用质量分析模型集成软件体系结构建模方法的探索

Liliana Dobrica
{"title":"用质量分析模型集成软件体系结构建模方法的探索","authors":"Liliana Dobrica","doi":"10.1109/WICSA.2011.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the important benefits of model-to-model transformation is that it allows architects to design iteratively by analyzing and studying alternative or optimal solutions without redesign of the software architecture models or quality analytic models. The main contribution of this work is the presentation of five recently approaches based on the definition of a framework which applies separation of concerns in viewpoints and perspectives. The framework definition identifies viewpoints and their sets of concerns regarding the approaches achieving the goal of integration and interoperability of tools in a model-driven and quality-driven software architecture development. Each approach presentation is a multiple views description, where a view conforms to a viewpoint. The quality of each approach depends on the perspective under which the approach is analyzed. By applying various perspectives on the views composing each approach a software architect or a modeler can select the most appropriate one. Also based on this framework of presentation, the study identifies a current state of the research in the domain defined by these representative approaches, existent limitations and future research directions.","PeriodicalId":234615,"journal":{"name":"2011 Ninth Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Approaches of Integration Software Architecture Modeling with Quality Analysis Models\",\"authors\":\"Liliana Dobrica\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WICSA.2011.23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the important benefits of model-to-model transformation is that it allows architects to design iteratively by analyzing and studying alternative or optimal solutions without redesign of the software architecture models or quality analytic models. The main contribution of this work is the presentation of five recently approaches based on the definition of a framework which applies separation of concerns in viewpoints and perspectives. The framework definition identifies viewpoints and their sets of concerns regarding the approaches achieving the goal of integration and interoperability of tools in a model-driven and quality-driven software architecture development. Each approach presentation is a multiple views description, where a view conforms to a viewpoint. The quality of each approach depends on the perspective under which the approach is analyzed. By applying various perspectives on the views composing each approach a software architect or a modeler can select the most appropriate one. Also based on this framework of presentation, the study identifies a current state of the research in the domain defined by these representative approaches, existent limitations and future research directions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":234615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 Ninth Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 Ninth Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WICSA.2011.23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 Ninth Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WICSA.2011.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

模型到模型转换的一个重要好处是,它允许架构师通过分析和研究可选的或最优的解决方案进行迭代设计,而无需重新设计软件架构模型或质量分析模型。这项工作的主要贡献是基于在视点和视角中应用关注点分离的框架的定义,介绍了最近的五种方法。框架定义确定了关于在模型驱动和质量驱动的软件架构开发中实现工具的集成和互操作性目标的方法的观点和它们的关注点集。每个方法表示都是一个多视图描述,其中一个视图符合一个视点。每种方法的质量取决于分析方法的视角。通过对组成每种方法的视图应用不同的透视图,软件架构师或建模师可以选择最合适的一个。在此框架下,本研究明确了这些代表性方法所定义的领域的研究现状、存在的局限性和未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring Approaches of Integration Software Architecture Modeling with Quality Analysis Models
One of the important benefits of model-to-model transformation is that it allows architects to design iteratively by analyzing and studying alternative or optimal solutions without redesign of the software architecture models or quality analytic models. The main contribution of this work is the presentation of five recently approaches based on the definition of a framework which applies separation of concerns in viewpoints and perspectives. The framework definition identifies viewpoints and their sets of concerns regarding the approaches achieving the goal of integration and interoperability of tools in a model-driven and quality-driven software architecture development. Each approach presentation is a multiple views description, where a view conforms to a viewpoint. The quality of each approach depends on the perspective under which the approach is analyzed. By applying various perspectives on the views composing each approach a software architect or a modeler can select the most appropriate one. Also based on this framework of presentation, the study identifies a current state of the research in the domain defined by these representative approaches, existent limitations and future research directions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信