双重意识:战前奴隶叙事中的主体性与民族性

Fuqiang Hao
{"title":"双重意识:战前奴隶叙事中的主体性与民族性","authors":"Fuqiang Hao","doi":"10.38007/proceedings.0001895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are two sets of systems in terms of slavery in antebellum America, namely, the northern free states and the southern slave states. The plantation systems in the south and the industrial systems of the north might be said to conflict with each other. Slave narratives written by fugitives witness the different systems of miserable life in slave states and their comparatively free life in the north. In this paper, through reading of slave narratives before the Civil War, I want to discuss how the two economic and political systems in the slave states and free states coexist and conflict with each other, and, importantly, how slaves adopted strategies to convert the loopholes of the slavery to win their freedom. By taking the “double consciousness” as a framework and exploring its metaphorical meanings, I analyze a number of psychological, performance and text moments where the authors of slave narratives explore the “two-ness” created by the systems of slavery. 1. Double Consciousness and Slave Narratives in the Antebellum U.S. In The Souls of Black Folk (1903), W. E. B. Du Bois mentions the double consciousness and “twoness” of the blacks in the United States: It is a peculiar sensation, this double consciousness, this sense of always looking at one’s self through the eyes of others, of measuring one’s soul by the tape of a world that looks on in amused attempt and pity. One ever feels his two-ness, —an American, a Negro; two souls, two thoughts, two unreconciled strivings; two warring ideals in one dark body, whose dogged strength alone keeps it from being torn asunder. [1] Du Bois’s remarks on the two selves of blacks offers an insightful perspective to analyze the ramifications of psychological personality that slavery and racism exert upon the African American people. By adopting a Hegelian binary opposition perspective, the “two warring ideals in one dark body” admits the particular dilemma that blacks face. As is written by David W. Blight in his introduction to The Souls of Black Folk, Du Bois “does search for the spirit of the Age of Emancipation, for the searing ironies in America’s promise, and for the troubled uncertainties of the post-freedom generations of black people” [2]. The concept of “double consciousness” provides an important framework for numerous interpretations regarding the African Americans’ role for the development of American culture. The two-ness of black people, according to Du Bois, however, is a more general cultural unconsciousness of the whole black people in the 19th and 20th America, with its focus more on the period of Jim Crow. My focus here is more specific to the antebellum slave narrative, where the two systems juxtapose with each other and the slaves are themselves a direct victim of the slavery. Slaves’ dividing subjectivities, to some extent, are closely related with two systems, the liberal system and the slavery one. Under the two conflicting systems, African Americana slaves, and even slaveholders, are divided into two subjectivities. People have to act differently and even change themselves to adapt to the differences of systems. To survive, slaves have to use a number of different and even conflicting strategies. 2021 International Conference Education and Management (ICEM2021)","PeriodicalId":227548,"journal":{"name":"2021 International Conference Education and Management (ICEM2021)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Double Consciousness: Subjectivity and Nationhood in the Antebellum Slave Narrative\",\"authors\":\"Fuqiang Hao\",\"doi\":\"10.38007/proceedings.0001895\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are two sets of systems in terms of slavery in antebellum America, namely, the northern free states and the southern slave states. The plantation systems in the south and the industrial systems of the north might be said to conflict with each other. Slave narratives written by fugitives witness the different systems of miserable life in slave states and their comparatively free life in the north. In this paper, through reading of slave narratives before the Civil War, I want to discuss how the two economic and political systems in the slave states and free states coexist and conflict with each other, and, importantly, how slaves adopted strategies to convert the loopholes of the slavery to win their freedom. By taking the “double consciousness” as a framework and exploring its metaphorical meanings, I analyze a number of psychological, performance and text moments where the authors of slave narratives explore the “two-ness” created by the systems of slavery. 1. Double Consciousness and Slave Narratives in the Antebellum U.S. In The Souls of Black Folk (1903), W. E. B. Du Bois mentions the double consciousness and “twoness” of the blacks in the United States: It is a peculiar sensation, this double consciousness, this sense of always looking at one’s self through the eyes of others, of measuring one’s soul by the tape of a world that looks on in amused attempt and pity. One ever feels his two-ness, —an American, a Negro; two souls, two thoughts, two unreconciled strivings; two warring ideals in one dark body, whose dogged strength alone keeps it from being torn asunder. [1] Du Bois’s remarks on the two selves of blacks offers an insightful perspective to analyze the ramifications of psychological personality that slavery and racism exert upon the African American people. By adopting a Hegelian binary opposition perspective, the “two warring ideals in one dark body” admits the particular dilemma that blacks face. As is written by David W. Blight in his introduction to The Souls of Black Folk, Du Bois “does search for the spirit of the Age of Emancipation, for the searing ironies in America’s promise, and for the troubled uncertainties of the post-freedom generations of black people” [2]. The concept of “double consciousness” provides an important framework for numerous interpretations regarding the African Americans’ role for the development of American culture. The two-ness of black people, according to Du Bois, however, is a more general cultural unconsciousness of the whole black people in the 19th and 20th America, with its focus more on the period of Jim Crow. My focus here is more specific to the antebellum slave narrative, where the two systems juxtapose with each other and the slaves are themselves a direct victim of the slavery. Slaves’ dividing subjectivities, to some extent, are closely related with two systems, the liberal system and the slavery one. Under the two conflicting systems, African Americana slaves, and even slaveholders, are divided into two subjectivities. People have to act differently and even change themselves to adapt to the differences of systems. To survive, slaves have to use a number of different and even conflicting strategies. 2021 International Conference Education and Management (ICEM2021)\",\"PeriodicalId\":227548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 International Conference Education and Management (ICEM2021)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 International Conference Education and Management (ICEM2021)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.38007/proceedings.0001895\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 International Conference Education and Management (ICEM2021)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38007/proceedings.0001895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

南北战争前的美国有两套奴隶制制度,即北方自由州和南方奴隶制州。南方的种植园制度和北方的工业制度可以说是相互冲突的。逃亡者所写的奴隶叙事见证了奴隶州不同的悲惨生活制度和他们在北方相对自由的生活。在这篇论文中,我想通过阅读内战前的奴隶叙事,来讨论奴隶州和自由州的两种经济和政治制度是如何共存和相互冲突的,更重要的是,奴隶们是如何采取策略,利用奴隶制的漏洞来赢得自由的。本文以“双重意识”为框架,探讨其隐喻意义,分析了一些心理、表演和文本时刻,在这些时刻,奴隶叙事的作者探索了奴隶制制度所创造的“两重性”。1. 在《黑人的灵魂》(1903)中,w·e·b·杜波依斯提到了美国黑人的双重意识和“双重性”:这是一种特殊的感觉,这种双重意识,这种总是通过别人的眼睛来看待自己的感觉,用世界的带子来衡量自己的灵魂,这个世界以有趣的尝试和怜悯的目光注视着你。一个人总是感到自己的两面性——一个美国人,一个黑人;两个灵魂,两种思想,两种不调和的努力;两种敌对的理想在一个黑暗的身体里,只有顽强的力量才能使它免于被撕裂。[1]杜波依斯对黑人两种自我的评论提供了一个深刻的视角来分析奴隶制和种族主义对非裔美国人心理人格的影响。采用黑格尔二元对立的视角,“一黑体两战”承认了黑人所面临的特殊困境。正如大卫·w·布莱特(David W. Blight)在《黑人的灵魂》(The Souls of Black Folk)的引言中所写的那样,杜波依斯“确实在寻找解放时代的精神,在美国的承诺中寻找灼热的讽刺,以及在后自由时代的几代黑人所面临的困扰和不确定性”[2]。“双重意识”概念为解读非裔美国人在美国文化发展中的作用提供了一个重要框架。然而,在杜波依斯看来,黑人的两面性是19世纪和20世纪美国全体黑人的一种更普遍的文化无意识,其焦点更多地集中在吉姆·克劳时期。我在这里更具体地关注内战前的奴隶叙事,这两种制度相互并列,奴隶本身就是奴隶制的直接受害者。奴隶的主体性划分在一定程度上与自由主义和奴隶制两种制度密切相关。在两种相互冲突的制度下,非裔美国奴隶,甚至奴隶主,被划分为两种主体性。人们必须采取不同的行动,甚至改变自己,以适应系统的差异。为了生存,奴隶们不得不使用许多不同的甚至相互冲突的策略。2021年教育与管理国际会议(ICEM2021)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Double Consciousness: Subjectivity and Nationhood in the Antebellum Slave Narrative
There are two sets of systems in terms of slavery in antebellum America, namely, the northern free states and the southern slave states. The plantation systems in the south and the industrial systems of the north might be said to conflict with each other. Slave narratives written by fugitives witness the different systems of miserable life in slave states and their comparatively free life in the north. In this paper, through reading of slave narratives before the Civil War, I want to discuss how the two economic and political systems in the slave states and free states coexist and conflict with each other, and, importantly, how slaves adopted strategies to convert the loopholes of the slavery to win their freedom. By taking the “double consciousness” as a framework and exploring its metaphorical meanings, I analyze a number of psychological, performance and text moments where the authors of slave narratives explore the “two-ness” created by the systems of slavery. 1. Double Consciousness and Slave Narratives in the Antebellum U.S. In The Souls of Black Folk (1903), W. E. B. Du Bois mentions the double consciousness and “twoness” of the blacks in the United States: It is a peculiar sensation, this double consciousness, this sense of always looking at one’s self through the eyes of others, of measuring one’s soul by the tape of a world that looks on in amused attempt and pity. One ever feels his two-ness, —an American, a Negro; two souls, two thoughts, two unreconciled strivings; two warring ideals in one dark body, whose dogged strength alone keeps it from being torn asunder. [1] Du Bois’s remarks on the two selves of blacks offers an insightful perspective to analyze the ramifications of psychological personality that slavery and racism exert upon the African American people. By adopting a Hegelian binary opposition perspective, the “two warring ideals in one dark body” admits the particular dilemma that blacks face. As is written by David W. Blight in his introduction to The Souls of Black Folk, Du Bois “does search for the spirit of the Age of Emancipation, for the searing ironies in America’s promise, and for the troubled uncertainties of the post-freedom generations of black people” [2]. The concept of “double consciousness” provides an important framework for numerous interpretations regarding the African Americans’ role for the development of American culture. The two-ness of black people, according to Du Bois, however, is a more general cultural unconsciousness of the whole black people in the 19th and 20th America, with its focus more on the period of Jim Crow. My focus here is more specific to the antebellum slave narrative, where the two systems juxtapose with each other and the slaves are themselves a direct victim of the slavery. Slaves’ dividing subjectivities, to some extent, are closely related with two systems, the liberal system and the slavery one. Under the two conflicting systems, African Americana slaves, and even slaveholders, are divided into two subjectivities. People have to act differently and even change themselves to adapt to the differences of systems. To survive, slaves have to use a number of different and even conflicting strategies. 2021 International Conference Education and Management (ICEM2021)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信