主成分分析作为一种检测神经元集合的方法的局限性

C. S. Deolindo, A. Kunicki, F. Brasil, R. Moioli
{"title":"主成分分析作为一种检测神经元集合的方法的局限性","authors":"C. S. Deolindo, A. Kunicki, F. Brasil, R. Moioli","doi":"10.1109/HealthCom.2014.7001808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The anatomical and functional characterization of neuronal assemblies (NAs) is a major challenge in neuroscience. Principal component analysis (PCA) is a widely used method for feature detection, however, when dealing with neuronal data analysis, its limitations have not yet been fully understood. Our work complements previous PCA studies which, in general, characterise NAs based solely on excitatory neuronal interactions. We analysed the performance of PCA in two neglected scenarios: assemblies containing patterns of neural interactions (1) with inhibition and (2) with delays. The analyses considered two types of artificially generated data, one drawn from a traditional Poissonian model, and the other drawn from a latent multivariate Gaussian model; in both models, data from a behaving Wistar rat was used for parameter tuning. Our results highlight scenarios in which neglecting complex interactions between neurons can lead to false conclusions when using PCA to detect NAs. Also, we reinforce the importance of more realistic simulations in the evaluation of neuronal signal processing algorithms.","PeriodicalId":269964,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 16th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Limitations of principal component analysis as a method to detect neuronal assemblies\",\"authors\":\"C. S. Deolindo, A. Kunicki, F. Brasil, R. Moioli\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HealthCom.2014.7001808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The anatomical and functional characterization of neuronal assemblies (NAs) is a major challenge in neuroscience. Principal component analysis (PCA) is a widely used method for feature detection, however, when dealing with neuronal data analysis, its limitations have not yet been fully understood. Our work complements previous PCA studies which, in general, characterise NAs based solely on excitatory neuronal interactions. We analysed the performance of PCA in two neglected scenarios: assemblies containing patterns of neural interactions (1) with inhibition and (2) with delays. The analyses considered two types of artificially generated data, one drawn from a traditional Poissonian model, and the other drawn from a latent multivariate Gaussian model; in both models, data from a behaving Wistar rat was used for parameter tuning. Our results highlight scenarios in which neglecting complex interactions between neurons can lead to false conclusions when using PCA to detect NAs. Also, we reinforce the importance of more realistic simulations in the evaluation of neuronal signal processing algorithms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":269964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE 16th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE 16th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HealthCom.2014.7001808\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE 16th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HealthCom.2014.7001808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

神经细胞组装(NAs)的解剖和功能表征是神经科学的一个主要挑战。主成分分析(PCA)是一种广泛使用的特征检测方法,但在处理神经元数据分析时,其局限性尚未得到充分认识。我们的工作补充了以前的PCA研究,一般来说,仅仅基于兴奋性神经元相互作用来表征NAs。我们分析了PCA在两种被忽视的情况下的性能:包含(1)抑制和(2)延迟的神经相互作用模式的集合。分析考虑了两种人工生成的数据,一种来自传统的泊松模型,另一种来自潜在的多元高斯模型;在这两个模型中,来自行为Wistar大鼠的数据被用于参数调整。我们的研究结果强调了在使用PCA检测NAs时忽略神经元之间复杂的相互作用可能导致错误结论的情况。此外,我们强调了在评估神经元信号处理算法时更现实的模拟的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Limitations of principal component analysis as a method to detect neuronal assemblies
The anatomical and functional characterization of neuronal assemblies (NAs) is a major challenge in neuroscience. Principal component analysis (PCA) is a widely used method for feature detection, however, when dealing with neuronal data analysis, its limitations have not yet been fully understood. Our work complements previous PCA studies which, in general, characterise NAs based solely on excitatory neuronal interactions. We analysed the performance of PCA in two neglected scenarios: assemblies containing patterns of neural interactions (1) with inhibition and (2) with delays. The analyses considered two types of artificially generated data, one drawn from a traditional Poissonian model, and the other drawn from a latent multivariate Gaussian model; in both models, data from a behaving Wistar rat was used for parameter tuning. Our results highlight scenarios in which neglecting complex interactions between neurons can lead to false conclusions when using PCA to detect NAs. Also, we reinforce the importance of more realistic simulations in the evaluation of neuronal signal processing algorithms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信