统一图差异分析方法的初步研究

Gergõ Balogh, István Baráth
{"title":"统一图差异分析方法的初步研究","authors":"Gergõ Balogh, István Baráth","doi":"10.1109/SCAM55253.2022.00035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Researchers and IT professionals frequently use dataset comparison during software analysis. Additionally, they commonly make judgments based on discrepancies between two representations of the same item's set. To locate the error-prone areas of the system, developers may evaluate the densely linked regions of method call graphs in the context of their position in the package hierarchy tree. A universal technique for graphs, which can be utilized to unify the underlying process of discrepancy analysis, might help with these types of analyses. In this paper, we present a methodology for unified graph's discrepancy analysis, named Unigda. Its foundation is the previously established domain-specific discrepancy identification approach for cluster comparison. But to capture the similarity structures between the vertices of arbitrary graphs, we use several kinds of characteristic functions. 11Project no. TKP2021-NVA-09 has been implemented with the support provided by the Ministry of Innovation and Technology of Hungary from the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund, financed under the TKP2021-NVA funding scheme.","PeriodicalId":138287,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 22nd International Working Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation (SCAM)","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First Steps towards a Methodology for Unified Graph's Discrepancy Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Gergõ Balogh, István Baráth\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SCAM55253.2022.00035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Researchers and IT professionals frequently use dataset comparison during software analysis. Additionally, they commonly make judgments based on discrepancies between two representations of the same item's set. To locate the error-prone areas of the system, developers may evaluate the densely linked regions of method call graphs in the context of their position in the package hierarchy tree. A universal technique for graphs, which can be utilized to unify the underlying process of discrepancy analysis, might help with these types of analyses. In this paper, we present a methodology for unified graph's discrepancy analysis, named Unigda. Its foundation is the previously established domain-specific discrepancy identification approach for cluster comparison. But to capture the similarity structures between the vertices of arbitrary graphs, we use several kinds of characteristic functions. 11Project no. TKP2021-NVA-09 has been implemented with the support provided by the Ministry of Innovation and Technology of Hungary from the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund, financed under the TKP2021-NVA funding scheme.\",\"PeriodicalId\":138287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE 22nd International Working Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation (SCAM)\",\"volume\":\"96 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE 22nd International Working Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation (SCAM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SCAM55253.2022.00035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 22nd International Working Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation (SCAM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SCAM55253.2022.00035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究人员和IT专业人员在软件分析过程中经常使用数据集比较。此外,他们通常根据同一项目集合的两种表示之间的差异做出判断。为了定位系统中容易出错的区域,开发人员可以根据方法调用图在包层次结构树中的位置来评估方法调用图的密集连接区域。一种通用的图技术可以用来统一差异分析的底层过程,它可能有助于这些类型的分析。本文提出了一种统一图的差异分析方法Unigda。它的基础是先前建立的用于聚类比较的特定领域差异识别方法。但是为了捕捉任意图的顶点之间的相似结构,我们使用了几种特征函数。11个项目没有。TKP2021-NVA-09在匈牙利创新技术部的国家研究、发展和创新基金的支持下实施,该基金由TKP2021-NVA资助计划资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
First Steps towards a Methodology for Unified Graph's Discrepancy Analysis
Researchers and IT professionals frequently use dataset comparison during software analysis. Additionally, they commonly make judgments based on discrepancies between two representations of the same item's set. To locate the error-prone areas of the system, developers may evaluate the densely linked regions of method call graphs in the context of their position in the package hierarchy tree. A universal technique for graphs, which can be utilized to unify the underlying process of discrepancy analysis, might help with these types of analyses. In this paper, we present a methodology for unified graph's discrepancy analysis, named Unigda. Its foundation is the previously established domain-specific discrepancy identification approach for cluster comparison. But to capture the similarity structures between the vertices of arbitrary graphs, we use several kinds of characteristic functions. 11Project no. TKP2021-NVA-09 has been implemented with the support provided by the Ministry of Innovation and Technology of Hungary from the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund, financed under the TKP2021-NVA funding scheme.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信