如何在互联网服务提供商和内容提供商之间实现公平对等?

A. Nikkhah, S. Jordan
{"title":"如何在互联网服务提供商和内容提供商之间实现公平对等?","authors":"A. Nikkhah, S. Jordan","doi":"10.1109/ICCCN58024.2023.10230173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Disagreements between Internet Service Providers (ISPs) and content providers over peering fees have risen to the level of potential government regulation. ISPs assert that content providers should pay peering fees based on the volume of downstream traffic. Content providers assert that consumers pay ISPs to transmit the content they request, and thus peering agreements should be settlement-free. We determine the fair peering fee between an ISP and a transit provider or content provider. We first consider cost sharing between an ISP and a transit provider. We derive the peering fee that equalizes their net backbone transportation costs. We illustrate how the peering fee depends on the traffic ratio and the amount of localization of that content. We then derive the peering fee between an ISP and a content provider that results in the same net cost to the ISP, and illustrate how the peering fee depends on the number of interconnection points and the amount of localization. We use these results to dispense with the ISP argument that they should be paid regardless of the amount of localization of content.","PeriodicalId":132030,"journal":{"name":"2023 32nd International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN)","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Can Equitable Peering be Achieved Between ISPs and Content Providers?\",\"authors\":\"A. Nikkhah, S. Jordan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCCN58024.2023.10230173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Disagreements between Internet Service Providers (ISPs) and content providers over peering fees have risen to the level of potential government regulation. ISPs assert that content providers should pay peering fees based on the volume of downstream traffic. Content providers assert that consumers pay ISPs to transmit the content they request, and thus peering agreements should be settlement-free. We determine the fair peering fee between an ISP and a transit provider or content provider. We first consider cost sharing between an ISP and a transit provider. We derive the peering fee that equalizes their net backbone transportation costs. We illustrate how the peering fee depends on the traffic ratio and the amount of localization of that content. We then derive the peering fee between an ISP and a content provider that results in the same net cost to the ISP, and illustrate how the peering fee depends on the number of interconnection points and the amount of localization. We use these results to dispense with the ISP argument that they should be paid regardless of the amount of localization of content.\",\"PeriodicalId\":132030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 32nd International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN)\",\"volume\":\"108 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 32nd International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCN58024.2023.10230173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 32nd International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCN58024.2023.10230173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

互联网服务提供商(isp)和内容提供商之间关于对等收费的分歧已经上升到潜在的政府监管水平。互联网服务提供商主张,内容提供商应该根据下游流量的大小支付对等费用。内容提供商声称,消费者向互联网服务提供商付费以传输他们请求的内容,因此对等协议应该是免结算的。我们确定ISP和传输提供商或内容提供商之间的公平对等费用。我们首先考虑ISP和传输提供商之间的成本分担。我们得到对等费用,使它们的净骨干运输成本相等。我们将说明对等费用如何取决于流量比率和内容的本地化量。然后,我们推导出ISP和内容提供商之间的对等费用,导致ISP的净成本相同,并说明对等费用如何取决于互连点的数量和本地化的数量。我们使用这些结果来免除ISP的论点,即无论内容的本地化程度如何,他们都应该获得报酬。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Can Equitable Peering be Achieved Between ISPs and Content Providers?
Disagreements between Internet Service Providers (ISPs) and content providers over peering fees have risen to the level of potential government regulation. ISPs assert that content providers should pay peering fees based on the volume of downstream traffic. Content providers assert that consumers pay ISPs to transmit the content they request, and thus peering agreements should be settlement-free. We determine the fair peering fee between an ISP and a transit provider or content provider. We first consider cost sharing between an ISP and a transit provider. We derive the peering fee that equalizes their net backbone transportation costs. We illustrate how the peering fee depends on the traffic ratio and the amount of localization of that content. We then derive the peering fee between an ISP and a content provider that results in the same net cost to the ISP, and illustrate how the peering fee depends on the number of interconnection points and the amount of localization. We use these results to dispense with the ISP argument that they should be paid regardless of the amount of localization of content.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信