不明原因的发烧。

J C Gartner
{"title":"不明原因的发烧。","authors":"J C Gartner","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>FUO is an uncommon problem in pediatric patients if one uses a strict definition of at least 2 weeks of fever. Perhaps the best definition, as suggested by Lorin and Feigin, is more than 1 week of fever and a negative initial evaluation, including examination and preliminary laboratory results. Most patients, especially younger ones, will spontaneously improve or have common disorders, usually respiratory-related infections. Most patients will have uncommon manifestations of more commonly recognized disorders. Mortality rates, even in those series that include a week in the hospital without a diagnosis, are 15% to 20% at maximum--half that seen in most series of adult patients. Common mistakes are failure to document fever, failure to perform a complete history or physical examination, a shotgun approach that uses the laboratory to make diagnoses, and overuse or inappropriate use of newer imaging techniques in an undirected fashion. Patience, persistence, repeated histories and physical examinations, and continued observation offer the best chance of making a diagnosis in difficult cases. In the current decade, we continue to learn about new manifestations of old disorders--cat-scratch disease, Kawasaki disease, neonatal syphilis, and Epstein-Barr virus infection are examples. The use of older and well-established methods (history and physical examination) and the addition of newer techniques (ultrasound, CT, MRI, etc.) to pursue suggested diagnoses offer the best current approaches to the patient with prolonged and unexplained fever.</p>","PeriodicalId":76980,"journal":{"name":"Advances in pediatric infectious diseases","volume":"7 ","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fever of unknown origin.\",\"authors\":\"J C Gartner\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>FUO is an uncommon problem in pediatric patients if one uses a strict definition of at least 2 weeks of fever. Perhaps the best definition, as suggested by Lorin and Feigin, is more than 1 week of fever and a negative initial evaluation, including examination and preliminary laboratory results. Most patients, especially younger ones, will spontaneously improve or have common disorders, usually respiratory-related infections. Most patients will have uncommon manifestations of more commonly recognized disorders. Mortality rates, even in those series that include a week in the hospital without a diagnosis, are 15% to 20% at maximum--half that seen in most series of adult patients. Common mistakes are failure to document fever, failure to perform a complete history or physical examination, a shotgun approach that uses the laboratory to make diagnoses, and overuse or inappropriate use of newer imaging techniques in an undirected fashion. Patience, persistence, repeated histories and physical examinations, and continued observation offer the best chance of making a diagnosis in difficult cases. In the current decade, we continue to learn about new manifestations of old disorders--cat-scratch disease, Kawasaki disease, neonatal syphilis, and Epstein-Barr virus infection are examples. The use of older and well-established methods (history and physical examination) and the addition of newer techniques (ultrasound, CT, MRI, etc.) to pursue suggested diagnoses offer the best current approaches to the patient with prolonged and unexplained fever.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76980,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in pediatric infectious diseases\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"1-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in pediatric infectious diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in pediatric infectious diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如果一个人使用至少2周发烧的严格定义,在儿科患者中,FUO是一个罕见的问题。正如Lorin和Feigin所建议的那样,也许最好的定义是发烧超过1周,并且初步评估为阴性,包括检查和初步实验室结果。大多数患者,特别是年轻患者,会自发改善或出现常见疾病,通常是呼吸道相关感染。大多数患者会有更常见的疾病的不常见表现。即使在那些包括在医院住了一周而没有诊断的系列中,死亡率也最多为15%至20%,是大多数成年患者系列的一半。常见的错误是没有记录发烧,没有进行完整的病史或体格检查,使用实验室进行诊断的霰弹枪方法,以及以无指导的方式过度使用或不适当使用较新的成像技术。耐心、坚持、反复的病史和体检,以及持续的观察,是在困难病例中做出诊断的最佳机会。在目前的十年中,我们继续了解旧疾病的新表现——猫抓病、川崎病、新生儿梅毒和爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒感染就是例子。使用较老的和完善的方法(病史和体格检查)和添加较新的技术(超声,CT, MRI等)来进行建议的诊断,为长期和不明原因发烧的患者提供了目前最好的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fever of unknown origin.

FUO is an uncommon problem in pediatric patients if one uses a strict definition of at least 2 weeks of fever. Perhaps the best definition, as suggested by Lorin and Feigin, is more than 1 week of fever and a negative initial evaluation, including examination and preliminary laboratory results. Most patients, especially younger ones, will spontaneously improve or have common disorders, usually respiratory-related infections. Most patients will have uncommon manifestations of more commonly recognized disorders. Mortality rates, even in those series that include a week in the hospital without a diagnosis, are 15% to 20% at maximum--half that seen in most series of adult patients. Common mistakes are failure to document fever, failure to perform a complete history or physical examination, a shotgun approach that uses the laboratory to make diagnoses, and overuse or inappropriate use of newer imaging techniques in an undirected fashion. Patience, persistence, repeated histories and physical examinations, and continued observation offer the best chance of making a diagnosis in difficult cases. In the current decade, we continue to learn about new manifestations of old disorders--cat-scratch disease, Kawasaki disease, neonatal syphilis, and Epstein-Barr virus infection are examples. The use of older and well-established methods (history and physical examination) and the addition of newer techniques (ultrasound, CT, MRI, etc.) to pursue suggested diagnoses offer the best current approaches to the patient with prolonged and unexplained fever.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信