布比卡因鞘内Vs.布比卡因和可乐定在儿科年龄组:比较评价。

Nagesh Jambure
{"title":"布比卡因鞘内Vs.布比卡因和可乐定在儿科年龄组:比较评价。","authors":"Nagesh Jambure","doi":"10.5580/2cc9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study was done to compare the efficacy, duration, quality and side effects of intrathecal bupivacaine alone and bupivacaine plus clonidine. A prospective randomised double blind study was carried out in 60 ASA-1 paediatrics patients undergoing surgeries below T8 dermatome up to 2 hrs duration. Patients were randomly allocated in two groups. Group-A received bupivacaine .5% heavy (0.4mg/kg for 5-15kg or 0.3mg/kg for >15 kg) and Group-B received bupivacaine 0.5%heavy (0.4mg/kg for 5-15kg or 0.3mg/kg for >15kg) and preservative free clonidine (1 mcg/kg), comprising 30 patients each. Time of onset of sensory block, maximum level of sensory block, duration of sensory block, duration of post-op analgesia and side effects were observed. Data obtained was subjected to statistical computation and analysed using computer programme statistical package for social science (SPSS)ver-16.0 and tests performed were unpaired student-t test, nonparametric mann-whitney two samples test and Chi square test. Value of p<0.05 was considered significant and p<0.0000001 highly significant. Awake sedation score with clonidine was better than bupivacaine alone. The side effect profile: only one patient of Group-A had bradycardia and in Group-B two patients had bradycardia and two patients had hypotension. No patients in any group had nausea vomitting, post dural puncture headache, urinary retention or high spinal. Adding clonidine is providing early onset of sensory block, adequate sedation and prolonged postoperative analgesia.","PeriodicalId":396781,"journal":{"name":"The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intrathecal Bupivacaine Vs. Bupivacaine And Clonidine In Paediatrics Age Group: A Comparative Evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Nagesh Jambure\",\"doi\":\"10.5580/2cc9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study was done to compare the efficacy, duration, quality and side effects of intrathecal bupivacaine alone and bupivacaine plus clonidine. A prospective randomised double blind study was carried out in 60 ASA-1 paediatrics patients undergoing surgeries below T8 dermatome up to 2 hrs duration. Patients were randomly allocated in two groups. Group-A received bupivacaine .5% heavy (0.4mg/kg for 5-15kg or 0.3mg/kg for >15 kg) and Group-B received bupivacaine 0.5%heavy (0.4mg/kg for 5-15kg or 0.3mg/kg for >15kg) and preservative free clonidine (1 mcg/kg), comprising 30 patients each. Time of onset of sensory block, maximum level of sensory block, duration of sensory block, duration of post-op analgesia and side effects were observed. Data obtained was subjected to statistical computation and analysed using computer programme statistical package for social science (SPSS)ver-16.0 and tests performed were unpaired student-t test, nonparametric mann-whitney two samples test and Chi square test. Value of p<0.05 was considered significant and p<0.0000001 highly significant. Awake sedation score with clonidine was better than bupivacaine alone. The side effect profile: only one patient of Group-A had bradycardia and in Group-B two patients had bradycardia and two patients had hypotension. No patients in any group had nausea vomitting, post dural puncture headache, urinary retention or high spinal. Adding clonidine is providing early onset of sensory block, adequate sedation and prolonged postoperative analgesia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":396781,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5580/2cc9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5580/2cc9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

比较布比卡因单用和布比卡因加可乐定鞘内注射的疗效、持续时间、质量和副作用。一项前瞻性随机双盲研究在60例ASA-1儿科患者中进行了长达2小时的T8以下皮肤组手术。患者随机分为两组。a组采用0.5%重布比卡因(5-15kg为0.4mg/kg, >为0.3mg/kg), b组采用0.5%重布比卡因(5-15kg为0.4mg/kg, >为0.3mg/kg)和无保存可乐定(1 mcg/kg),每组30例。观察感觉阻滞发生时间、最大阻滞程度、阻滞持续时间、术后镇痛持续时间及不良反应。所得数据采用SPSS ver-16.0软件进行统计计算和分析,采用非配对student-t检验、非参数mann-whitney双样本检验和卡方检验。p<0.05被认为是显著的和p<0.0000001极显著。清醒镇静评分优于单独使用布比卡因。副作用情况:a组仅有1例心动过缓,b组2例心动过缓,2例低血压。两组患者均无恶心呕吐、硬脑膜穿刺后头痛、尿潴留、脊柱高位。添加可乐定可提供早期感觉阻滞,足够的镇静和延长术后镇痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intrathecal Bupivacaine Vs. Bupivacaine And Clonidine In Paediatrics Age Group: A Comparative Evaluation.
The study was done to compare the efficacy, duration, quality and side effects of intrathecal bupivacaine alone and bupivacaine plus clonidine. A prospective randomised double blind study was carried out in 60 ASA-1 paediatrics patients undergoing surgeries below T8 dermatome up to 2 hrs duration. Patients were randomly allocated in two groups. Group-A received bupivacaine .5% heavy (0.4mg/kg for 5-15kg or 0.3mg/kg for >15 kg) and Group-B received bupivacaine 0.5%heavy (0.4mg/kg for 5-15kg or 0.3mg/kg for >15kg) and preservative free clonidine (1 mcg/kg), comprising 30 patients each. Time of onset of sensory block, maximum level of sensory block, duration of sensory block, duration of post-op analgesia and side effects were observed. Data obtained was subjected to statistical computation and analysed using computer programme statistical package for social science (SPSS)ver-16.0 and tests performed were unpaired student-t test, nonparametric mann-whitney two samples test and Chi square test. Value of p<0.05 was considered significant and p<0.0000001 highly significant. Awake sedation score with clonidine was better than bupivacaine alone. The side effect profile: only one patient of Group-A had bradycardia and in Group-B two patients had bradycardia and two patients had hypotension. No patients in any group had nausea vomitting, post dural puncture headache, urinary retention or high spinal. Adding clonidine is providing early onset of sensory block, adequate sedation and prolonged postoperative analgesia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信