伊斯兰运动的另类史学:一个分期的建议

S. Özdemir
{"title":"伊斯兰运动的另类史学:一个分期的建议","authors":"S. Özdemir","doi":"10.55709/tsbsbildirilerdergisi.470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The modernity movement, which emerged as a manifestation of the political, economic, and religious transformation of the West, claimed that religions would become obsolete in the process. The systems and understandings institutionalized on this claim and belief have applied this situation to non-Western religions and defined the religious movement and discourse as “reactionary”. When viewed from a different perspective, it is understood that Islamic movements, which are handled with a Western-centered historiography, emerged with Islamic methods. As a matter of fact, when the experiences of transforming the concepts and institutions (Persian bureaucracy, Greek Philosophy, Mongolian Customs...) encountered by Muslims in the history of Islam and the methods they use are taken into account, It is seen that this situation shows itself again against the Orientalist Western states. First of all, Muslims, who acted with methods coming from the Muslim self-perception to resist the invasion attempts of Western states, derived the concept of \"Islamic Civilization\" from the history and roots of Islam, despite the \"civilization\" policy of the Orientalist West. These movements, which took place between 1865 and 1920, showed themselves as \"Islamization of Civilization\". In the renewal process that started after the First World War, Muslims encountered the concept of the modern state and aimed to Islamize this concept or to oppose it. Concepts such as \"nation, citizen, monopoly of violence, and constitution\", which are the elements of the modern state, have become new issues that Islamists deal with. In this context, between the years of 1923-1979, Islamists, reacting to the understanding of the modern state (Kemalism, Nasserism, Pahlavi Dynasty), engaged in the conceptualization of the Islamic state, and in this process, efforts to \"Islamize the Modern State\" occurred. The modern state system was hit hard by the Iranian Islamic Revolution in 1979; A new process has begun for Islamic movements. After the understanding based on Arab nationalism lost its influence with the Camp David Agreement and the Afghan Jihad, Islam was reinterpreted as a new element. In this process, Islamic movements, which were reorganized as an alternative to the regimes that were institutionalized in isolation from the people, aimed to have a say in power through democracy. In this context, the prominent concept of this process has been democracy, and Islamists have developed new understandings by \"Islamizing democracy\". The process that started in 1979 continued with the ten-year cycle (end of the cold war, September 11 attacks). In this process, Islamic movements, with regimes representing the established order, at the local level; They have redefined themselves and their roadmaps at the global level to oppose the policy developed by the USA against the Islamic world. When it came to 2011, Islamism found itself at the center of change against the regimes that entered into a systemic and mental crisis as a result of the popular uprising. Confronting the concepts of power, such as democracy, pluralism, human rights and equality in this process, Islamic movements have embarked on the path of \"Islamization of power\". The Islamist movement, which is discussed in the literature through anti-Westernism and allegedly \"failure\", has redefined itself by reinterpreting concepts such as democracy and human rights (the Ennahda Party in Tunisia). In this process, where the western-centred system and understanding changed, the Islamism movement, which was synthesized with local interpretations, aimed to build a new understanding around the concepts of moderation and reconciliation in the new process. This study, which tries to produce counter-arguments that the Islamist movement can only exist with Western values, has tried to bring a new perspective to the literature by periodizing political history. As a result of the study, it has been claimed that this trend, which developed reactively, occurred in order to resist the dominant current of the period with its own methods, and that Islamists tried to make these concepts suitable for the Muslim mind world. This study, which deals with the alleged periodizations with individuals and institutions, aims to bring different perspectives to the politics of Islamism, which is a controversial issue today.","PeriodicalId":286866,"journal":{"name":"TSBS Bildiriler Dergisi","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alternative Historiography of the Islamist Movement: A Periodization Proposal\",\"authors\":\"S. Özdemir\",\"doi\":\"10.55709/tsbsbildirilerdergisi.470\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The modernity movement, which emerged as a manifestation of the political, economic, and religious transformation of the West, claimed that religions would become obsolete in the process. The systems and understandings institutionalized on this claim and belief have applied this situation to non-Western religions and defined the religious movement and discourse as “reactionary”. When viewed from a different perspective, it is understood that Islamic movements, which are handled with a Western-centered historiography, emerged with Islamic methods. As a matter of fact, when the experiences of transforming the concepts and institutions (Persian bureaucracy, Greek Philosophy, Mongolian Customs...) encountered by Muslims in the history of Islam and the methods they use are taken into account, It is seen that this situation shows itself again against the Orientalist Western states. First of all, Muslims, who acted with methods coming from the Muslim self-perception to resist the invasion attempts of Western states, derived the concept of \\\"Islamic Civilization\\\" from the history and roots of Islam, despite the \\\"civilization\\\" policy of the Orientalist West. These movements, which took place between 1865 and 1920, showed themselves as \\\"Islamization of Civilization\\\". In the renewal process that started after the First World War, Muslims encountered the concept of the modern state and aimed to Islamize this concept or to oppose it. Concepts such as \\\"nation, citizen, monopoly of violence, and constitution\\\", which are the elements of the modern state, have become new issues that Islamists deal with. In this context, between the years of 1923-1979, Islamists, reacting to the understanding of the modern state (Kemalism, Nasserism, Pahlavi Dynasty), engaged in the conceptualization of the Islamic state, and in this process, efforts to \\\"Islamize the Modern State\\\" occurred. The modern state system was hit hard by the Iranian Islamic Revolution in 1979; A new process has begun for Islamic movements. After the understanding based on Arab nationalism lost its influence with the Camp David Agreement and the Afghan Jihad, Islam was reinterpreted as a new element. In this process, Islamic movements, which were reorganized as an alternative to the regimes that were institutionalized in isolation from the people, aimed to have a say in power through democracy. In this context, the prominent concept of this process has been democracy, and Islamists have developed new understandings by \\\"Islamizing democracy\\\". The process that started in 1979 continued with the ten-year cycle (end of the cold war, September 11 attacks). In this process, Islamic movements, with regimes representing the established order, at the local level; They have redefined themselves and their roadmaps at the global level to oppose the policy developed by the USA against the Islamic world. When it came to 2011, Islamism found itself at the center of change against the regimes that entered into a systemic and mental crisis as a result of the popular uprising. Confronting the concepts of power, such as democracy, pluralism, human rights and equality in this process, Islamic movements have embarked on the path of \\\"Islamization of power\\\". The Islamist movement, which is discussed in the literature through anti-Westernism and allegedly \\\"failure\\\", has redefined itself by reinterpreting concepts such as democracy and human rights (the Ennahda Party in Tunisia). In this process, where the western-centred system and understanding changed, the Islamism movement, which was synthesized with local interpretations, aimed to build a new understanding around the concepts of moderation and reconciliation in the new process. This study, which tries to produce counter-arguments that the Islamist movement can only exist with Western values, has tried to bring a new perspective to the literature by periodizing political history. As a result of the study, it has been claimed that this trend, which developed reactively, occurred in order to resist the dominant current of the period with its own methods, and that Islamists tried to make these concepts suitable for the Muslim mind world. This study, which deals with the alleged periodizations with individuals and institutions, aims to bring different perspectives to the politics of Islamism, which is a controversial issue today.\",\"PeriodicalId\":286866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TSBS Bildiriler Dergisi\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TSBS Bildiriler Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55709/tsbsbildirilerdergisi.470\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TSBS Bildiriler Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55709/tsbsbildirilerdergisi.470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为西方政治、经济和宗教转型的表现而出现的现代性运动声称,宗教将在这一过程中变得过时。基于这种主张和信仰而制度化的体系和理解,将这种情况应用于非西方宗教,并将宗教运动和话语定义为“反动的”。从另一个角度来看,可以理解为,以西方为中心的史学处理的伊斯兰运动是以伊斯兰的方法出现的。事实上,当考虑到穆斯林在伊斯兰历史上所遇到的观念和制度(波斯的官僚主义、希腊的哲学、蒙古的风俗习惯……)的改造经验及其使用的方法时,这种情况就会在东方主义的西方国家身上再次显现出来。首先,穆斯林用来自穆斯林自我认知的方法抵制西方国家的入侵企图,他们从伊斯兰教的历史和根源中衍生出“伊斯兰文明”的概念,而不顾东方主义西方的“文明”政策。这些运动发生在1865年至1920年之间,表现为“文明的伊斯兰化”。在第一次世界大战后开始的更新过程中,穆斯林遇到了现代国家的概念,并试图将这一概念伊斯兰化或反对它。作为现代国家要素的“民族、公民、暴力垄断、宪法”等概念,成为伊斯兰主义者应对的新问题。在此背景下,1923-1979年间,伊斯兰主义者对现代国家的理解(凯末尔主义、纳赛尔主义、巴列维王朝)做出了反应,参与了伊斯兰国家的概念化,并在此过程中出现了“伊斯兰化现代国家”的努力。现代国家制度在1979年的伊朗伊斯兰革命中受到重创;伊斯兰运动的新进程已经开始。以阿拉伯民族主义为基础的理解随着《戴维营协定》和阿富汗圣战失去影响力后,伊斯兰教被重新诠释为新的元素。在这一过程中,作为与人民隔绝的制度化政权的替代品而重新组织起来的伊斯兰运动旨在通过民主在权力中拥有发言权。在这种背景下,这一进程的突出概念是民主,伊斯兰主义者通过“伊斯兰化民主”发展了新的理解。1979年开始的这一进程以十年为周期(冷战结束,9·11袭击)继续进行。在这个过程中,伊斯兰运动,其政权代表了地方一级的既定秩序;他们重新定义了自己和他们在全球层面的路线图,以反对美国制定的针对伊斯兰世界的政策。到了2011年,伊斯兰主义发现自己处于变革的中心,反对那些因民众起义而陷入系统性和精神危机的政权。在这一过程中,伊斯兰运动面对民主、多元、人权和平等等权力概念,走上了“权力伊斯兰化”的道路。在文学作品中,伊斯兰运动被认为是反西方主义和所谓的“失败”,它通过重新解释民主和人权等概念(突尼斯的复兴运动党)来重新定义自己。在这一过程中,以西方为中心的制度和理解发生了变化,伊斯兰主义运动与地方解释相结合,旨在围绕新进程中的温和与和解概念建立新的理解。这项研究试图提出相反的观点,即伊斯兰运动只能与西方价值观共存,并试图通过对政治史进行分期分析,为文学带来新的视角。这项研究的结果是,有人声称,这种反动发展的趋势是为了用自己的方法抵制当时的主流,伊斯兰主义者试图使这些概念适用于穆斯林的思想世界。这项研究涉及所谓的个人和机构的分期,旨在为伊斯兰主义的政治带来不同的视角,这是当今一个有争议的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Alternative Historiography of the Islamist Movement: A Periodization Proposal
The modernity movement, which emerged as a manifestation of the political, economic, and religious transformation of the West, claimed that religions would become obsolete in the process. The systems and understandings institutionalized on this claim and belief have applied this situation to non-Western religions and defined the religious movement and discourse as “reactionary”. When viewed from a different perspective, it is understood that Islamic movements, which are handled with a Western-centered historiography, emerged with Islamic methods. As a matter of fact, when the experiences of transforming the concepts and institutions (Persian bureaucracy, Greek Philosophy, Mongolian Customs...) encountered by Muslims in the history of Islam and the methods they use are taken into account, It is seen that this situation shows itself again against the Orientalist Western states. First of all, Muslims, who acted with methods coming from the Muslim self-perception to resist the invasion attempts of Western states, derived the concept of "Islamic Civilization" from the history and roots of Islam, despite the "civilization" policy of the Orientalist West. These movements, which took place between 1865 and 1920, showed themselves as "Islamization of Civilization". In the renewal process that started after the First World War, Muslims encountered the concept of the modern state and aimed to Islamize this concept or to oppose it. Concepts such as "nation, citizen, monopoly of violence, and constitution", which are the elements of the modern state, have become new issues that Islamists deal with. In this context, between the years of 1923-1979, Islamists, reacting to the understanding of the modern state (Kemalism, Nasserism, Pahlavi Dynasty), engaged in the conceptualization of the Islamic state, and in this process, efforts to "Islamize the Modern State" occurred. The modern state system was hit hard by the Iranian Islamic Revolution in 1979; A new process has begun for Islamic movements. After the understanding based on Arab nationalism lost its influence with the Camp David Agreement and the Afghan Jihad, Islam was reinterpreted as a new element. In this process, Islamic movements, which were reorganized as an alternative to the regimes that were institutionalized in isolation from the people, aimed to have a say in power through democracy. In this context, the prominent concept of this process has been democracy, and Islamists have developed new understandings by "Islamizing democracy". The process that started in 1979 continued with the ten-year cycle (end of the cold war, September 11 attacks). In this process, Islamic movements, with regimes representing the established order, at the local level; They have redefined themselves and their roadmaps at the global level to oppose the policy developed by the USA against the Islamic world. When it came to 2011, Islamism found itself at the center of change against the regimes that entered into a systemic and mental crisis as a result of the popular uprising. Confronting the concepts of power, such as democracy, pluralism, human rights and equality in this process, Islamic movements have embarked on the path of "Islamization of power". The Islamist movement, which is discussed in the literature through anti-Westernism and allegedly "failure", has redefined itself by reinterpreting concepts such as democracy and human rights (the Ennahda Party in Tunisia). In this process, where the western-centred system and understanding changed, the Islamism movement, which was synthesized with local interpretations, aimed to build a new understanding around the concepts of moderation and reconciliation in the new process. This study, which tries to produce counter-arguments that the Islamist movement can only exist with Western values, has tried to bring a new perspective to the literature by periodizing political history. As a result of the study, it has been claimed that this trend, which developed reactively, occurred in order to resist the dominant current of the period with its own methods, and that Islamists tried to make these concepts suitable for the Muslim mind world. This study, which deals with the alleged periodizations with individuals and institutions, aims to bring different perspectives to the politics of Islamism, which is a controversial issue today.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信