{"title":"WiFi有助于定义无线服务的相关市场","authors":"Harold W. Furchtgott-Roth","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3260271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) has recognized that WiFi plays an increasingly important role as a competitor to the services offered by the mobile wireless industry, including when evaluating the state of competition in the mobile wireless marketplace. When reviewing proposed mergers, however, the FCC relies on a product market definition, “mobile telephony/broadband services,” that has been unchanged for approximately a decade and that does not account for the changed role of WiFi in the competitive marketplace during this time. Notably, the FCC continues to rely on this market definition without undertaking any particular analysis and without the support of any empirical evidence. Since the FCC adopted its market definition: (1) the choice of WiFi has become a clear reflection of how Americans use wireless devices; (2) market conditions for wireless services have changed rapidly; (3) more data has migrated to WiFi offload — transmitting wireless data to a WiFi network — than has remained on the cellular networks, and most wireless services are used in both nomadic and fixed environments; (4) WiFi capabilities in wireless devices have evolved and become ubiquitous; (6) new technologies have not appeared to lessen demand for WiFi; (7) cable providers are challenging wireless carriers with WiFi offload and wireless services; and (8) consumers have become sensitive to price and quality in choosing between cellular services or WiFi. When the use of WiFi for consumer data offload is examined, a hypothetical monopolist may reveal that “mobile telephony/broadband services” are not a separate market. \nThe FCC’s market definition was first adopted in 2008, when 3G technologies were first being deployed and 4G was only on the planning boards. Today, the technologies of 2008, and the associated market definitions, are outdated. Instead, new 5G technologies are being deployed. In this context, the FCC’s reliance on an outdated market definition results in an inaccurate understanding of competition in the market. Before conducting competitive analyses of the mobile marketplace, the FCC should carefully examine consumer choices of communications services and develop market definitions that reflect current technologies and consumer practices. WiFi, and the businesses that provide it, likely discipline prices of wireless services and are part of the same economic market.","PeriodicalId":142139,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Monopoly","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"WiFi Helps Define the Relevant Market for Wireless Services\",\"authors\":\"Harold W. Furchtgott-Roth\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.3260271\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) has recognized that WiFi plays an increasingly important role as a competitor to the services offered by the mobile wireless industry, including when evaluating the state of competition in the mobile wireless marketplace. When reviewing proposed mergers, however, the FCC relies on a product market definition, “mobile telephony/broadband services,” that has been unchanged for approximately a decade and that does not account for the changed role of WiFi in the competitive marketplace during this time. Notably, the FCC continues to rely on this market definition without undertaking any particular analysis and without the support of any empirical evidence. Since the FCC adopted its market definition: (1) the choice of WiFi has become a clear reflection of how Americans use wireless devices; (2) market conditions for wireless services have changed rapidly; (3) more data has migrated to WiFi offload — transmitting wireless data to a WiFi network — than has remained on the cellular networks, and most wireless services are used in both nomadic and fixed environments; (4) WiFi capabilities in wireless devices have evolved and become ubiquitous; (6) new technologies have not appeared to lessen demand for WiFi; (7) cable providers are challenging wireless carriers with WiFi offload and wireless services; and (8) consumers have become sensitive to price and quality in choosing between cellular services or WiFi. When the use of WiFi for consumer data offload is examined, a hypothetical monopolist may reveal that “mobile telephony/broadband services” are not a separate market. \\nThe FCC’s market definition was first adopted in 2008, when 3G technologies were first being deployed and 4G was only on the planning boards. Today, the technologies of 2008, and the associated market definitions, are outdated. Instead, new 5G technologies are being deployed. In this context, the FCC’s reliance on an outdated market definition results in an inaccurate understanding of competition in the market. Before conducting competitive analyses of the mobile marketplace, the FCC should carefully examine consumer choices of communications services and develop market definitions that reflect current technologies and consumer practices. WiFi, and the businesses that provide it, likely discipline prices of wireless services and are part of the same economic market.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Monopoly\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Monopoly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3260271\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Monopoly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3260271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
WiFi Helps Define the Relevant Market for Wireless Services
The Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) has recognized that WiFi plays an increasingly important role as a competitor to the services offered by the mobile wireless industry, including when evaluating the state of competition in the mobile wireless marketplace. When reviewing proposed mergers, however, the FCC relies on a product market definition, “mobile telephony/broadband services,” that has been unchanged for approximately a decade and that does not account for the changed role of WiFi in the competitive marketplace during this time. Notably, the FCC continues to rely on this market definition without undertaking any particular analysis and without the support of any empirical evidence. Since the FCC adopted its market definition: (1) the choice of WiFi has become a clear reflection of how Americans use wireless devices; (2) market conditions for wireless services have changed rapidly; (3) more data has migrated to WiFi offload — transmitting wireless data to a WiFi network — than has remained on the cellular networks, and most wireless services are used in both nomadic and fixed environments; (4) WiFi capabilities in wireless devices have evolved and become ubiquitous; (6) new technologies have not appeared to lessen demand for WiFi; (7) cable providers are challenging wireless carriers with WiFi offload and wireless services; and (8) consumers have become sensitive to price and quality in choosing between cellular services or WiFi. When the use of WiFi for consumer data offload is examined, a hypothetical monopolist may reveal that “mobile telephony/broadband services” are not a separate market.
The FCC’s market definition was first adopted in 2008, when 3G technologies were first being deployed and 4G was only on the planning boards. Today, the technologies of 2008, and the associated market definitions, are outdated. Instead, new 5G technologies are being deployed. In this context, the FCC’s reliance on an outdated market definition results in an inaccurate understanding of competition in the market. Before conducting competitive analyses of the mobile marketplace, the FCC should carefully examine consumer choices of communications services and develop market definitions that reflect current technologies and consumer practices. WiFi, and the businesses that provide it, likely discipline prices of wireless services and are part of the same economic market.