利用德语动词第二句右外围的话语话题与句子话题

V. Molnár, Hélène Vinckel-Roisin
{"title":"利用德语动词第二句右外围的话语话题与句子话题","authors":"V. Molnár, Hélène Vinckel-Roisin","doi":"10.1515/9781501504488-011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Exploring the interface between discourse structure and syntax, the present study addresses the relationship between discourse topicality and marked word order in German V2-sentences. It takes as its point of departure two manifestations of a highly marked syntactic structure at the right periphery of the German sentence: the ‘extraposition’ (also called ‘unbracketing’ , Ausklammerung in German grammars) and the ‘right-dislocation’ ( Rechtsversetzung ). In both cases, verbless constituents like PPs and NPs appear beyond the right frontier of the sentence (created by a closure-marking final element), in the ‘extended postfield’ ( Nachfeld ). On the basis of a corpus collected from German contemporary newspapers ( Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung and Süddeutsche Zeitung ), we will show that these two right-peripheral syntactic strategies ‘extraposition’ and ‘right-dislocation’ can have the same discourse function, despite different syntactic and prosodic/typographic features. They indicate that the referent of the right-peripheral constituent (NP or PP) is salient and highly relevant for the whole discourse. It functions as the ‘discourse topic referent’, i.e. the discourse referent that is most stably activated in the mental representation of each discourse segment. We claim that both investigated strategies are relevant ‘forward-looking’ devices (often in a combination with ‘backward-looking’ strategies), guaranteeing referential coherence in discourse by imposing certain constraints on the subsequent and / or previous discourse segment(s).","PeriodicalId":397058,"journal":{"name":"Architecture of Topic","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discourse Topic vs. Sentence Topic Exploiting the Right Periphery of German Verb-second Sentences\",\"authors\":\"V. Molnár, Hélène Vinckel-Roisin\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9781501504488-011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Exploring the interface between discourse structure and syntax, the present study addresses the relationship between discourse topicality and marked word order in German V2-sentences. It takes as its point of departure two manifestations of a highly marked syntactic structure at the right periphery of the German sentence: the ‘extraposition’ (also called ‘unbracketing’ , Ausklammerung in German grammars) and the ‘right-dislocation’ ( Rechtsversetzung ). In both cases, verbless constituents like PPs and NPs appear beyond the right frontier of the sentence (created by a closure-marking final element), in the ‘extended postfield’ ( Nachfeld ). On the basis of a corpus collected from German contemporary newspapers ( Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung and Süddeutsche Zeitung ), we will show that these two right-peripheral syntactic strategies ‘extraposition’ and ‘right-dislocation’ can have the same discourse function, despite different syntactic and prosodic/typographic features. They indicate that the referent of the right-peripheral constituent (NP or PP) is salient and highly relevant for the whole discourse. It functions as the ‘discourse topic referent’, i.e. the discourse referent that is most stably activated in the mental representation of each discourse segment. We claim that both investigated strategies are relevant ‘forward-looking’ devices (often in a combination with ‘backward-looking’ strategies), guaranteeing referential coherence in discourse by imposing certain constraints on the subsequent and / or previous discourse segment(s).\",\"PeriodicalId\":397058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Architecture of Topic\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Architecture of Topic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501504488-011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architecture of Topic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501504488-011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究从语篇结构与句法的界面出发,探讨了德语v2句中语篇话题性与标记词序之间的关系。它以德语句子右边缘高度显著的句法结构的两种表现形式为出发点:“外置”(也称为“unbracketing”,德语语法中的Ausklammerung)和“右错位”(Rechtsversetzung)。在这两种情况下,无动词成分,如PPs和NPs出现在句子的右边界之外(由结束标记的最后元素产生),在“扩展后字段”中(Nachfeld)。以德国当代报纸(《法兰克福汇报》和《德意志日报》)的语料库为基础,我们将展示这两种右外围句法策略“外置”和“右错位”可以具有相同的话语功能,尽管它们的句法和韵律/排版特征不同。它们表明,右外围成分(NP或PP)的指称物对整个话语具有显著性和高度相关性。它的功能是“话语话题指涉”,即在每个话语片段的心理表征中最稳定激活的话语指涉。我们认为这两种策略都是相关的“前瞻性”策略(通常与“向后看”策略相结合),通过对后续和/或之前的语段施加一定的约束来保证语篇中的指称一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Discourse Topic vs. Sentence Topic Exploiting the Right Periphery of German Verb-second Sentences
Exploring the interface between discourse structure and syntax, the present study addresses the relationship between discourse topicality and marked word order in German V2-sentences. It takes as its point of departure two manifestations of a highly marked syntactic structure at the right periphery of the German sentence: the ‘extraposition’ (also called ‘unbracketing’ , Ausklammerung in German grammars) and the ‘right-dislocation’ ( Rechtsversetzung ). In both cases, verbless constituents like PPs and NPs appear beyond the right frontier of the sentence (created by a closure-marking final element), in the ‘extended postfield’ ( Nachfeld ). On the basis of a corpus collected from German contemporary newspapers ( Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung and Süddeutsche Zeitung ), we will show that these two right-peripheral syntactic strategies ‘extraposition’ and ‘right-dislocation’ can have the same discourse function, despite different syntactic and prosodic/typographic features. They indicate that the referent of the right-peripheral constituent (NP or PP) is salient and highly relevant for the whole discourse. It functions as the ‘discourse topic referent’, i.e. the discourse referent that is most stably activated in the mental representation of each discourse segment. We claim that both investigated strategies are relevant ‘forward-looking’ devices (often in a combination with ‘backward-looking’ strategies), guaranteeing referential coherence in discourse by imposing certain constraints on the subsequent and / or previous discourse segment(s).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信