罗哌卡因用于第三磨牙拔除的麻醉效果评价——一项随机对照研究

{"title":"罗哌卡因用于第三磨牙拔除的麻醉效果评价——一项随机对照研究","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/jodh.07.03.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study involved 20 healthy patients (ASA 1) with bilaterally impacted mandibular third molar were randomly selected of both Sexes between age group of 20-40 years. Purpose: This study was done to evaluate the efficacy of Ropivacaine in comparison with Lignocaine for mandibular anaesthesia for bilaterally impacted mandibular third molars in aspect of onset, duration of anaesthesia, analgesia and postoperative requirement of analgesics. Method: Patients received 2ml of 2% Lignocaine with adrenaline on one side and 2ml of 0.75 % plain ropivacaine on the other side at two different appointments. Pain experiences were measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Verbal Rating Scale (VRS). Results: In ropivacaine group, the means of onset of anesthesia, duration of anaesthesia, duration of post-operative analgesia and requirement of post-operative analgesics were 5.8±2.33 min, 533.3±142.2 min, 539.6±114.7 min and 4.2±0.8 no’s respectively and there was a significant difference between these group (<0.001). Conclusion: The efficacy of plain ropivacaine 0.75% is superior to 2% lignocaine with adrenaline 1:1,00,000 in terms of duration of anaesthesia and analgesia, intraoperative and post-operative pain control but the onset of action of plain ropivacaine is slightly higher. We conclude that Plain Ropivacaine 0.75% can be used as an alternative to lignocaine in third molar surgeries and other minor surgical procedures which necessitates longer duration of anaesthesia and analgesia in oral and maxillofacial region.","PeriodicalId":437084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral &amp; Dental Health","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Anaesthetic Efficacy of Ropivacaine for the Removal of Impacted 3rd Molars- A Randomised Control Study\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.33140/jodh.07.03.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study involved 20 healthy patients (ASA 1) with bilaterally impacted mandibular third molar were randomly selected of both Sexes between age group of 20-40 years. Purpose: This study was done to evaluate the efficacy of Ropivacaine in comparison with Lignocaine for mandibular anaesthesia for bilaterally impacted mandibular third molars in aspect of onset, duration of anaesthesia, analgesia and postoperative requirement of analgesics. Method: Patients received 2ml of 2% Lignocaine with adrenaline on one side and 2ml of 0.75 % plain ropivacaine on the other side at two different appointments. Pain experiences were measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Verbal Rating Scale (VRS). Results: In ropivacaine group, the means of onset of anesthesia, duration of anaesthesia, duration of post-operative analgesia and requirement of post-operative analgesics were 5.8±2.33 min, 533.3±142.2 min, 539.6±114.7 min and 4.2±0.8 no’s respectively and there was a significant difference between these group (<0.001). Conclusion: The efficacy of plain ropivacaine 0.75% is superior to 2% lignocaine with adrenaline 1:1,00,000 in terms of duration of anaesthesia and analgesia, intraoperative and post-operative pain control but the onset of action of plain ropivacaine is slightly higher. We conclude that Plain Ropivacaine 0.75% can be used as an alternative to lignocaine in third molar surgeries and other minor surgical procedures which necessitates longer duration of anaesthesia and analgesia in oral and maxillofacial region.\",\"PeriodicalId\":437084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Oral &amp; Dental Health\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Oral &amp; Dental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33140/jodh.07.03.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral &amp; Dental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/jodh.07.03.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究随机选取20例健康双侧下颌第三磨牙阻生患者(ASA 1),年龄20-40岁,男女不限。目的:比较罗哌卡因与利多卡因对双侧阻生下颌第三磨牙下颌麻醉的起效、麻醉持续时间、镇痛效果及术后对镇痛药的需求。方法:患者在两次不同的预约中,一边注射2%利多卡因2ml,一边注射肾上腺素,另一边注射0.75%普通罗哌卡因2ml。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和言语评定量表(VRS)测量疼痛体验。结果:罗哌卡因组麻醉起麻时间、麻醉持续时间、术后镇痛持续时间、术后镇痛药物需用时间分别为5.8±2.33 min、533.3±142.2 min、539.6±114.7 min、4.2±0.8 min,组间差异有统计学意义(<0.001)。结论:0.75%的普通罗哌卡因在麻醉镇痛持续时间、术中及术后疼痛控制方面优于2%的利多卡因,肾上腺素为1:1,000,但普通罗哌卡因的起效略高。结论:0.75%罗哌卡因可替代利多卡因用于第三磨牙手术和其他需要较长时间口腔颌面区域麻醉和镇痛的小手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Anaesthetic Efficacy of Ropivacaine for the Removal of Impacted 3rd Molars- A Randomised Control Study
This study involved 20 healthy patients (ASA 1) with bilaterally impacted mandibular third molar were randomly selected of both Sexes between age group of 20-40 years. Purpose: This study was done to evaluate the efficacy of Ropivacaine in comparison with Lignocaine for mandibular anaesthesia for bilaterally impacted mandibular third molars in aspect of onset, duration of anaesthesia, analgesia and postoperative requirement of analgesics. Method: Patients received 2ml of 2% Lignocaine with adrenaline on one side and 2ml of 0.75 % plain ropivacaine on the other side at two different appointments. Pain experiences were measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Verbal Rating Scale (VRS). Results: In ropivacaine group, the means of onset of anesthesia, duration of anaesthesia, duration of post-operative analgesia and requirement of post-operative analgesics were 5.8±2.33 min, 533.3±142.2 min, 539.6±114.7 min and 4.2±0.8 no’s respectively and there was a significant difference between these group (<0.001). Conclusion: The efficacy of plain ropivacaine 0.75% is superior to 2% lignocaine with adrenaline 1:1,00,000 in terms of duration of anaesthesia and analgesia, intraoperative and post-operative pain control but the onset of action of plain ropivacaine is slightly higher. We conclude that Plain Ropivacaine 0.75% can be used as an alternative to lignocaine in third molar surgeries and other minor surgical procedures which necessitates longer duration of anaesthesia and analgesia in oral and maxillofacial region.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信