, and most wireless services are used in both nomadic and fixed environments; (4) WiFi capabilities in wireless devices have evolved and become ubiquitous; (6) new technologies have not appeared to lessen demand for WiFi; (7) cable providers are challenging wireless carriers with WiFi offload and wireless services; and (8) consumers have become sensitive to price and quality in choosing between cellular services or WiFi. When the use of WiFi for consumer data offload is examined, a hypothetical monopolist may reveal that “mobile telephony/broadband services” are not a separate market. \nThe FCC’s market definition was first adopted in 2008, when 3G technologies were first being deployed and 4G was only on the planning boards. Today, the technologies of 2008, and the associated market definitions, are outdated. Instead, new 5G technologies are being deployed. In this context, the FCC’s reliance on an outdated market definition results in an inaccurate understanding of competition in the market. Before conducting competitive analyses of the mobile marketplace, the FCC should carefully examine consumer choices of communications services and develop market definitions that reflect current technologies and consumer practices. WiFi, and the businesses that provide it, likely discipline prices of wireless services and are part of the same economic market.","PeriodicalId":142139,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Monopoly","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"WiFi Helps Define the Relevant Market for Wireless Services\",\"authors\":\"Harold W. Furchtgott-Roth\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.3260271\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) has recognized that WiFi plays an increasingly important role as a competitor to the services offered by the mobile wireless industry, including when evaluating the state of competition in the mobile wireless marketplace. When reviewing proposed mergers, however, the FCC relies on a product market definition, “mobile telephony/broadband services,” that has been unchanged for approximately a decade and that does not account for the changed role of WiFi in the competitive marketplace during this time. Notably, the FCC continues to rely on this market definition without undertaking any particular analysis and without the support of any empirical evidence. Since the FCC adopted its market definition: (1) the choice of WiFi has become a clear reflection of how Americans use wireless devices; (2) market conditions for wireless services have changed rapidly; (3) more data has migrated to WiFi offload — transmitting wireless data to a WiFi network — than has remained on the cellular networks, and most wireless services are used in both nomadic and fixed environments; (4) WiFi capabilities in wireless devices have evolved and become ubiquitous; (6) new technologies have not appeared to lessen demand for WiFi; (7) cable providers are challenging wireless carriers with WiFi offload and wireless services; and (8) consumers have become sensitive to price and quality in choosing between cellular services or WiFi. When the use of WiFi for consumer data offload is examined, a hypothetical monopolist may reveal that “mobile telephony/broadband services” are not a separate market. \\nThe FCC’s market definition was first adopted in 2008, when 3G technologies were first being deployed and 4G was only on the planning boards. Today, the technologies of 2008, and the associated market definitions, are outdated. Instead, new 5G technologies are being deployed. In this context, the FCC’s reliance on an outdated market definition results in an inaccurate understanding of competition in the market. Before conducting competitive analyses of the mobile marketplace, the FCC should carefully examine consumer choices of communications services and develop market definitions that reflect current technologies and consumer practices. WiFi, and the businesses that provide it, likely discipline prices of wireless services and are part of the same economic market.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Monopoly\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Monopoly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3260271\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Monopoly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3260271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国联邦通信委员会(“FCC”)已经认识到,作为移动无线行业提供的服务的竞争者,WiFi扮演着越来越重要的角色,包括在评估移动无线市场的竞争状态时。然而,在审查拟议的合并时,FCC依赖于一个产品市场定义,即“移动电话/宽带服务”,这一定义在大约10年的时间里一直没有改变,并且没有考虑到WiFi在这一时期竞争激烈的市场中角色的变化。值得注意的是,FCC继续依赖这一市场定义,而没有进行任何特定的分析,也没有任何经验证据的支持。自FCC通过其市场定义以来:(1)WiFi的选择已经成为美国人如何使用无线设备的清晰反映;(2)无线服务的市场环境变化迅速;(3)更多的数据迁移到WiFi卸载(将无线数据传输到WiFi网络),而不是留在蜂窝网络上,大多数无线服务既用于游牧环境,也用于固定环境;(4)无线设备的WiFi功能不断发展,变得无处不在;(6)新技术并未减少对WiFi的需求;(7)有线电视提供商正以WiFi卸载和无线服务挑战无线运营商;(8)消费者在选择手机服务还是WiFi服务时对价格和质量变得敏感。当对使用WiFi进行消费者数据卸载进行调查时,一个假设的垄断者可能会揭示“移动电话/宽带服务”不是一个独立的市场。美国联邦通信委员会的市场定义最早是在2008年采用的,当时3G技术刚刚开始部署,4G只是在规划委员会上。今天,2008年的技术和相关的市场定义已经过时了。相反,新的5G技术正在部署。在这种情况下,FCC对过时的市场定义的依赖导致了对市场竞争的不准确理解。在对移动市场进行竞争分析之前,FCC应该仔细检查消费者对通信服务的选择,并制定反映当前技术和消费者实践的市场定义。WiFi和提供WiFi的企业可能会约束无线服务的价格,它们属于同一个经济市场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
WiFi Helps Define the Relevant Market for Wireless Services
The Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) has recognized that WiFi plays an increasingly important role as a competitor to the services offered by the mobile wireless industry, including when evaluating the state of competition in the mobile wireless marketplace. When reviewing proposed mergers, however, the FCC relies on a product market definition, “mobile telephony/broadband services,” that has been unchanged for approximately a decade and that does not account for the changed role of WiFi in the competitive marketplace during this time. Notably, the FCC continues to rely on this market definition without undertaking any particular analysis and without the support of any empirical evidence. Since the FCC adopted its market definition: (1) the choice of WiFi has become a clear reflection of how Americans use wireless devices; (2) market conditions for wireless services have changed rapidly; (3) more data has migrated to WiFi offload — transmitting wireless data to a WiFi network — than has remained on the cellular networks, and most wireless services are used in both nomadic and fixed environments; (4) WiFi capabilities in wireless devices have evolved and become ubiquitous; (6) new technologies have not appeared to lessen demand for WiFi; (7) cable providers are challenging wireless carriers with WiFi offload and wireless services; and (8) consumers have become sensitive to price and quality in choosing between cellular services or WiFi. When the use of WiFi for consumer data offload is examined, a hypothetical monopolist may reveal that “mobile telephony/broadband services” are not a separate market. The FCC’s market definition was first adopted in 2008, when 3G technologies were first being deployed and 4G was only on the planning boards. Today, the technologies of 2008, and the associated market definitions, are outdated. Instead, new 5G technologies are being deployed. In this context, the FCC’s reliance on an outdated market definition results in an inaccurate understanding of competition in the market. Before conducting competitive analyses of the mobile marketplace, the FCC should carefully examine consumer choices of communications services and develop market definitions that reflect current technologies and consumer practices. WiFi, and the businesses that provide it, likely discipline prices of wireless services and are part of the same economic market.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信