学生身份的悖论:阿姆斯特丹东部弱势社区的社会混合与士绅化

F. K. Boersma, H. Langen, P. Smets
{"title":"学生身份的悖论:阿姆斯特丹东部弱势社区的社会混合与士绅化","authors":"F. K. Boersma, H. Langen, P. Smets","doi":"10.2174/1874942901306010040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studio K, a relatively new quasi-public space in a gentrifying multi-ethnic neighborhood in Amsterdam East, is a prime example of the growing urban reinvestment within the area. The basic idea behind the by students managed Studio K is to create a cultural centre as an open place, including a cinema, restaurant, bar and club, where all visitors feel at home. It is the form and content that renders neighborhood relations relevant, not the physical proximity. Our paper involves a critical discussion of what can be understood as 'community commitment' and how the organizational identity of Studio K responded to the needs and expectations of the community in relation to the gentrification debate, and in particular studentification. Our analysis suggests that neighborhoods do not indicate the potential for social identification and shared community experience.","PeriodicalId":106409,"journal":{"name":"The Open Urban Studies Journal","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paradoxes of studentification: social mix versus gentrification in a disadvantaged neighborhood in Amsterdam East\",\"authors\":\"F. K. Boersma, H. Langen, P. Smets\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874942901306010040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Studio K, a relatively new quasi-public space in a gentrifying multi-ethnic neighborhood in Amsterdam East, is a prime example of the growing urban reinvestment within the area. The basic idea behind the by students managed Studio K is to create a cultural centre as an open place, including a cinema, restaurant, bar and club, where all visitors feel at home. It is the form and content that renders neighborhood relations relevant, not the physical proximity. Our paper involves a critical discussion of what can be understood as 'community commitment' and how the organizational identity of Studio K responded to the needs and expectations of the community in relation to the gentrification debate, and in particular studentification. Our analysis suggests that neighborhoods do not indicate the potential for social identification and shared community experience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Open Urban Studies Journal\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Open Urban Studies Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874942901306010040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Urban Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874942901306010040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

K工作室是一个相对较新的准公共空间,位于阿姆斯特丹东部一个高档化的多民族社区,是该地区不断增长的城市再投资的一个主要例子。由学生管理的工作室K背后的基本想法是创建一个文化中心作为一个开放的地方,包括电影院、餐厅、酒吧和俱乐部,在这里所有的游客都有宾至如归的感觉。使邻里关系相关的是形式和内容,而不是物理上的接近。我们的论文涉及了一个批判性的讨论,即什么可以被理解为“社区承诺”,以及Studio K的组织身份如何回应与中产阶级化辩论有关的社区需求和期望,特别是学生资格。我们的分析表明,邻里关系并不表明社会认同和共享社区经验的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Paradoxes of studentification: social mix versus gentrification in a disadvantaged neighborhood in Amsterdam East
Studio K, a relatively new quasi-public space in a gentrifying multi-ethnic neighborhood in Amsterdam East, is a prime example of the growing urban reinvestment within the area. The basic idea behind the by students managed Studio K is to create a cultural centre as an open place, including a cinema, restaurant, bar and club, where all visitors feel at home. It is the form and content that renders neighborhood relations relevant, not the physical proximity. Our paper involves a critical discussion of what can be understood as 'community commitment' and how the organizational identity of Studio K responded to the needs and expectations of the community in relation to the gentrification debate, and in particular studentification. Our analysis suggests that neighborhoods do not indicate the potential for social identification and shared community experience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信