非常规评估——问题与经验[教育]

J. A. Piotrowski
{"title":"非常规评估——问题与经验[教育]","authors":"J. A. Piotrowski","doi":"10.1109/FIE.1994.583199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Education relies on monitoring of a student's progress and a current assessment is often used as a stimulus to encourage systematic study It is particularly helpful for students of a lower division undergraduate level. In an effort to diversify the program in a large group of computer science students, a slightly differing approach has been attempted in its subgroups. This paper presents an experiment: in which a concept of prerequisites and verified minimal requirements have been tried within one subject. Some 300 students did a standard set of theoretical and practical exercises, but some students were given one or two additional projects allocated depending on their level of competence. These projects once given, were compulsory; but they could yield only a small number of points. A presumption that to do a job a person must be suitable for it, although seemingly unquestionable, is sometimes difficult to accept. It is surprising however, that while criticism coming from students was rather natural, a negative perception was also evident among faculty. This suggests, that although the method raises no objections in principle, it must be modified.","PeriodicalId":288591,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 1994 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference - FIE '94","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nonconventional assessment-problems and experiences [education]\",\"authors\":\"J. A. Piotrowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FIE.1994.583199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Education relies on monitoring of a student's progress and a current assessment is often used as a stimulus to encourage systematic study It is particularly helpful for students of a lower division undergraduate level. In an effort to diversify the program in a large group of computer science students, a slightly differing approach has been attempted in its subgroups. This paper presents an experiment: in which a concept of prerequisites and verified minimal requirements have been tried within one subject. Some 300 students did a standard set of theoretical and practical exercises, but some students were given one or two additional projects allocated depending on their level of competence. These projects once given, were compulsory; but they could yield only a small number of points. A presumption that to do a job a person must be suitable for it, although seemingly unquestionable, is sometimes difficult to accept. It is surprising however, that while criticism coming from students was rather natural, a negative perception was also evident among faculty. This suggests, that although the method raises no objections in principle, it must be modified.\",\"PeriodicalId\":288591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of 1994 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference - FIE '94\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of 1994 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference - FIE '94\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.1994.583199\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 1994 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference - FIE '94","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.1994.583199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

教育依赖于对学生进步的监控,当前的评估经常被用作鼓励系统学习的刺激因素,这对低年级的本科生特别有帮助。为了使该课程在计算机科学专业的大学生群体中多样化,在其子群体中尝试了一种略有不同的方法。本文提出了一个实验:在一个科目中尝试了先决条件和已验证的最低要求的概念。大约300名学生做了一套标准的理论和实践练习,但有些学生根据他们的能力水平分配了一两个额外的项目。这些项目一旦下达,就是强制性的;但他们只能得到很少的分数。要从事一项工作,一个人必须适合这项工作,这一假设虽然看似毋庸置疑,但有时却难以接受。然而,令人惊讶的是,虽然来自学生的批评相当自然,但教师的负面看法也很明显。这表明,虽然该方法在原则上没有异议,但必须加以修改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nonconventional assessment-problems and experiences [education]
Education relies on monitoring of a student's progress and a current assessment is often used as a stimulus to encourage systematic study It is particularly helpful for students of a lower division undergraduate level. In an effort to diversify the program in a large group of computer science students, a slightly differing approach has been attempted in its subgroups. This paper presents an experiment: in which a concept of prerequisites and verified minimal requirements have been tried within one subject. Some 300 students did a standard set of theoretical and practical exercises, but some students were given one or two additional projects allocated depending on their level of competence. These projects once given, were compulsory; but they could yield only a small number of points. A presumption that to do a job a person must be suitable for it, although seemingly unquestionable, is sometimes difficult to accept. It is surprising however, that while criticism coming from students was rather natural, a negative perception was also evident among faculty. This suggests, that although the method raises no objections in principle, it must be modified.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信