急诊病人家属代理决策中护士参与的困难及原因分析

Hiromi Uesawa, Misuzu Nakamura
{"title":"急诊病人家属代理决策中护士参与的困难及原因分析","authors":"Hiromi Uesawa, Misuzu Nakamura","doi":"10.11153/JACCN.9.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to identify difficulties of nurses who are involved in families performing surrogate decision-making for an emergency patient and their reasons. Semi-structured interviews were conducted involving 8 subjects. The obtained data were categorized based on Berelson, B content analysis, and an agreement rate of more than 70%, which was calculated based on the formula of Scott W.A., was used as criteria to ensure the reliability of the categories. As a result, 302 descriptions and expressions were extracted and classified into 13 categories, including [Nurses become suffer, being unable to accept decision-making by family members in a positive manner] and [Nurses become suffer because physicians often make decisions regarding treatment], and 698 were extracted regarding the reasons and grouped into 14 categories, such as [Due to their sense of ethics, views on nursing, and values, some nurses cannot positively accept decisions made by family members] and [Nurses have no means of evaluating their own approaches]. The agreement rate was 82.9% for difficulties and 93.2% for reasons, showing that the reliability was confirmed in both difficulties and reasons. The results suggest the need to conduct regular emergency case conferences among different professions to help nurses to reconfirm their individual responsibility and involvement with families, and provide an environment for nurses to review their practices to reduce their nursing ethical conflict.","PeriodicalId":414997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Japan Academy of Critical Care Nursing","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Difficulties of Nurses who are Involved in Family's Surrogate Decision-Making for an Emergency Patient and Their Reasons\",\"authors\":\"Hiromi Uesawa, Misuzu Nakamura\",\"doi\":\"10.11153/JACCN.9.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to identify difficulties of nurses who are involved in families performing surrogate decision-making for an emergency patient and their reasons. Semi-structured interviews were conducted involving 8 subjects. The obtained data were categorized based on Berelson, B content analysis, and an agreement rate of more than 70%, which was calculated based on the formula of Scott W.A., was used as criteria to ensure the reliability of the categories. As a result, 302 descriptions and expressions were extracted and classified into 13 categories, including [Nurses become suffer, being unable to accept decision-making by family members in a positive manner] and [Nurses become suffer because physicians often make decisions regarding treatment], and 698 were extracted regarding the reasons and grouped into 14 categories, such as [Due to their sense of ethics, views on nursing, and values, some nurses cannot positively accept decisions made by family members] and [Nurses have no means of evaluating their own approaches]. The agreement rate was 82.9% for difficulties and 93.2% for reasons, showing that the reliability was confirmed in both difficulties and reasons. The results suggest the need to conduct regular emergency case conferences among different professions to help nurses to reconfirm their individual responsibility and involvement with families, and provide an environment for nurses to review their practices to reduce their nursing ethical conflict.\",\"PeriodicalId\":414997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Japan Academy of Critical Care Nursing\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Japan Academy of Critical Care Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11153/JACCN.9.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Japan Academy of Critical Care Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11153/JACCN.9.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究的目的是确定护士参与家庭为急诊病人执行代理决策的困难及其原因。对8名被试进行半结构化访谈。根据Berelson, B含量分析对所得数据进行分类,并以Scott W.A公式计算的符合率大于70%作为标准,以保证分类的可靠性。结果提取出302种描述和表达,并将其分为[护士变得痛苦,无法以积极的态度接受家庭成员的决策]和[护士变得痛苦,因为医生经常对治疗做出决定]等13类;提取出698种描述和表达,并将其分为[由于他们的道德感,护理观,价值观]等14类。一些护士不能积极地接受家属的决定]和[护士没有办法评估自己的方法]。困难的一致性为82.9%,原因的一致性为93.2%,说明困难和原因的可靠性都得到了证实。结果表明,需要定期召开不同专业的急诊病例会议,以帮助护士重新确认其个人责任和家庭参与,并为护士提供一个审查其实践的环境,以减少护理伦理冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Difficulties of Nurses who are Involved in Family's Surrogate Decision-Making for an Emergency Patient and Their Reasons
This study aimed to identify difficulties of nurses who are involved in families performing surrogate decision-making for an emergency patient and their reasons. Semi-structured interviews were conducted involving 8 subjects. The obtained data were categorized based on Berelson, B content analysis, and an agreement rate of more than 70%, which was calculated based on the formula of Scott W.A., was used as criteria to ensure the reliability of the categories. As a result, 302 descriptions and expressions were extracted and classified into 13 categories, including [Nurses become suffer, being unable to accept decision-making by family members in a positive manner] and [Nurses become suffer because physicians often make decisions regarding treatment], and 698 were extracted regarding the reasons and grouped into 14 categories, such as [Due to their sense of ethics, views on nursing, and values, some nurses cannot positively accept decisions made by family members] and [Nurses have no means of evaluating their own approaches]. The agreement rate was 82.9% for difficulties and 93.2% for reasons, showing that the reliability was confirmed in both difficulties and reasons. The results suggest the need to conduct regular emergency case conferences among different professions to help nurses to reconfirm their individual responsibility and involvement with families, and provide an environment for nurses to review their practices to reduce their nursing ethical conflict.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信