刚果民主共和国中部Luki生物圈保护区balsamifera (Vermoesen) Bretteler样地辅助自然再生和碳储量评价

T. Lubalega
{"title":"刚果民主共和国中部Luki生物圈保护区balsamifera (Vermoesen) Bretteler样地辅助自然再生和碳储量评价","authors":"T. Lubalega","doi":"10.23880/jenr-16000272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extensive programs of enrichment through natural assisted regeneration were implemented between 1946 and 1959 by INEAC (Institute National pour étude Agronomique du Congo belge). He has conducted several studies for the implementation of silvicultural techniques in tropical environments, particularly in the Luki Biosphere Reserve (RBL) in the DRC. The Prioria balsamifera natural assisted regeneration (RNA) plots were part of the various silvicultural treatments implemented between 1956 and 1962 after clear-cutting. Five decades after their establishment, no evaluation has been undertaken. The objective of this study is to evaluate the natural assisted regeneration in the P. balsamifera plots and to account for the carbon sequestered in the P. balsamifera RNA after clear-cutting. The methodological approach to floristic, dendrometric and allometric inventories was used to determine the specific richness and diversity of the different study plots and to account for the carbon of the RNA biomass of the fifteen sampling plots of 0,25 ha each at three sites: Camp1; Camp2 and the RBL Post. The study revealed a higher density per hectare in the Camp1 plot, almost double the last two plots of the sampling. The density / ha varied between 380 to 980 stems / ha. The same trend was observed on the basal area (m2 / ha). This varied between 43 and 68 m2 / ha. The Shannon index used for the analysis of wealth and specific diversity varied between 0.8 and 1.6. The Camp1 plot showed little diversity compared to other plots of sampling. The mean téq CO2 / ha values in our fifteen sample plots (Camp1, amp2, RBL station) are estimated to be 1793.96 téq CO2 / ha, 985.28 teqCO2 / ha and 1305.8 téq CO2 / ha respectively for the three plots.","PeriodicalId":186239,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ecology & Natural Resources","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of assisted natural regeneration and stored carbon in Prioria balsamifera (Vermoesen) Bretteler plots of the Luki Biosphere Reserve in Central Kongo, Democratic Republic of Congo\",\"authors\":\"T. Lubalega\",\"doi\":\"10.23880/jenr-16000272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Extensive programs of enrichment through natural assisted regeneration were implemented between 1946 and 1959 by INEAC (Institute National pour étude Agronomique du Congo belge). He has conducted several studies for the implementation of silvicultural techniques in tropical environments, particularly in the Luki Biosphere Reserve (RBL) in the DRC. The Prioria balsamifera natural assisted regeneration (RNA) plots were part of the various silvicultural treatments implemented between 1956 and 1962 after clear-cutting. Five decades after their establishment, no evaluation has been undertaken. The objective of this study is to evaluate the natural assisted regeneration in the P. balsamifera plots and to account for the carbon sequestered in the P. balsamifera RNA after clear-cutting. The methodological approach to floristic, dendrometric and allometric inventories was used to determine the specific richness and diversity of the different study plots and to account for the carbon of the RNA biomass of the fifteen sampling plots of 0,25 ha each at three sites: Camp1; Camp2 and the RBL Post. The study revealed a higher density per hectare in the Camp1 plot, almost double the last two plots of the sampling. The density / ha varied between 380 to 980 stems / ha. The same trend was observed on the basal area (m2 / ha). This varied between 43 and 68 m2 / ha. The Shannon index used for the analysis of wealth and specific diversity varied between 0.8 and 1.6. The Camp1 plot showed little diversity compared to other plots of sampling. The mean téq CO2 / ha values in our fifteen sample plots (Camp1, amp2, RBL station) are estimated to be 1793.96 téq CO2 / ha, 985.28 teqCO2 / ha and 1305.8 téq CO2 / ha respectively for the three plots.\",\"PeriodicalId\":186239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ecology & Natural Resources\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ecology & Natural Resources\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23880/jenr-16000272\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ecology & Natural Resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23880/jenr-16000272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1946年至1959年,刚果国家农业研究所(INEAC)实施了大量通过自然辅助再生的浓缩计划。他进行了几项关于在热带环境中实施造林技术的研究,特别是在刚果民主共和国的Luki生物圈保护区(RBL)。香茅自然辅助再生(RNA)地块是1956年至1962年采伐后实施的各种造林处理的一部分。在它们成立五十年后,没有进行任何评价。本研究的目的是评估香茅地的自然辅助再生,并解释清伐后香茅RNA中的碳固存。采用植物区系、树木和异速生长调查的方法,确定了不同研究样地的具体丰富度和多样性,并计算了15个样地的RNA生物量碳,每个样地为0,25 ha,位于三个地点:Camp1;2号营地和RBL哨所。研究显示,Camp1小区每公顷的密度更高,几乎是前两个采样小区的两倍。密度在380 ~ 980茎/ ha之间。基底面积(m2 / ha)也有相同的变化趋势。这在43到68平方米/公顷之间变化。用于分析财富和特定多样性的香农指数在0.8到1.6之间变化。与其他样地相比,Camp1样地的多样性较小。15个样地(Camp1、amp2、RBL站)的平均CO2 / ha值分别为1793.96、985.28和1305.8 tqco2 / ha。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of assisted natural regeneration and stored carbon in Prioria balsamifera (Vermoesen) Bretteler plots of the Luki Biosphere Reserve in Central Kongo, Democratic Republic of Congo
Extensive programs of enrichment through natural assisted regeneration were implemented between 1946 and 1959 by INEAC (Institute National pour étude Agronomique du Congo belge). He has conducted several studies for the implementation of silvicultural techniques in tropical environments, particularly in the Luki Biosphere Reserve (RBL) in the DRC. The Prioria balsamifera natural assisted regeneration (RNA) plots were part of the various silvicultural treatments implemented between 1956 and 1962 after clear-cutting. Five decades after their establishment, no evaluation has been undertaken. The objective of this study is to evaluate the natural assisted regeneration in the P. balsamifera plots and to account for the carbon sequestered in the P. balsamifera RNA after clear-cutting. The methodological approach to floristic, dendrometric and allometric inventories was used to determine the specific richness and diversity of the different study plots and to account for the carbon of the RNA biomass of the fifteen sampling plots of 0,25 ha each at three sites: Camp1; Camp2 and the RBL Post. The study revealed a higher density per hectare in the Camp1 plot, almost double the last two plots of the sampling. The density / ha varied between 380 to 980 stems / ha. The same trend was observed on the basal area (m2 / ha). This varied between 43 and 68 m2 / ha. The Shannon index used for the analysis of wealth and specific diversity varied between 0.8 and 1.6. The Camp1 plot showed little diversity compared to other plots of sampling. The mean téq CO2 / ha values in our fifteen sample plots (Camp1, amp2, RBL station) are estimated to be 1793.96 téq CO2 / ha, 985.28 teqCO2 / ha and 1305.8 téq CO2 / ha respectively for the three plots.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信