三维笔迹取证中自适应局部阈值分割的研究

Michael Kalbitz, T. Scheidat, C. Vielhauer
{"title":"三维笔迹取证中自适应局部阈值分割的研究","authors":"Michael Kalbitz, T. Scheidat, C. Vielhauer","doi":"10.1109/IPTA.2016.7821000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Image segmentation plays an important role in digitized crime scene forensics. Particularly in context of modern high resolution contact-less and non-destructive acquisition and analysis of handwriting impression traces by means of 3D sensors, one main challenge is the separation of writing trace areas and non-traces by image segmentation. In earlier work authors have presented the general, yet qualitative feasibility to do so by an initial processing pipeline based on data acquisition, pre-processing and a global segmentation approach. However, quantitative measurements with regards to the segmentation quality have not been studied yet, as well as the discussion of alternative strategies for 3D image segmentation in this scenario. In this paper, we extent the earlier work by introducing a concept for benchmarking segmentation accuracy for 3D handwriting traces. Further we present results with regards to the initial approach as well as a new, adaptive local threshold segmentation. The benchmarking is based on ground truth data, determined using data of handwriting traces acquired by a high-quality flatbed scanner and segmentation information retrieved from those by means of an Otsu operator. This ground truth allows for calculation of true positive, true negative, false positive and false negative error rates as quality measurement. The practical impact of the suggested benchmarking is shown by comparison of experimental results based on initial segmentation approach and new adaptive approach. Experiments are based on ten handwriting traces each of eleven persons. The comparison of results indicates that the best parameter set of the adaptive thresholding leads to an quality increase of 12.1% in terms of precision for writing trace and decrease of 1.4% in terms of precission for background.","PeriodicalId":123429,"journal":{"name":"2016 Sixth International Conference on Image Processing Theory, Tools and Applications (IPTA)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of adaptive local threshold segmentation in context of 3D-handwriting forensics\",\"authors\":\"Michael Kalbitz, T. Scheidat, C. Vielhauer\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IPTA.2016.7821000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Image segmentation plays an important role in digitized crime scene forensics. Particularly in context of modern high resolution contact-less and non-destructive acquisition and analysis of handwriting impression traces by means of 3D sensors, one main challenge is the separation of writing trace areas and non-traces by image segmentation. In earlier work authors have presented the general, yet qualitative feasibility to do so by an initial processing pipeline based on data acquisition, pre-processing and a global segmentation approach. However, quantitative measurements with regards to the segmentation quality have not been studied yet, as well as the discussion of alternative strategies for 3D image segmentation in this scenario. In this paper, we extent the earlier work by introducing a concept for benchmarking segmentation accuracy for 3D handwriting traces. Further we present results with regards to the initial approach as well as a new, adaptive local threshold segmentation. The benchmarking is based on ground truth data, determined using data of handwriting traces acquired by a high-quality flatbed scanner and segmentation information retrieved from those by means of an Otsu operator. This ground truth allows for calculation of true positive, true negative, false positive and false negative error rates as quality measurement. The practical impact of the suggested benchmarking is shown by comparison of experimental results based on initial segmentation approach and new adaptive approach. Experiments are based on ten handwriting traces each of eleven persons. The comparison of results indicates that the best parameter set of the adaptive thresholding leads to an quality increase of 12.1% in terms of precision for writing trace and decrease of 1.4% in terms of precission for background.\",\"PeriodicalId\":123429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 Sixth International Conference on Image Processing Theory, Tools and Applications (IPTA)\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 Sixth International Conference on Image Processing Theory, Tools and Applications (IPTA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPTA.2016.7821000\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Sixth International Conference on Image Processing Theory, Tools and Applications (IPTA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPTA.2016.7821000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

图像分割在数字化犯罪现场取证中起着重要的作用。特别是在现代高分辨率的背景下,非接触式和非破坏性的采集和分析手写印痕痕迹的三维传感器,一个主要的挑战是通过图像分割书写痕迹区域和非痕迹的分离。在早期的工作中,作者通过基于数据采集,预处理和全局分割方法的初始处理管道提出了一般的定性可行性。然而,关于分割质量的定量测量还没有研究,也没有讨论在这种情况下3D图像分割的替代策略。在本文中,我们通过引入对3D手写痕迹的分割精度进行基准测试的概念来扩展早期的工作。此外,我们提出了关于初始方法的结果以及一种新的自适应局部阈值分割。基准测试基于地面真实数据,使用高质量平板扫描仪获取的手写痕迹数据和通过Otsu算子检索的分割信息来确定。这个基础真理允许计算真阳性、真阴性、假阳性和假阴性错误率作为质量测量。通过对基于初始分割方法和新自适应方法的实验结果进行比较,证明了所建议的基准测试的实际效果。实验基于11个人的10个笔迹痕迹。结果表明,自适应阈值的最佳参数集使书写轨迹精度提高了12.1%,背景精度降低了1.4%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigation of adaptive local threshold segmentation in context of 3D-handwriting forensics
Image segmentation plays an important role in digitized crime scene forensics. Particularly in context of modern high resolution contact-less and non-destructive acquisition and analysis of handwriting impression traces by means of 3D sensors, one main challenge is the separation of writing trace areas and non-traces by image segmentation. In earlier work authors have presented the general, yet qualitative feasibility to do so by an initial processing pipeline based on data acquisition, pre-processing and a global segmentation approach. However, quantitative measurements with regards to the segmentation quality have not been studied yet, as well as the discussion of alternative strategies for 3D image segmentation in this scenario. In this paper, we extent the earlier work by introducing a concept for benchmarking segmentation accuracy for 3D handwriting traces. Further we present results with regards to the initial approach as well as a new, adaptive local threshold segmentation. The benchmarking is based on ground truth data, determined using data of handwriting traces acquired by a high-quality flatbed scanner and segmentation information retrieved from those by means of an Otsu operator. This ground truth allows for calculation of true positive, true negative, false positive and false negative error rates as quality measurement. The practical impact of the suggested benchmarking is shown by comparison of experimental results based on initial segmentation approach and new adaptive approach. Experiments are based on ten handwriting traces each of eleven persons. The comparison of results indicates that the best parameter set of the adaptive thresholding leads to an quality increase of 12.1% in terms of precision for writing trace and decrease of 1.4% in terms of precission for background.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信