机器人的说服力取决于用户性别

Isabella Ågren, Sofia Thunberg
{"title":"机器人的说服力取决于用户性别","authors":"Isabella Ågren, Sofia Thunberg","doi":"10.1145/3527188.3563939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Robot’s persuasive abilities have previously shown contradictory results with some depending on robot gender and some on user gender. Therefore, we conducted a replication study with the Furhat robot. The study measured differences in how persuasive (ethos, pathos, and logos) a more feminine and a more masculine looking robot was perceived by female or male participants. We hypothesised that a platform with both feminine/masculine faces and voices enables larger differences between the robot’s persuasiveness compared to a female/male NAO robot (original study). Results showed statistically significant differences regarding persuasiveness between participant gender but none for the robot gender. One difference, compared to the original study, was that men rated ethos higher than women did.","PeriodicalId":179256,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robot Persuasiveness Depending on User Gender\",\"authors\":\"Isabella Ågren, Sofia Thunberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3527188.3563939\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Robot’s persuasive abilities have previously shown contradictory results with some depending on robot gender and some on user gender. Therefore, we conducted a replication study with the Furhat robot. The study measured differences in how persuasive (ethos, pathos, and logos) a more feminine and a more masculine looking robot was perceived by female or male participants. We hypothesised that a platform with both feminine/masculine faces and voices enables larger differences between the robot’s persuasiveness compared to a female/male NAO robot (original study). Results showed statistically significant differences regarding persuasiveness between participant gender but none for the robot gender. One difference, compared to the original study, was that men rated ethos higher than women did.\",\"PeriodicalId\":179256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3527188.3563939\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3527188.3563939","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

机器人的说服能力之前显示出矛盾的结果,一些取决于机器人的性别,一些取决于用户的性别。因此,我们对Furhat机器人进行了重复研究。这项研究衡量了女性和男性参与者对一个更女性化的机器人和一个更男性化的机器人的说服力(气质、感召和标志)的不同看法。我们假设,一个同时拥有女性/男性面孔和声音的平台,与女性/男性NAO机器人相比,机器人的说服力差异更大(原始研究)。结果显示,在说服力方面,参与者性别之间存在统计学上的显著差异,但机器人性别之间没有差异。与最初的研究相比,一个不同之处在于,男性对气质的评价高于女性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Robot Persuasiveness Depending on User Gender
Robot’s persuasive abilities have previously shown contradictory results with some depending on robot gender and some on user gender. Therefore, we conducted a replication study with the Furhat robot. The study measured differences in how persuasive (ethos, pathos, and logos) a more feminine and a more masculine looking robot was perceived by female or male participants. We hypothesised that a platform with both feminine/masculine faces and voices enables larger differences between the robot’s persuasiveness compared to a female/male NAO robot (original study). Results showed statistically significant differences regarding persuasiveness between participant gender but none for the robot gender. One difference, compared to the original study, was that men rated ethos higher than women did.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信