透明质酸酶减轻腕管减压术局麻浸润疼痛。

{"title":"透明质酸酶减轻腕管减压术局麻浸润疼痛。","authors":"","doi":"10.46940/sjomd.02.1005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Aims: The aim of this prospective cohort study is to investigate the effect of hyaluronidase on pain experienced during local anaesthetic infiltration for carpal tunnel decompression. Methods: Two cohorts of twenty consecutive patients each underwent carpal tunnel release by a single surgeon over a five-month period. The first twenty patients received a local anaesthetic solution of lignocaine and adrenaline whilst the second group received a mixture of lignocaine, adrenaline and hyaluronidase (Hyalase®). All consecutive patients booked for simple open carpal tunnel decompression under local anaesthesia were included. Patients with other compressive neuropathies, generalised neuropathies or other concomitant hand pathologies were excluded from the study. The primary outcome measurement was pain experienced during local anaesthetic infiltration. Patients were asked to indicate the level of pain felt using a visual analogue scale (VAS) between 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain they can imagine). Secondary outcome measures were operating time, measured as tourniquet time and early complication rates. Results: Patients administered local anaesthesia with hyaluronidase experienced significantly less pain on infiltration of the proximal palm (p < 0.05) and distal palm (p < 0.05) compared to those that did not receive hyaluronidase. Infiltration of the palm was the most painful part of the procedure for both groups. There was no statistically significant difference in pain reported on initial needle insertion (p = 0.95) or on infiltration of the distal forearm (p = 0.10). No patients in either group required additional local anaesthetic. The mean tourniquet time for the group receiving local anaesthesia without hyaluronidase was 3.79 minutes (range 3 to 5 minutes, SD 0.71) versus to 3.65 minutes (range 3 to 5 minutes, SD 0.67) for the hyaluronidase group. There was therefore no significant difference in operating time between the two cohorts (p = 0.53). No early complications were observed in either groups. Conclusion: This study finds that hyaluronidase is effective at reducing pain during local anaesthetic infiltration for carpal tunnel release. We therefore recommend its routine use.","PeriodicalId":333227,"journal":{"name":"SunKrist Journal of Orthopedics and Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hyaluronidase to Reduce Pain from Local Anaesthetic Infiltration for Carpal Tunnel Decompression.\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.46940/sjomd.02.1005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Aims: The aim of this prospective cohort study is to investigate the effect of hyaluronidase on pain experienced during local anaesthetic infiltration for carpal tunnel decompression. Methods: Two cohorts of twenty consecutive patients each underwent carpal tunnel release by a single surgeon over a five-month period. The first twenty patients received a local anaesthetic solution of lignocaine and adrenaline whilst the second group received a mixture of lignocaine, adrenaline and hyaluronidase (Hyalase®). All consecutive patients booked for simple open carpal tunnel decompression under local anaesthesia were included. Patients with other compressive neuropathies, generalised neuropathies or other concomitant hand pathologies were excluded from the study. The primary outcome measurement was pain experienced during local anaesthetic infiltration. Patients were asked to indicate the level of pain felt using a visual analogue scale (VAS) between 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain they can imagine). Secondary outcome measures were operating time, measured as tourniquet time and early complication rates. Results: Patients administered local anaesthesia with hyaluronidase experienced significantly less pain on infiltration of the proximal palm (p < 0.05) and distal palm (p < 0.05) compared to those that did not receive hyaluronidase. Infiltration of the palm was the most painful part of the procedure for both groups. There was no statistically significant difference in pain reported on initial needle insertion (p = 0.95) or on infiltration of the distal forearm (p = 0.10). No patients in either group required additional local anaesthetic. The mean tourniquet time for the group receiving local anaesthesia without hyaluronidase was 3.79 minutes (range 3 to 5 minutes, SD 0.71) versus to 3.65 minutes (range 3 to 5 minutes, SD 0.67) for the hyaluronidase group. There was therefore no significant difference in operating time between the two cohorts (p = 0.53). No early complications were observed in either groups. Conclusion: This study finds that hyaluronidase is effective at reducing pain during local anaesthetic infiltration for carpal tunnel release. We therefore recommend its routine use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":333227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SunKrist Journal of Orthopedics and Musculoskeletal Disorders\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SunKrist Journal of Orthopedics and Musculoskeletal Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46940/sjomd.02.1005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SunKrist Journal of Orthopedics and Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46940/sjomd.02.1005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要目的:本前瞻性队列研究旨在探讨透明质酸酶对腕管减压术中局部麻醉浸润疼痛的影响。方法:两组共20例患者,每例患者在5个月的时间内由一名外科医生进行腕管松解术。前20名患者接受了由利多卡因和肾上腺素组成的局部麻醉溶液,而第二组患者接受了由利多卡因、肾上腺素和透明质酸酶(Hyalase®)组成的混合物。所有连续预定在局部麻醉下进行简单开放腕管减压的患者均被纳入。患有其他压迫性神经病、全身性神经病或其他伴随手病的患者被排除在研究之外。主要结果测量是局部麻醉浸润时的疼痛。患者被要求使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)在0(无疼痛)到10(他们能想象的最大疼痛)之间表示感受到的疼痛程度。次要指标是手术时间,以止血带时间和早期并发症发生率来衡量。结果:局部麻醉加透明质酸酶组患者手掌近端浸润疼痛明显减轻(p < 0.05),手掌远端浸润疼痛明显减轻(p < 0.05)。对两组患者来说,掌部浸润是手术过程中最痛苦的部分。首次针头插入(p = 0.95)或前臂远端浸润(p = 0.10)时报告的疼痛无统计学差异。两组患者均无需额外局部麻醉。无透明质酸酶局部麻醉组的平均止血带时间为3.79分钟(范围3至5分钟,SD 0.71),而透明质酸酶组的平均止血带时间为3.65分钟(范围3至5分钟,SD 0.67)。因此,两组患者的手术时间无显著差异(p = 0.53)。两组均未见早期并发症。结论:本研究发现透明质酸酶能有效减轻局部麻醉下腕管释放过程中的疼痛。因此,我们建议常规使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hyaluronidase to Reduce Pain from Local Anaesthetic Infiltration for Carpal Tunnel Decompression.
Abstract Aims: The aim of this prospective cohort study is to investigate the effect of hyaluronidase on pain experienced during local anaesthetic infiltration for carpal tunnel decompression. Methods: Two cohorts of twenty consecutive patients each underwent carpal tunnel release by a single surgeon over a five-month period. The first twenty patients received a local anaesthetic solution of lignocaine and adrenaline whilst the second group received a mixture of lignocaine, adrenaline and hyaluronidase (Hyalase®). All consecutive patients booked for simple open carpal tunnel decompression under local anaesthesia were included. Patients with other compressive neuropathies, generalised neuropathies or other concomitant hand pathologies were excluded from the study. The primary outcome measurement was pain experienced during local anaesthetic infiltration. Patients were asked to indicate the level of pain felt using a visual analogue scale (VAS) between 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain they can imagine). Secondary outcome measures were operating time, measured as tourniquet time and early complication rates. Results: Patients administered local anaesthesia with hyaluronidase experienced significantly less pain on infiltration of the proximal palm (p < 0.05) and distal palm (p < 0.05) compared to those that did not receive hyaluronidase. Infiltration of the palm was the most painful part of the procedure for both groups. There was no statistically significant difference in pain reported on initial needle insertion (p = 0.95) or on infiltration of the distal forearm (p = 0.10). No patients in either group required additional local anaesthetic. The mean tourniquet time for the group receiving local anaesthesia without hyaluronidase was 3.79 minutes (range 3 to 5 minutes, SD 0.71) versus to 3.65 minutes (range 3 to 5 minutes, SD 0.67) for the hyaluronidase group. There was therefore no significant difference in operating time between the two cohorts (p = 0.53). No early complications were observed in either groups. Conclusion: This study finds that hyaluronidase is effective at reducing pain during local anaesthetic infiltration for carpal tunnel release. We therefore recommend its routine use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信