光线追踪与反向蒙特卡罗方法的比较:在GEO轨道上的应用

2019 19th European Conference on Radiation and Its Effects on Components and Systems (RADECS) Pub Date : 2019-09-01 DOI:10.1109/radecs47380.2019.9745642

R. Benacquista, P. Pourrouquet, A. Varotsou, R. Mangeret, Catherine Barillot, G. Santin, Hugh Evans

{"title":"光线追踪与反向蒙特卡罗方法的比较:在GEO轨道上的应用","authors":"R. Benacquista, P. Pourrouquet, A. Varotsou, R. Mangeret, Catherine Barillot, G. Santin, Hugh Evans","doi":"10.1109/radecs47380.2019.9745642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ray-Tracing and Reverse Monte-Carlo are the two most widely used methods to estimate the dose at component level for space applications. The Ray-Tracing method is fast but presents intrinsic limitations while the Reverse Monte-Carlo method is more precise but more time consuming. In the frame of the ESA GTREFF project, a statistical comparison between these two methods has been performed, based on realistic satellite models for GEO orbit and using FASTRAD®. Results are presented and analyzed.","PeriodicalId":269018,"journal":{"name":"2019 19th European Conference on Radiation and Its Effects on Components and Systems (RADECS)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Ray-Tracing and Reverse Monte-Carlo Methods: Application to GEO orbit\",\"authors\":\"R. Benacquista, P. Pourrouquet, A. Varotsou, R. Mangeret, Catherine Barillot, G. Santin, Hugh Evans\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/radecs47380.2019.9745642\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ray-Tracing and Reverse Monte-Carlo are the two most widely used methods to estimate the dose at component level for space applications. The Ray-Tracing method is fast but presents intrinsic limitations while the Reverse Monte-Carlo method is more precise but more time consuming. In the frame of the ESA GTREFF project, a statistical comparison between these two methods has been performed, based on realistic satellite models for GEO orbit and using FASTRAD®. Results are presented and analyzed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":269018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 19th European Conference on Radiation and Its Effects on Components and Systems (RADECS)\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 19th European Conference on Radiation and Its Effects on Components and Systems (RADECS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/radecs47380.2019.9745642\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 19th European Conference on Radiation and Its Effects on Components and Systems (RADECS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/radecs47380.2019.9745642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

射线追踪和反向蒙特卡罗是空间应用中最广泛使用的两种估算分量水平剂量的方法。光线追踪法速度快，但存在固有的局限性，而反向蒙特卡罗法精度高，但耗时长。在ESA GTREFF项目的框架下，基于GEO轨道的实际卫星模型并使用FASTRAD®，对这两种方法进行了统计比较。给出了结果并进行了分析。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Comparison of Ray-Tracing and Reverse Monte-Carlo Methods: Application to GEO orbit

Ray-Tracing and Reverse Monte-Carlo are the two most widely used methods to estimate the dose at component level for space applications. The Ray-Tracing method is fast but presents intrinsic limitations while the Reverse Monte-Carlo method is more precise but more time consuming. In the frame of the ESA GTREFF project, a statistical comparison between these two methods has been performed, based on realistic satellite models for GEO orbit and using FASTRAD®. Results are presented and analyzed.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

2019 19th European Conference on Radiation and Its Effects on Components and Systems (RADECS)

自引率

0.00%

发文量