{"title":"12至15世纪盎格鲁-诺曼和法国大陆对蒙茅斯的杰弗里文集的接受","authors":"J. Blacker","doi":"10.1163/9789004410398_023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1 Given space restrictions, the lists, notes, and references presented here cannot be exhaustive, but are intended to suggest future paths of research. 2 Henry, archdeacon of Huntingdon, was amazed (stupens) to have discovered it at Le Bec in the company of Robert de Torigni, and treated it with caution in his adapted abbreviation of Geoffrey’s DGB, the Epistola ad Warinum (c.1139); see Henry of Huntingdon, History of the English, ed. and trans. D. Greenway, Henry, Archdeacon of Huntingdon: Historia Anglorum. The History of the English People, Oxford, 1996, pp. 558–83, at p. 558; and N. Wright, “The Place of Henry of Huntingdon’s Epistola ad Warinum in the Text-History of Geoffrey of Monmouth’s Historia regum Britannie: a Preliminary Investigation”, in G. Jondorf and D.N. Dumville (eds.), France and the British Isles in the Middle Ages and Renaissance: Essays by Members of Girton College, Cambridge, in Memory of Ruth Morgan, Woodbridge, 1991, pp. 71–113. Alfred of Beverley repeated much of Geoffrey’s account of the history of the Britons in his Annales (c.1143), but noted that no contemporary Saxon or Roman historians had commented on Arthur’s conquests: Annales v, ed. T. Hearne, Aluredi Beverlacensis Annales, sive historia de gestis regum Britanniae, libris IX E. codice pervetusto ..., Oxford, 1716, p. 76. William of Newburgh’s scathing criticism of what he considered Geoffrey’s mendacious propaganda is the most well-known; on William’s criticism, and that of Gerald of Wales (each of whom were writing in the 1190s, and the latter who evinced some ambivalence toward the Galfridian material), see, for example, K. Robertson, “Geoffrey of Monmouth and the Translation of Insular Historiography”, Arthuriana 8:4 (1998), 42–57. See also S. Meecham-Jones, “Early Reactions to Geoffrey’s Work”, pp. 181–208 in this volume. 3 Most recently edited as the De gestis Britonum, ed. M. Reeve and trans. N. Wright, Geoffrey of Monmouth, The History of the Kings of Britain: An Edition and Translation of De gestis Britonum [Historia Regum Britanniae], Woodbridge, 2007; for dating, see p. vii. See also Bern, ed. Wright; and The First Variant Version, ed. Wright. 4 Crick, SC and Crick, DR; for references to Crick’s updates in the count, as well as Reeve’s own discoveries, see DGB, pp. vii–viii, n. 5. See also J. Tahkokallio, “Update to the List of Manuscripts of Geoffrey of Monmouth’s Historia regum Britanniae”, AL 32 (2015), 187–203; id., “Early Manuscript Dissemination”, in this volume, who counts nearly 80 manuscripts","PeriodicalId":206404,"journal":{"name":"A Companion to Geoffrey of Monmouth","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Anglo-Norman and Continental French Reception of Geoffrey of Monmouth’s Corpus from the 12th to the 15th Centuries\",\"authors\":\"J. Blacker\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789004410398_023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"1 Given space restrictions, the lists, notes, and references presented here cannot be exhaustive, but are intended to suggest future paths of research. 2 Henry, archdeacon of Huntingdon, was amazed (stupens) to have discovered it at Le Bec in the company of Robert de Torigni, and treated it with caution in his adapted abbreviation of Geoffrey’s DGB, the Epistola ad Warinum (c.1139); see Henry of Huntingdon, History of the English, ed. and trans. D. Greenway, Henry, Archdeacon of Huntingdon: Historia Anglorum. The History of the English People, Oxford, 1996, pp. 558–83, at p. 558; and N. Wright, “The Place of Henry of Huntingdon’s Epistola ad Warinum in the Text-History of Geoffrey of Monmouth’s Historia regum Britannie: a Preliminary Investigation”, in G. Jondorf and D.N. Dumville (eds.), France and the British Isles in the Middle Ages and Renaissance: Essays by Members of Girton College, Cambridge, in Memory of Ruth Morgan, Woodbridge, 1991, pp. 71–113. Alfred of Beverley repeated much of Geoffrey’s account of the history of the Britons in his Annales (c.1143), but noted that no contemporary Saxon or Roman historians had commented on Arthur’s conquests: Annales v, ed. T. Hearne, Aluredi Beverlacensis Annales, sive historia de gestis regum Britanniae, libris IX E. codice pervetusto ..., Oxford, 1716, p. 76. William of Newburgh’s scathing criticism of what he considered Geoffrey’s mendacious propaganda is the most well-known; on William’s criticism, and that of Gerald of Wales (each of whom were writing in the 1190s, and the latter who evinced some ambivalence toward the Galfridian material), see, for example, K. Robertson, “Geoffrey of Monmouth and the Translation of Insular Historiography”, Arthuriana 8:4 (1998), 42–57. See also S. Meecham-Jones, “Early Reactions to Geoffrey’s Work”, pp. 181–208 in this volume. 3 Most recently edited as the De gestis Britonum, ed. M. Reeve and trans. N. Wright, Geoffrey of Monmouth, The History of the Kings of Britain: An Edition and Translation of De gestis Britonum [Historia Regum Britanniae], Woodbridge, 2007; for dating, see p. vii. See also Bern, ed. Wright; and The First Variant Version, ed. Wright. 4 Crick, SC and Crick, DR; for references to Crick’s updates in the count, as well as Reeve’s own discoveries, see DGB, pp. vii–viii, n. 5. See also J. Tahkokallio, “Update to the List of Manuscripts of Geoffrey of Monmouth’s Historia regum Britanniae”, AL 32 (2015), 187–203; id., “Early Manuscript Dissemination”, in this volume, who counts nearly 80 manuscripts\",\"PeriodicalId\":206404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"A Companion to Geoffrey of Monmouth\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"A Companion to Geoffrey of Monmouth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004410398_023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"A Companion to Geoffrey of Monmouth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004410398_023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
由于篇幅限制,这里列出的列表、注释和参考文献不能详尽无遗,但旨在建议未来的研究路径。2亨利,亨廷顿的副主教,是惊讶(目瞪口呆),发现了它在勒贝克公司的罗伯特德托里尼,并谨慎对待它在他的杰弗里的DGB,书信和Warinum(约1139)的改编缩写;参见亨廷顿的亨利,《英国史》,编译。亨利·格林威,亨廷顿副主教:《英国历史》。《英国人的历史》,牛津,1996年,第558 - 83页,第558页;和N.赖特,“亨廷顿亨利的书信和Warinum在文本中的地位——蒙茅斯的杰弗里的《不列颠帝国的历史》:初步调查”,载于G. Jondorf和D.N. Dumville(编),《中世纪和文艺复兴时期的法国和不列颠群岛:剑桥格顿学院成员的论文》,纪念露丝·摩根,伍德布里奇,1991年,第71-113页。贝弗利的阿尔弗雷德(Alfred of Beverley)在他的《编年史》(Annales)中重复了杰弗里(Geoffrey)对不列颠人历史的大部分描述(约1143年),但他指出,没有同时代的撒克逊或罗马历史学家评论过亚瑟王的征服:《编年史》v, ed. T. Hearne, Aluredi Beverlacensis Annales, sive historia de gestis regum Britanniae, libris IX E. codice pervetusto……,牛津,1716年,第76页。纽伯格的威廉对他认为是杰弗里虚假宣传的严厉批评是最著名的;关于威廉的批评,以及威尔士的杰拉尔德的批评(他们都是在19世纪90年代写作的,后者对加尔弗里德的材料表现出一些矛盾的态度),例如,见K.罗伯逊,“蒙茅斯的杰弗里和岛屿史学的翻译”,《亚瑟王》8:4(1998),42-57。另见S. Meecham-Jones,“对杰弗里作品的早期反应”,本卷第181-208页。最近编辑为《英国地理学》(De gestis Britonum), mr . Reeve和trans.主编。蒙茅斯的Geoffrey N. Wright,《英国国王的历史:De gestis Britonum的版本与翻译》,伍德布里奇,2007;关于约会,见第七章。参见Bern, ed. Wright;和第一个变体版本,编辑。赖特。4克里克,SC和克里克,博士;关于克里克更新计数的参考资料,以及里夫自己的发现,见DGB,第7 - 8页,第5页。另见J. Tahkokallio,“蒙茅斯的杰弗里的《不列颠帝国史》手稿清单的更新”,AL 32 (2015), 187-203;id。,“早期手稿传播”,在本卷中,他统计了近80份手稿
The Anglo-Norman and Continental French Reception of Geoffrey of Monmouth’s Corpus from the 12th to the 15th Centuries
1 Given space restrictions, the lists, notes, and references presented here cannot be exhaustive, but are intended to suggest future paths of research. 2 Henry, archdeacon of Huntingdon, was amazed (stupens) to have discovered it at Le Bec in the company of Robert de Torigni, and treated it with caution in his adapted abbreviation of Geoffrey’s DGB, the Epistola ad Warinum (c.1139); see Henry of Huntingdon, History of the English, ed. and trans. D. Greenway, Henry, Archdeacon of Huntingdon: Historia Anglorum. The History of the English People, Oxford, 1996, pp. 558–83, at p. 558; and N. Wright, “The Place of Henry of Huntingdon’s Epistola ad Warinum in the Text-History of Geoffrey of Monmouth’s Historia regum Britannie: a Preliminary Investigation”, in G. Jondorf and D.N. Dumville (eds.), France and the British Isles in the Middle Ages and Renaissance: Essays by Members of Girton College, Cambridge, in Memory of Ruth Morgan, Woodbridge, 1991, pp. 71–113. Alfred of Beverley repeated much of Geoffrey’s account of the history of the Britons in his Annales (c.1143), but noted that no contemporary Saxon or Roman historians had commented on Arthur’s conquests: Annales v, ed. T. Hearne, Aluredi Beverlacensis Annales, sive historia de gestis regum Britanniae, libris IX E. codice pervetusto ..., Oxford, 1716, p. 76. William of Newburgh’s scathing criticism of what he considered Geoffrey’s mendacious propaganda is the most well-known; on William’s criticism, and that of Gerald of Wales (each of whom were writing in the 1190s, and the latter who evinced some ambivalence toward the Galfridian material), see, for example, K. Robertson, “Geoffrey of Monmouth and the Translation of Insular Historiography”, Arthuriana 8:4 (1998), 42–57. See also S. Meecham-Jones, “Early Reactions to Geoffrey’s Work”, pp. 181–208 in this volume. 3 Most recently edited as the De gestis Britonum, ed. M. Reeve and trans. N. Wright, Geoffrey of Monmouth, The History of the Kings of Britain: An Edition and Translation of De gestis Britonum [Historia Regum Britanniae], Woodbridge, 2007; for dating, see p. vii. See also Bern, ed. Wright; and The First Variant Version, ed. Wright. 4 Crick, SC and Crick, DR; for references to Crick’s updates in the count, as well as Reeve’s own discoveries, see DGB, pp. vii–viii, n. 5. See also J. Tahkokallio, “Update to the List of Manuscripts of Geoffrey of Monmouth’s Historia regum Britanniae”, AL 32 (2015), 187–203; id., “Early Manuscript Dissemination”, in this volume, who counts nearly 80 manuscripts