雾化肾上腺素治疗儿童急性哮喘的疗效:一项随机双盲试验

Eva EN, Islam, MM, Hoq ME, Podder BK, Amin SE, Kabir MH, Hossain MZ, Islam N, Hasan MR, Siddique NA
{"title":"雾化肾上腺素治疗儿童急性哮喘的疗效:一项随机双盲试验","authors":"Eva EN, Islam, MM, Hoq ME, Podder BK, Amin SE, Kabir MH, Hossain MZ, Islam N, Hasan MR, Siddique NA","doi":"10.47648/jswmc2023v13-02-79","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Countries like Bangladesh have seen an increase in the prevalence of bronchial asthma. The goal of the study was to compare the efficacy of nebulized salbutamol and nebulized epinephrine in treating children with acute asthma.\n\nObjectives: To assess the clinical improvement of acute bronchial asthma in children following nebulization with salbutamol and epinephrine.\n\nMethodology: This random, double-blind clinical trial was conducted in the paediatric department of the Mymensingh Medical College Hospital. Children of either sex with clinical features of acute exacerbation of asthma, an asthma score >5 to 11, an age range from 6 to 12 years, and the ability to measure peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) were enrolled in this study. Outcomes were observed by measuring PEFR, respiratory rate, pulse rate, and SaO2 and also by determining asthma scores at 15, 35, 55, and 90 min after nebulization at a regular interval at 0, 20, 40, and 60 min. Differences from the base line and differences between both groups were observed.\n\nResults: A total of 56 patients with acute asthma were enrolled in this study. Among them, 27 children were in the salbutamol group, and 29 patients were in the epinephrine group. Among baseline characteristics, there was no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) between the two groups. Asthma score and respiratory rate decreased more in the salbutamol group with time after nebulization, but no statistically significant differences existed for the follow-up at 15, 35, and 55 minutes. A statistically significant increase in asthma score and respiratory rate was seen at 90 minutes of treatment in the salbutamol group. On the other hand, percent of predicted PEFR and SpO2 increased with time in both groups, and no statistically significant differences existed except for SpO2 at 35 min of follow-up in the salbutamol group. The epinephrine-treated group had a higher incidence of side effects as compared with the salbutamol group, but there was no statistically significant difference.\n\nConclusion: Based on this study, in the treatment of asthmatic children with a mild to moderate exacerbation, both nebulized epinephrine and nebulized salbutamol were effective when given in addition to oral steroids.","PeriodicalId":407803,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Sylhet Women’s Medical College","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Efficacy of Nebulized Epinephrine in Children with Acute Asthma: A Randomized Double-blind Trial\",\"authors\":\"Eva EN, Islam, MM, Hoq ME, Podder BK, Amin SE, Kabir MH, Hossain MZ, Islam N, Hasan MR, Siddique NA\",\"doi\":\"10.47648/jswmc2023v13-02-79\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Countries like Bangladesh have seen an increase in the prevalence of bronchial asthma. The goal of the study was to compare the efficacy of nebulized salbutamol and nebulized epinephrine in treating children with acute asthma.\\n\\nObjectives: To assess the clinical improvement of acute bronchial asthma in children following nebulization with salbutamol and epinephrine.\\n\\nMethodology: This random, double-blind clinical trial was conducted in the paediatric department of the Mymensingh Medical College Hospital. Children of either sex with clinical features of acute exacerbation of asthma, an asthma score >5 to 11, an age range from 6 to 12 years, and the ability to measure peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) were enrolled in this study. Outcomes were observed by measuring PEFR, respiratory rate, pulse rate, and SaO2 and also by determining asthma scores at 15, 35, 55, and 90 min after nebulization at a regular interval at 0, 20, 40, and 60 min. Differences from the base line and differences between both groups were observed.\\n\\nResults: A total of 56 patients with acute asthma were enrolled in this study. Among them, 27 children were in the salbutamol group, and 29 patients were in the epinephrine group. Among baseline characteristics, there was no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) between the two groups. Asthma score and respiratory rate decreased more in the salbutamol group with time after nebulization, but no statistically significant differences existed for the follow-up at 15, 35, and 55 minutes. A statistically significant increase in asthma score and respiratory rate was seen at 90 minutes of treatment in the salbutamol group. On the other hand, percent of predicted PEFR and SpO2 increased with time in both groups, and no statistically significant differences existed except for SpO2 at 35 min of follow-up in the salbutamol group. The epinephrine-treated group had a higher incidence of side effects as compared with the salbutamol group, but there was no statistically significant difference.\\n\\nConclusion: Based on this study, in the treatment of asthmatic children with a mild to moderate exacerbation, both nebulized epinephrine and nebulized salbutamol were effective when given in addition to oral steroids.\",\"PeriodicalId\":407803,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Sylhet Women’s Medical College\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Sylhet Women’s Medical College\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47648/jswmc2023v13-02-79\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Sylhet Women’s Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47648/jswmc2023v13-02-79","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

像孟加拉国这样的国家,支气管哮喘的患病率有所上升。本研究的目的是比较雾化沙丁胺醇和雾化肾上腺素治疗儿童急性哮喘的疗效。目的:评价沙丁胺醇和肾上腺素雾化治疗儿童急性支气管哮喘的临床疗效。方法:这项随机、双盲临床试验在Mymensingh医学院附属医院儿科进行。具有哮喘急性加重临床特征、哮喘评分bb50 ~ 11、年龄6 ~ 12岁、能够测量呼气流量峰值(PEFR)的男女儿童均被纳入本研究。通过测量PEFR、呼吸频率、脉搏率和SaO2,以及在雾化后15、35、55和90分钟(间隔时间为0、20、40和60分钟)测定哮喘评分来观察结果。观察与基线的差异以及两组之间的差异。结果:共纳入56例急性哮喘患者。其中沙丁胺醇组27例,肾上腺素组29例。两组患者基线特征比较,差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。沙丁胺醇组哮喘评分和呼吸频率随雾化时间的延长而下降,但随访15、35、55分钟时差异无统计学意义。在治疗90分钟时,沙丁胺醇组哮喘评分和呼吸频率有统计学意义的增加。另一方面,两组预测PEFR和SpO2的百分比随时间增加,除沙丁胺醇组随访35 min时SpO2外,无统计学差异。肾上腺素治疗组的副作用发生率高于沙丁胺醇治疗组,但差异无统计学意义。结论:在本研究的基础上,肾上腺素雾化和沙丁胺醇雾化在口服类固醇的基础上治疗轻中度加重的哮喘患儿均有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Efficacy of Nebulized Epinephrine in Children with Acute Asthma: A Randomized Double-blind Trial
Introduction: Countries like Bangladesh have seen an increase in the prevalence of bronchial asthma. The goal of the study was to compare the efficacy of nebulized salbutamol and nebulized epinephrine in treating children with acute asthma. Objectives: To assess the clinical improvement of acute bronchial asthma in children following nebulization with salbutamol and epinephrine. Methodology: This random, double-blind clinical trial was conducted in the paediatric department of the Mymensingh Medical College Hospital. Children of either sex with clinical features of acute exacerbation of asthma, an asthma score >5 to 11, an age range from 6 to 12 years, and the ability to measure peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) were enrolled in this study. Outcomes were observed by measuring PEFR, respiratory rate, pulse rate, and SaO2 and also by determining asthma scores at 15, 35, 55, and 90 min after nebulization at a regular interval at 0, 20, 40, and 60 min. Differences from the base line and differences between both groups were observed. Results: A total of 56 patients with acute asthma were enrolled in this study. Among them, 27 children were in the salbutamol group, and 29 patients were in the epinephrine group. Among baseline characteristics, there was no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) between the two groups. Asthma score and respiratory rate decreased more in the salbutamol group with time after nebulization, but no statistically significant differences existed for the follow-up at 15, 35, and 55 minutes. A statistically significant increase in asthma score and respiratory rate was seen at 90 minutes of treatment in the salbutamol group. On the other hand, percent of predicted PEFR and SpO2 increased with time in both groups, and no statistically significant differences existed except for SpO2 at 35 min of follow-up in the salbutamol group. The epinephrine-treated group had a higher incidence of side effects as compared with the salbutamol group, but there was no statistically significant difference. Conclusion: Based on this study, in the treatment of asthmatic children with a mild to moderate exacerbation, both nebulized epinephrine and nebulized salbutamol were effective when given in addition to oral steroids.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信