浴:

David A. Norris
{"title":"浴:","authors":"David A. Norris","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv1c3pdt5.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Policy emphasis has recently shifted to ‘Finance for All’ given evidence that financial sector development (FSD) contributes to growth but that the primary effects on poverty do not arise from pro-poor provision. This paper uses data from Financial Access Surveys carried out in 2006 in Kenya and Uganda to investigate the socio-economic, demographic and geographical factors causing access to and exclusion from formal, semi-formal and informal financial services. It approaches this from the perspective of institutional analysis. It finds, first, that social institutions do present underlying barriers to access - more so than geography - and that informal provision is extensive. These findings suggest that institutional theories of FSD need to address the role of underlying social institutions and better understand the role of informal finance, and that policy for effective outreach must similarly consider these dimensions.","PeriodicalId":368216,"journal":{"name":"England in the Age of Austen","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BATH:\",\"authors\":\"David A. Norris\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctv1c3pdt5.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Policy emphasis has recently shifted to ‘Finance for All’ given evidence that financial sector development (FSD) contributes to growth but that the primary effects on poverty do not arise from pro-poor provision. This paper uses data from Financial Access Surveys carried out in 2006 in Kenya and Uganda to investigate the socio-economic, demographic and geographical factors causing access to and exclusion from formal, semi-formal and informal financial services. It approaches this from the perspective of institutional analysis. It finds, first, that social institutions do present underlying barriers to access - more so than geography - and that informal provision is extensive. These findings suggest that institutional theories of FSD need to address the role of underlying social institutions and better understand the role of informal finance, and that policy for effective outreach must similarly consider these dimensions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":368216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"England in the Age of Austen\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"England in the Age of Austen\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1c3pdt5.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"England in the Age of Austen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1c3pdt5.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鉴于有证据表明,金融部门发展有助于经济增长,但对贫困的主要影响并非来自扶贫提供,政策重点最近已转向“人人享有金融”。本文使用了2006年在肯尼亚和乌干达开展的金融准入调查的数据,调查了导致获得正规、半正规和非正规金融服务和被排斥的社会经济、人口和地理因素。本文从制度分析的角度来探讨这一问题。它发现,首先,社会制度确实对获取存在潜在的障碍——比地理上的障碍更严重——而且非正式的提供是广泛的。这些发现表明,FSD的制度理论需要解决潜在社会制度的作用,并更好地理解非正式金融的作用,有效推广的政策也必须同样考虑这些方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
BATH:
Policy emphasis has recently shifted to ‘Finance for All’ given evidence that financial sector development (FSD) contributes to growth but that the primary effects on poverty do not arise from pro-poor provision. This paper uses data from Financial Access Surveys carried out in 2006 in Kenya and Uganda to investigate the socio-economic, demographic and geographical factors causing access to and exclusion from formal, semi-formal and informal financial services. It approaches this from the perspective of institutional analysis. It finds, first, that social institutions do present underlying barriers to access - more so than geography - and that informal provision is extensive. These findings suggest that institutional theories of FSD need to address the role of underlying social institutions and better understand the role of informal finance, and that policy for effective outreach must similarly consider these dimensions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信