{"title":"雷达探测中的删节视频集成","authors":"N. Levanon","doi":"10.1109/RADAR.1990.201107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The performances of the classical video integrator and the well-known binary integrator (which can also be called an order statistics integrator) are compared with that of a new integrator, called the censored video integrator (CVI), for a Swerling II target in Gaussian noise. CVI performs sorting, censoring, and nonuniform weighted averaging. It is shown that for a Swerling II target, the added loss of CVI is always lower than the added loss of the corresponding binary integrator. CVI is also less susceptible to strong interferences.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":441674,"journal":{"name":"IEEE International Conference on Radar","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Censored video integration in radar detection\",\"authors\":\"N. Levanon\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RADAR.1990.201107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The performances of the classical video integrator and the well-known binary integrator (which can also be called an order statistics integrator) are compared with that of a new integrator, called the censored video integrator (CVI), for a Swerling II target in Gaussian noise. CVI performs sorting, censoring, and nonuniform weighted averaging. It is shown that for a Swerling II target, the added loss of CVI is always lower than the added loss of the corresponding binary integrator. CVI is also less susceptible to strong interferences.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":441674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE International Conference on Radar\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE International Conference on Radar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RADAR.1990.201107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE International Conference on Radar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RADAR.1990.201107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The performances of the classical video integrator and the well-known binary integrator (which can also be called an order statistics integrator) are compared with that of a new integrator, called the censored video integrator (CVI), for a Swerling II target in Gaussian noise. CVI performs sorting, censoring, and nonuniform weighted averaging. It is shown that for a Swerling II target, the added loss of CVI is always lower than the added loss of the corresponding binary integrator. CVI is also less susceptible to strong interferences.<>
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
