反律法

Respublica literaria Pub Date : 2020-12-25 DOI:10.47850/S.2020.1.35

Eugene Afonasin

{"title":"反律法","authors":"Eugene Afonasin","doi":"10.47850/S.2020.1.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the paper I deal with the concept of legal responsibility in Antiphon viewed against the background of popular Greek distinction between natural and positive law. Ta eikota (probable inferences), as we will see, are opposed in Antiphon to ergon or ta pragmata (the facts), but this does not solve and even worsen all the interpretative difficulties.","PeriodicalId":370810,"journal":{"name":"Respublica literaria","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANTIPHON ON LAW\",\"authors\":\"Eugene Afonasin\",\"doi\":\"10.47850/S.2020.1.35\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the paper I deal with the concept of legal responsibility in Antiphon viewed against the background of popular Greek distinction between natural and positive law. Ta eikota (probable inferences), as we will see, are opposed in Antiphon to ergon or ta pragmata (the facts), but this does not solve and even worsen all the interpretative difficulties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":370810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respublica literaria\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respublica literaria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47850/S.2020.1.35\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respublica literaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47850/S.2020.1.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从希腊通俗的自然法与成文法的区分出发，探讨《安提phon》中的法律责任概念。我们将会看到，在《Antiphon》中，“Ta eikota”(可能的推论)与“ergon”或“Ta pragmata”(事实)是对立的，但这并不能解决所有解释上的困难，甚至使之恶化。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

ANTIPHON ON LAW

In the paper I deal with the concept of legal responsibility in Antiphon viewed against the background of popular Greek distinction between natural and positive law. Ta eikota (probable inferences), as we will see, are opposed in Antiphon to ergon or ta pragmata (the facts), but this does not solve and even worsen all the interpretative difficulties.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Respublica literaria

自引率

0.00%

发文量