埃塞俄比亚阿姆哈拉地区Angolelanatera地区生牛奶的理化分析和微生物质量及其生产系统

G. Kassa, Tewodros Eshete, L. Gazu
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚阿姆哈拉地区Angolelanatera地区生牛奶的理化分析和微生物质量及其生产系统","authors":"G. Kassa, Tewodros Eshete, L. Gazu","doi":"10.14196/sjas.v5i10.2319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted to determine physicochemical analysis and microbial quality of raw cow’s milk along with the production system in the study area. Data was collected by conducting experimental activities and survey. Statistical package for social science (SPSS) were used to analyze data. The main income sources of the respondents were mixed agriculture (92.5%) and 44.5% respondents had basic education. 78.3%  respondents believed the milk quality of local cows were better than cross cows. Natural grazing, crop residues and conserved hay (54.6, 41.8 and 3.6) % were the main feed resources in the study area respectively. The only improved forage species were oat and vetch but most respondents feed these forage species after the seed was collected. The maximum mean of fat and protein content of cow’s raw milk in the study areas were 5.30±0.28 and 3.29±0.05 in Chekiy local cows and Chefanen cross cows respectively. The highest total bacterial and coli form count was recorded in Tsigereeda and Chacha kebeles (3.75x10 8 and 2.16x 10 5 ) respectively. The average number of yeast and mold was 1.56x10 5 , 1.97x10 5 , 2.14x10 5 and 1.73x10 5 in Tsigereda, Chekiey, Chefanen and Chacha respectively. The highest bacterial and coli form count was recorded due to poor hygienic practice. Interventions about hygienic practice will solve the listed problems.","PeriodicalId":210831,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Journal of Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physicochemical analysis and microbial quality of raw cow's milk along with production system in Angolelanatera district, Amhara region, Ethiopia\",\"authors\":\"G. Kassa, Tewodros Eshete, L. Gazu\",\"doi\":\"10.14196/sjas.v5i10.2319\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study was conducted to determine physicochemical analysis and microbial quality of raw cow’s milk along with the production system in the study area. Data was collected by conducting experimental activities and survey. Statistical package for social science (SPSS) were used to analyze data. The main income sources of the respondents were mixed agriculture (92.5%) and 44.5% respondents had basic education. 78.3%  respondents believed the milk quality of local cows were better than cross cows. Natural grazing, crop residues and conserved hay (54.6, 41.8 and 3.6) % were the main feed resources in the study area respectively. The only improved forage species were oat and vetch but most respondents feed these forage species after the seed was collected. The maximum mean of fat and protein content of cow’s raw milk in the study areas were 5.30±0.28 and 3.29±0.05 in Chekiy local cows and Chefanen cross cows respectively. The highest total bacterial and coli form count was recorded in Tsigereeda and Chacha kebeles (3.75x10 8 and 2.16x 10 5 ) respectively. The average number of yeast and mold was 1.56x10 5 , 1.97x10 5 , 2.14x10 5 and 1.73x10 5 in Tsigereda, Chekiey, Chefanen and Chacha respectively. The highest bacterial and coli form count was recorded due to poor hygienic practice. Interventions about hygienic practice will solve the listed problems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":210831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Journal of Animal Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Journal of Animal Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14196/sjas.v5i10.2319\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Journal of Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14196/sjas.v5i10.2319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究对研究地区生牛奶的理化分析和微生物质量进行了测定,并对生产系统进行了分析。通过实验活动和调查收集数据。采用SPSS软件对数据进行分析。受访者的主要收入来源为混合农业(92.5%),44.5%的受访者受过基础教育。78.3%的受访者认为本地奶牛的牛奶质量好于杂交奶牛。自然放牧、作物残茬和保存干草是研究区主要的饲料资源(分别占54.6%、41.8%和3.6%)。改良的饲料品种只有燕麦和野豌豆,但大多数回答者在采集种子后再饲喂这些饲料。研究区契诃夫本地奶牛和契诃夫杂交奶牛原料奶脂肪和蛋白质含量的最高平均值分别为5.30±0.28和3.29±0.05。细菌总数和大肠杆菌总数最高的分别是齐格氏菌(3.75 × 10 8)和恰氏菌(2.16 × 10 5)。Tsigereda、Chekiey、Chefanen和Chacha的酵母和霉菌平均数量分别为1.56 × 10 5、1.97 × 10 5、2.14 × 10 5和1.73 × 10 5。由于卫生习惯不佳,细菌和大肠杆菌数量最高。卫生行为干预将解决上述问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Physicochemical analysis and microbial quality of raw cow's milk along with production system in Angolelanatera district, Amhara region, Ethiopia
This study was conducted to determine physicochemical analysis and microbial quality of raw cow’s milk along with the production system in the study area. Data was collected by conducting experimental activities and survey. Statistical package for social science (SPSS) were used to analyze data. The main income sources of the respondents were mixed agriculture (92.5%) and 44.5% respondents had basic education. 78.3%  respondents believed the milk quality of local cows were better than cross cows. Natural grazing, crop residues and conserved hay (54.6, 41.8 and 3.6) % were the main feed resources in the study area respectively. The only improved forage species were oat and vetch but most respondents feed these forage species after the seed was collected. The maximum mean of fat and protein content of cow’s raw milk in the study areas were 5.30±0.28 and 3.29±0.05 in Chekiy local cows and Chefanen cross cows respectively. The highest total bacterial and coli form count was recorded in Tsigereeda and Chacha kebeles (3.75x10 8 and 2.16x 10 5 ) respectively. The average number of yeast and mold was 1.56x10 5 , 1.97x10 5 , 2.14x10 5 and 1.73x10 5 in Tsigereda, Chekiey, Chefanen and Chacha respectively. The highest bacterial and coli form count was recorded due to poor hygienic practice. Interventions about hygienic practice will solve the listed problems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信