烧了还是让他们埋了?利用进口废物生产区域供热系统的净社会成本

Thomas Broberg, E. Dijkgraaf, Sef Meens-Eriksson, Cere Center for Environmental and Resource Economics
{"title":"烧了还是让他们埋了?利用进口废物生产区域供热系统的净社会成本","authors":"Thomas Broberg, E. Dijkgraaf, Sef Meens-Eriksson, Cere Center for Environmental and Resource Economics","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3942535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, a cost-benefit analysis (CBA) framework is applied to provide insights on policy issues relating to the cross-border trade in waste fuel. We estimate the net social cost of using imported waste fuel in a highly efficient combined heat and power plant (CHP) in a cold climate by considering both private costs and benefits as well as external costs related to energy production, alternative waste management and fuel transport. We conclude that using imported waste fuel under such circumstances is beneficial from a societal perspective given the wide range of assumptions regarding technical, economic and environmental characteristics. The net social cost is mainly determined by fuel cost advantages and the external cost of greenhouse gas emissions. External costs associated with transports only marginally impact the net social cost of waste imports for incineration. The results are robust to variation in the excess heat utilisation rate, which implies that importing waste for incineration would also be beneficial in countries with milder climates where district heating networks already exist.","PeriodicalId":388441,"journal":{"name":"Political Economy - Development: Environment eJournal","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Burn it or let them bury it? The net social cost of producing district heating from imported waste\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Broberg, E. Dijkgraaf, Sef Meens-Eriksson, Cere Center for Environmental and Resource Economics\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3942535\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, a cost-benefit analysis (CBA) framework is applied to provide insights on policy issues relating to the cross-border trade in waste fuel. We estimate the net social cost of using imported waste fuel in a highly efficient combined heat and power plant (CHP) in a cold climate by considering both private costs and benefits as well as external costs related to energy production, alternative waste management and fuel transport. We conclude that using imported waste fuel under such circumstances is beneficial from a societal perspective given the wide range of assumptions regarding technical, economic and environmental characteristics. The net social cost is mainly determined by fuel cost advantages and the external cost of greenhouse gas emissions. External costs associated with transports only marginally impact the net social cost of waste imports for incineration. The results are robust to variation in the excess heat utilisation rate, which implies that importing waste for incineration would also be beneficial in countries with milder climates where district heating networks already exist.\",\"PeriodicalId\":388441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Political Economy - Development: Environment eJournal\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Political Economy - Development: Environment eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3942535\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Economy - Development: Environment eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3942535","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本研究中,成本效益分析(CBA)框架应用于提供有关废旧燃料跨境贸易的政策问题的见解。我们通过考虑私人成本和收益以及与能源生产、替代废物管理和燃料运输相关的外部成本,估算了在寒冷气候下在高效热电联产(CHP)中使用进口废燃料的净社会成本。我们的结论是,鉴于有关技术、经济和环境特征的广泛假设,从社会角度来看,在这种情况下使用进口废燃料是有益的。净社会成本主要由燃料成本优势和温室气体排放的外部成本决定。与运输有关的外部成本对进口废物焚烧的净社会成本影响甚微。结果对余热利用率的变化是稳健的,这意味着在已经存在区域供热网络的气候较温和的国家,进口废物进行焚烧也将是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Burn it or let them bury it? The net social cost of producing district heating from imported waste
In this study, a cost-benefit analysis (CBA) framework is applied to provide insights on policy issues relating to the cross-border trade in waste fuel. We estimate the net social cost of using imported waste fuel in a highly efficient combined heat and power plant (CHP) in a cold climate by considering both private costs and benefits as well as external costs related to energy production, alternative waste management and fuel transport. We conclude that using imported waste fuel under such circumstances is beneficial from a societal perspective given the wide range of assumptions regarding technical, economic and environmental characteristics. The net social cost is mainly determined by fuel cost advantages and the external cost of greenhouse gas emissions. External costs associated with transports only marginally impact the net social cost of waste imports for incineration. The results are robust to variation in the excess heat utilisation rate, which implies that importing waste for incineration would also be beneficial in countries with milder climates where district heating networks already exist.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信