和相似的学生一起学习,学生能学到更多吗?来自韩国高中的证据

D. Kwak, Jin-Young Lee
{"title":"和相似的学生一起学习,学生能学到更多吗?来自韩国高中的证据","authors":"D. Kwak, Jin-Young Lee","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3415395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the effects of high school de-tracking on Korean SAT scores. After accounting for the sample selection bias using an event study approach with matching, we identify three distinct channels of de-tracking effects: classroom effects from peer quality and teaching effectiveness, campus effects from school facilities and resources, and supplement effects from parental inputs. We find that de-tracking reduces the test scores for each subject by 0.05-0.09 of one standard deviation, and that classroom effects are the most important. The negative classroom effect is primarily driven by teaching effectiveness (i.e., teacher-student match quality), and the effect heterogeneity comes mostly from peer quality changes. We also find that the negative effect of de-tracking is the strongest for students at the top percentiles of the score distribution and the part of classroom effects is mitigated by supplementary effects for the parents of students at the top percentiles of the score distribution.","PeriodicalId":173713,"journal":{"name":"Pedagogy eJournal","volume":"os-24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Students Learn More When Studying with Similar Students? Evidence from Korean High Schools\",\"authors\":\"D. Kwak, Jin-Young Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3415395\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the effects of high school de-tracking on Korean SAT scores. After accounting for the sample selection bias using an event study approach with matching, we identify three distinct channels of de-tracking effects: classroom effects from peer quality and teaching effectiveness, campus effects from school facilities and resources, and supplement effects from parental inputs. We find that de-tracking reduces the test scores for each subject by 0.05-0.09 of one standard deviation, and that classroom effects are the most important. The negative classroom effect is primarily driven by teaching effectiveness (i.e., teacher-student match quality), and the effect heterogeneity comes mostly from peer quality changes. We also find that the negative effect of de-tracking is the strongest for students at the top percentiles of the score distribution and the part of classroom effects is mitigated by supplementary effects for the parents of students at the top percentiles of the score distribution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":173713,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pedagogy eJournal\",\"volume\":\"os-24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pedagogy eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3415395\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedagogy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3415395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇论文探讨了高中脱轨对韩国SAT成绩的影响。在使用匹配的事件研究方法考虑样本选择偏差后,我们确定了三种不同的偏离效应渠道:来自同伴质量和教学有效性的课堂效应,来自学校设施和资源的校园效应,以及来自家长投入的补充效应。我们发现,脱轨使每个科目的考试成绩降低了一个标准差的0.05-0.09,课堂效应是最重要的。课堂负向效应主要由教学有效性(即师生匹配质量)驱动,效应异质性主要由同伴质量变化驱动。我们还发现,在分数分布中处于前百分位的学生中,偏离的负面影响是最强的,而在分数分布中处于前百分位的学生的家长中,课堂效应的部分被补充效应所抵消。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do Students Learn More When Studying with Similar Students? Evidence from Korean High Schools
This paper examines the effects of high school de-tracking on Korean SAT scores. After accounting for the sample selection bias using an event study approach with matching, we identify three distinct channels of de-tracking effects: classroom effects from peer quality and teaching effectiveness, campus effects from school facilities and resources, and supplement effects from parental inputs. We find that de-tracking reduces the test scores for each subject by 0.05-0.09 of one standard deviation, and that classroom effects are the most important. The negative classroom effect is primarily driven by teaching effectiveness (i.e., teacher-student match quality), and the effect heterogeneity comes mostly from peer quality changes. We also find that the negative effect of de-tracking is the strongest for students at the top percentiles of the score distribution and the part of classroom effects is mitigated by supplementary effects for the parents of students at the top percentiles of the score distribution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信