两个渠道的故事:在限价单市场中纳入私人信息

Zhong Zhang
{"title":"两个渠道的故事:在限价单市场中纳入私人信息","authors":"Zhong Zhang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2222671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study empirically investigates informed investors’ choice between demanding and supplying liquidity, and the incorporation of private information through both liquidity demanding and supplying channel of limit order market. By extending the structural model of Easley, et al. (1996) to allow informed traders supplying liquidity through price improving and at-the-quote limit orders, I find that supplying liquidity becomes the dominating choice for informed traders after 2003. As a result, private information incorporated through the liquidity supplying channel increases to near seven times of the amount from the liquidity demanding channel. As supplying channel private information will be revealed in limit order book without initiating transactions, it makes the order book more informative, reduces information asymmetry, and is not priced in asset return.","PeriodicalId":412480,"journal":{"name":"Indiana University Kelley School of Business Research Paper Series","volume":"490-495 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Tale of Two Channels: Incorporating Private Information in Limit Order Market\",\"authors\":\"Zhong Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2222671\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study empirically investigates informed investors’ choice between demanding and supplying liquidity, and the incorporation of private information through both liquidity demanding and supplying channel of limit order market. By extending the structural model of Easley, et al. (1996) to allow informed traders supplying liquidity through price improving and at-the-quote limit orders, I find that supplying liquidity becomes the dominating choice for informed traders after 2003. As a result, private information incorporated through the liquidity supplying channel increases to near seven times of the amount from the liquidity demanding channel. As supplying channel private information will be revealed in limit order book without initiating transactions, it makes the order book more informative, reduces information asymmetry, and is not priced in asset return.\",\"PeriodicalId\":412480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indiana University Kelley School of Business Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"490-495 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indiana University Kelley School of Business Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2222671\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indiana University Kelley School of Business Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2222671","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究实证考察了在限价单市场流动性需求和供给渠道中,知情投资者对流动性需求和供给的选择,以及私人信息的引入。通过扩展Easley等人(1996)的结构模型,允许知情交易者通过提价和限价指令提供流动性,我发现在2003年之后,提供流动性成为知情交易者的主要选择。因此,通过流动性供给渠道吸收的私人信息增加到流动性需求渠道的近7倍。由于供应渠道的私有信息在不启动交易的情况下会在限价单中披露,使得限价单更具信息性,减少了信息不对称,并且不计入资产收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Tale of Two Channels: Incorporating Private Information in Limit Order Market
This study empirically investigates informed investors’ choice between demanding and supplying liquidity, and the incorporation of private information through both liquidity demanding and supplying channel of limit order market. By extending the structural model of Easley, et al. (1996) to allow informed traders supplying liquidity through price improving and at-the-quote limit orders, I find that supplying liquidity becomes the dominating choice for informed traders after 2003. As a result, private information incorporated through the liquidity supplying channel increases to near seven times of the amount from the liquidity demanding channel. As supplying channel private information will be revealed in limit order book without initiating transactions, it makes the order book more informative, reduces information asymmetry, and is not priced in asset return.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信