利用文献计量网络分析和主题建模揭示隐私研究的结构

Friso van Dijk, Joost Gadellaa, Chaïm van Toledo, Marco Spruit, S. Brinkkemper, Matthieu J. S. Brinkhuis
{"title":"利用文献计量网络分析和主题建模揭示隐私研究的结构","authors":"Friso van Dijk, Joost Gadellaa, Chaïm van Toledo, Marco Spruit, S. Brinkkemper, Matthieu J. S. Brinkhuis","doi":"10.1108/ocj-11-2021-0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper aims that privacy research is divided in distinct communities and rarely considered as a singular field, harming its disciplinary identity. The authors collected 119.810 publications and over 3 million references to perform a bibliometric domain analysis as a quantitative approach to uncover the structures within the privacy research field.Design/methodology/approachThe bibliometric domain analysis consists of a combined directed network and topic model of published privacy research. The network contains 83,159 publications and 462,633 internal references. A Latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) topic model from the same dataset offers an additional lens on structure by classifying each publication on 36 topics with the network data. The combined outcomes of these methods are used to investigate the structural position and topical make-up of the privacy research communities.FindingsThe authors identified the research communities as well as categorised their structural positioning. Four communities form the core of privacy research: individual privacy and law, cloud computing, location data and privacy-preserving data publishing. The latter is a macro-community of data mining, anonymity metrics and differential privacy. Surrounding the core are applied communities. Further removed are communities with little influence, most notably the medical communities that make up 14.4% of the network. The topic model shows system design as a potentially latent community. Noteworthy is the absence of a centralised body of knowledge on organisational privacy management.Originality/valueThis is the first in-depth, quantitative mapping study of all privacy research.","PeriodicalId":107089,"journal":{"name":"Organizational Cybersecurity Journal: Practice, Process and People","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uncovering the structures of privacy research using bibliometric network analysis and topic modelling\",\"authors\":\"Friso van Dijk, Joost Gadellaa, Chaïm van Toledo, Marco Spruit, S. Brinkkemper, Matthieu J. S. Brinkhuis\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ocj-11-2021-0034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThis paper aims that privacy research is divided in distinct communities and rarely considered as a singular field, harming its disciplinary identity. The authors collected 119.810 publications and over 3 million references to perform a bibliometric domain analysis as a quantitative approach to uncover the structures within the privacy research field.Design/methodology/approachThe bibliometric domain analysis consists of a combined directed network and topic model of published privacy research. The network contains 83,159 publications and 462,633 internal references. A Latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) topic model from the same dataset offers an additional lens on structure by classifying each publication on 36 topics with the network data. The combined outcomes of these methods are used to investigate the structural position and topical make-up of the privacy research communities.FindingsThe authors identified the research communities as well as categorised their structural positioning. Four communities form the core of privacy research: individual privacy and law, cloud computing, location data and privacy-preserving data publishing. The latter is a macro-community of data mining, anonymity metrics and differential privacy. Surrounding the core are applied communities. Further removed are communities with little influence, most notably the medical communities that make up 14.4% of the network. The topic model shows system design as a potentially latent community. Noteworthy is the absence of a centralised body of knowledge on organisational privacy management.Originality/valueThis is the first in-depth, quantitative mapping study of all privacy research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":107089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Organizational Cybersecurity Journal: Practice, Process and People\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Organizational Cybersecurity Journal: Practice, Process and People\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ocj-11-2021-0034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organizational Cybersecurity Journal: Practice, Process and People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ocj-11-2021-0034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

隐私研究被划分为不同的社区,很少被视为一个单一的领域,损害了它的学科身份。作者收集了119.810份出版物和300多万篇参考文献,进行了文献计量领域分析,作为一种定量方法来揭示隐私研究领域的结构。设计/方法/方法文献计量学领域分析由有向网络和出版隐私研究的主题模型相结合组成。该网络包含83,159份出版物和462,633份内部参考资料。来自同一数据集的潜在狄利克雷分配(LDA)主题模型通过使用网络数据对36个主题的每个出版物进行分类,为结构提供了额外的视角。这些方法的综合结果用于调查隐私研究社区的结构位置和专题组成。研究结果作者确定了研究群体,并对其结构定位进行了分类。四个社区构成了隐私研究的核心:个人隐私和法律、云计算、位置数据和隐私保护数据发布。后者是一个数据挖掘、匿名度量和差分隐私的宏观社区。核心周围是应用社区。进一步排除的是影响力不大的社区,最明显的是占网络14.4%的医疗社区。主题模型将系统设计显示为一个潜在的潜在社区。值得注意的是,在组织隐私管理方面缺乏一个集中的知识体系。原创性/价值这是所有隐私研究中第一次深入的定量映射研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Uncovering the structures of privacy research using bibliometric network analysis and topic modelling
PurposeThis paper aims that privacy research is divided in distinct communities and rarely considered as a singular field, harming its disciplinary identity. The authors collected 119.810 publications and over 3 million references to perform a bibliometric domain analysis as a quantitative approach to uncover the structures within the privacy research field.Design/methodology/approachThe bibliometric domain analysis consists of a combined directed network and topic model of published privacy research. The network contains 83,159 publications and 462,633 internal references. A Latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) topic model from the same dataset offers an additional lens on structure by classifying each publication on 36 topics with the network data. The combined outcomes of these methods are used to investigate the structural position and topical make-up of the privacy research communities.FindingsThe authors identified the research communities as well as categorised their structural positioning. Four communities form the core of privacy research: individual privacy and law, cloud computing, location data and privacy-preserving data publishing. The latter is a macro-community of data mining, anonymity metrics and differential privacy. Surrounding the core are applied communities. Further removed are communities with little influence, most notably the medical communities that make up 14.4% of the network. The topic model shows system design as a potentially latent community. Noteworthy is the absence of a centralised body of knowledge on organisational privacy management.Originality/valueThis is the first in-depth, quantitative mapping study of all privacy research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信