为投机性利用中期融资打开大门。对欧盟预防性结构调整框架指令草案的关键评估

Roelf Jakob de Weijs, M.E. Baltjes
{"title":"为投机性利用中期融资打开大门。对欧盟预防性结构调整框架指令草案的关键评估","authors":"Roelf Jakob de Weijs, M.E. Baltjes","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3087961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The draft of the EU Directive on Preventive Restructuring Frameworks and Second Chance (the \"Directive\") provides rules for adopting reorganisation plans in order to avoid insolvency. The draft Directive also provides rules on the related problem of interim financing. According to the draft Directive, interim financing should be encouraged and not be made subject to clawback unless parties have committed fraud or acted in bad faith. The Directive thereby fails to recognise that finance transactions are too diverse in nature to provide the company and its financial creditors with a transaction avoidance free period. If the Directive is adopted in its current form, it will open the door for opportunistic use of interim financing by both debtors and professional lenders. It will allow debtors to make final bets with other people's money and will also allow for conduit pipe financing which will reduce the exposure of existing shareholders. Lenders will also be able to make opportunistic use of the rules, most notably in the form of cross-collateralisation and aggressive loan-to-own strategies under the guise of interim financing. There are several possible solutions to the potential for opportunistic use. The courts could be involved ex ante. This would, however, turn the Directive into a fully-fledged court supervised procedure instead of the currently intended preventive restructuring procedure which avoids such court procedures. An alternative would be to simply take out the provisions on interim financing. Another possibility would be to limit the protection offered in the Directive to cases of new security against new money necessary and used for the continuation of the business.","PeriodicalId":122974,"journal":{"name":"Amsterdam Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Opening the Door for Opportunistic Use of Interim Financing. Critical Assessment of the EU Draft Directive on Preventive Restructuring Frameworks\",\"authors\":\"Roelf Jakob de Weijs, M.E. Baltjes\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3087961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The draft of the EU Directive on Preventive Restructuring Frameworks and Second Chance (the \\\"Directive\\\") provides rules for adopting reorganisation plans in order to avoid insolvency. The draft Directive also provides rules on the related problem of interim financing. According to the draft Directive, interim financing should be encouraged and not be made subject to clawback unless parties have committed fraud or acted in bad faith. The Directive thereby fails to recognise that finance transactions are too diverse in nature to provide the company and its financial creditors with a transaction avoidance free period. If the Directive is adopted in its current form, it will open the door for opportunistic use of interim financing by both debtors and professional lenders. It will allow debtors to make final bets with other people's money and will also allow for conduit pipe financing which will reduce the exposure of existing shareholders. Lenders will also be able to make opportunistic use of the rules, most notably in the form of cross-collateralisation and aggressive loan-to-own strategies under the guise of interim financing. There are several possible solutions to the potential for opportunistic use. The courts could be involved ex ante. This would, however, turn the Directive into a fully-fledged court supervised procedure instead of the currently intended preventive restructuring procedure which avoids such court procedures. An alternative would be to simply take out the provisions on interim financing. Another possibility would be to limit the protection offered in the Directive to cases of new security against new money necessary and used for the continuation of the business.\",\"PeriodicalId\":122974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Amsterdam Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Amsterdam Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3087961\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Amsterdam Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3087961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

欧盟关于预防性重组框架和第二次机会的指令草案(“指令”)规定了采用重组计划以避免破产的规则。指令草案还规定了有关临时筹资问题的规则。根据该指令草案,应鼓励提供临时融资,除非各方犯有欺诈或恶意行为,否则不应收回融资。因此,该指令未能认识到,金融交易在性质上过于多样化,无法为公司及其金融债权人提供交易避免自由期。如果该指令以目前的形式获得通过,它将为债务人和专业贷方投机地利用临时融资打开大门。它将允许债务人用其他人的钱进行最后的赌注,还将允许管道融资,这将减少现有股东的风险敞口。贷款机构还将能够投机取巧地利用这些规则,最明显的形式是交叉抵押和打着临时融资幌子的激进的“贷款到拥有”策略。有几种可能的解决方案来解决机会使用的可能性。法院可以事先介入。然而,这将使《指令》变成一个全面的法院监督程序,而不是目前打算采用的避免这种法院程序的预防性重组程序。另一种办法是干脆取消有关临时融资的规定。另一种可能性是将指令提供的保护限制在为继续经营所必需的新资金提供新担保的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Opening the Door for Opportunistic Use of Interim Financing. Critical Assessment of the EU Draft Directive on Preventive Restructuring Frameworks
The draft of the EU Directive on Preventive Restructuring Frameworks and Second Chance (the "Directive") provides rules for adopting reorganisation plans in order to avoid insolvency. The draft Directive also provides rules on the related problem of interim financing. According to the draft Directive, interim financing should be encouraged and not be made subject to clawback unless parties have committed fraud or acted in bad faith. The Directive thereby fails to recognise that finance transactions are too diverse in nature to provide the company and its financial creditors with a transaction avoidance free period. If the Directive is adopted in its current form, it will open the door for opportunistic use of interim financing by both debtors and professional lenders. It will allow debtors to make final bets with other people's money and will also allow for conduit pipe financing which will reduce the exposure of existing shareholders. Lenders will also be able to make opportunistic use of the rules, most notably in the form of cross-collateralisation and aggressive loan-to-own strategies under the guise of interim financing. There are several possible solutions to the potential for opportunistic use. The courts could be involved ex ante. This would, however, turn the Directive into a fully-fledged court supervised procedure instead of the currently intended preventive restructuring procedure which avoids such court procedures. An alternative would be to simply take out the provisions on interim financing. Another possibility would be to limit the protection offered in the Directive to cases of new security against new money necessary and used for the continuation of the business.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信