Xavier Nugraha, Peter Jeremiah Setiawan, Citi Rahmati Serfiyani
{"title":"Legal Protection Against Status Determination of Suspects for Unpleasant Crimes After the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 1/PUU-XI/2013","authors":"Xavier Nugraha, Peter Jeremiah Setiawan, Citi Rahmati Serfiyani","doi":"10.25217/jm.v6i2.1111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Article 335 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code and Article 21 paragraph (4) of the Criminal Procedure Code are deemed to be contradicting Article 28D of the 1945 Constitution. Through the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 1 / PUU-XI / 2013 excluding the phrase \"unpleasant actions\" because they are considered to cause multiple interpretations and put forward subjectivity. This article is exposed to arbitrary actions by the authorities to criminalize someone. In fact, after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 1 / PUU-XI / 2013, there are still pre-trial cases of determining suspects based on unpleasant acts. The formulation of Article 335 Paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, which is used after the decision, requires the fulfillment of 2 (two) elements, namely \"using violence\" or \"threat of violence.\" Thus, in every indictment that wrote the phrase \"unpleasant act\" was considered a legal reason. Determination of a suspect because this is considered a formal defect","PeriodicalId":252786,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Mahkamah : Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Hukum Islam","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Mahkamah : Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Hukum Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25217/jm.v6i2.1111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《刑法》第335条第(1)款和《刑事诉讼法》第21条第(4)款被认为与1945年《宪法》第28D条相抵触。这篇文章可能会受到当局武断行动的影响,将某人定为犯罪。在判决之后使用的《刑法》第335条第(1)款的措词要求满足2(2)个要件,即“使用暴力”或“以暴力相威胁”。因此,在每一份起诉书中,“令人不快的行为”一词都被认为是一个法律理由。确定一个可疑的,因为这被认为是一个正式的缺陷
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Legal Protection Against Status Determination of Suspects for Unpleasant Crimes After the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 1/PUU-XI/2013
Article 335 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code and Article 21 paragraph (4) of the Criminal Procedure Code are deemed to be contradicting Article 28D of the 1945 Constitution. Through the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 1 / PUU-XI / 2013 excluding the phrase "unpleasant actions" because they are considered to cause multiple interpretations and put forward subjectivity. This article is exposed to arbitrary actions by the authorities to criminalize someone. In fact, after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 1 / PUU-XI / 2013, there are still pre-trial cases of determining suspects based on unpleasant acts. The formulation of Article 335 Paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, which is used after the decision, requires the fulfillment of 2 (two) elements, namely "using violence" or "threat of violence." Thus, in every indictment that wrote the phrase "unpleasant act" was considered a legal reason. Determination of a suspect because this is considered a formal defect
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信