探索在Tor中扩展速率限制的潜在好处:缓慢而稳定地赢得与Tortoise的比赛

W. Moore, Chris Wacek, M. Sherr
{"title":"探索在Tor中扩展速率限制的潜在好处:缓慢而稳定地赢得与Tortoise的比赛","authors":"W. Moore, Chris Wacek, M. Sherr","doi":"10.1145/2076732.2076762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tor is a volunteer-operated network of application-layer relays that enables users to communicate privately and anonymously. Unfortunately, Tor often exhibits poor performance due to congestion caused by the unbalanced ratio of clients to available relays, as well as a disproportionately high consumption of network capacity by a small fraction of filesharing users.\n This paper argues the very counterintuitive notion that slowing down traffic on Tor will increase the bandwidth capacity of the network and consequently improve the experience of interactive web users. We introduce Tortoise, a system for rate limiting Tor at its ingress points. We demonstrate that Tortoise incurs little penalty for interactive web users, while significantly decreasing the throughput for filesharers. Our techniques provide incentives to filesharers to configure their Tor clients to also relay traffic, which in turn improves the network's overall performance. We present large-scale emulation results that indicate that interactive users will achieve a significant speedup if even a small fraction of clients opt to run relays.","PeriodicalId":397003,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Computer Systems Architecture Conference","volume":"9399 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"43","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the potential benefits of expanded rate limiting in Tor: slow and steady wins the race with Tortoise\",\"authors\":\"W. Moore, Chris Wacek, M. Sherr\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2076732.2076762\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Tor is a volunteer-operated network of application-layer relays that enables users to communicate privately and anonymously. Unfortunately, Tor often exhibits poor performance due to congestion caused by the unbalanced ratio of clients to available relays, as well as a disproportionately high consumption of network capacity by a small fraction of filesharing users.\\n This paper argues the very counterintuitive notion that slowing down traffic on Tor will increase the bandwidth capacity of the network and consequently improve the experience of interactive web users. We introduce Tortoise, a system for rate limiting Tor at its ingress points. We demonstrate that Tortoise incurs little penalty for interactive web users, while significantly decreasing the throughput for filesharers. Our techniques provide incentives to filesharers to configure their Tor clients to also relay traffic, which in turn improves the network's overall performance. We present large-scale emulation results that indicate that interactive users will achieve a significant speedup if even a small fraction of clients opt to run relays.\",\"PeriodicalId\":397003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Computer Systems Architecture Conference\",\"volume\":\"9399 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"43\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Computer Systems Architecture Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2076732.2076762\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Computer Systems Architecture Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2076732.2076762","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43

摘要

Tor是一个志愿操作的应用层中继网络,使用户能够私下和匿名地进行通信。不幸的是,由于客户机与可用中继的比例不平衡导致拥塞,以及一小部分文件共享用户不成比例地高消耗网络容量,Tor经常表现出较差的性能。本文论证了一个非常违反直觉的概念,即减缓Tor上的流量将增加网络的带宽容量,从而改善交互式网络用户的体验。我们介绍了Tortoise,一个在其入口点限制速率的系统。我们证明了Tortoise对交互式web用户的影响很小,但却显著降低了文件共享器的吞吐量。我们的技术激励文件共享者配置他们的Tor客户端也中继流量,这反过来提高了网络的整体性能。我们提供的大规模仿真结果表明,即使只有一小部分客户端选择运行中继,交互式用户也将获得显着的加速。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the potential benefits of expanded rate limiting in Tor: slow and steady wins the race with Tortoise
Tor is a volunteer-operated network of application-layer relays that enables users to communicate privately and anonymously. Unfortunately, Tor often exhibits poor performance due to congestion caused by the unbalanced ratio of clients to available relays, as well as a disproportionately high consumption of network capacity by a small fraction of filesharing users. This paper argues the very counterintuitive notion that slowing down traffic on Tor will increase the bandwidth capacity of the network and consequently improve the experience of interactive web users. We introduce Tortoise, a system for rate limiting Tor at its ingress points. We demonstrate that Tortoise incurs little penalty for interactive web users, while significantly decreasing the throughput for filesharers. Our techniques provide incentives to filesharers to configure their Tor clients to also relay traffic, which in turn improves the network's overall performance. We present large-scale emulation results that indicate that interactive users will achieve a significant speedup if even a small fraction of clients opt to run relays.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信