基于交叉熵的衍生证券定价经济学分析

Nicole Branger
{"title":"基于交叉熵的衍生证券定价经济学分析","authors":"Nicole Branger","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.400060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyses two implied methods to determine the pricing function for derivatives when the market is incomplete. First, we consider the choice of an equivalent martingale measure with minimal cross-entropy relative to a given benchmark measure. We show that the choice of the numeraire has an impact on the resulting pricing function, but that there is no sound economic answer to the question which numeraire to choose. The ad-hoc choice of the numeraire introduces an element of arbitrariness into the pricing function, thus contradicting the motivation of this method as the least prejudiced way to choose the pricing operator. Second, we propose two new methods to select a pricing function: the choice of the stochastic discount factor (SDF) with minimalextendedcross-entropy relative to a given benchmark SDF, and the choice of the Arrow–Debreu (AD) prices with minimal extended cross-entropy relative to some set of benchmark AD prices. We show that these two methods are equivalent in that they generate identical pricing functions. They avoid the dependence on the numeraire and replace it by the dependence on the benchmark pricing function. This benchmark pricing function, however, can be chosen based on economic considerations, in contrast to the arbitrary choice of the numeraire.","PeriodicalId":151935,"journal":{"name":"EFA 2002 Submissions","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pricing Derivative Securities Using Cross-Entropy: An Economic Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Nicole Branger\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.400060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper analyses two implied methods to determine the pricing function for derivatives when the market is incomplete. First, we consider the choice of an equivalent martingale measure with minimal cross-entropy relative to a given benchmark measure. We show that the choice of the numeraire has an impact on the resulting pricing function, but that there is no sound economic answer to the question which numeraire to choose. The ad-hoc choice of the numeraire introduces an element of arbitrariness into the pricing function, thus contradicting the motivation of this method as the least prejudiced way to choose the pricing operator. Second, we propose two new methods to select a pricing function: the choice of the stochastic discount factor (SDF) with minimalextendedcross-entropy relative to a given benchmark SDF, and the choice of the Arrow–Debreu (AD) prices with minimal extended cross-entropy relative to some set of benchmark AD prices. We show that these two methods are equivalent in that they generate identical pricing functions. They avoid the dependence on the numeraire and replace it by the dependence on the benchmark pricing function. This benchmark pricing function, however, can be chosen based on economic considerations, in contrast to the arbitrary choice of the numeraire.\",\"PeriodicalId\":151935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EFA 2002 Submissions\",\"volume\":\"97 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EFA 2002 Submissions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.400060\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFA 2002 Submissions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.400060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

本文分析了在市场不完全条件下确定衍生品定价函数的两种隐含方法。首先,我们考虑相对于给定基准度量具有最小交叉熵的等效鞅度量的选择。我们表明,数字的选择对产生的定价函数有影响,但对于选择哪个数字的问题没有可靠的经济答案。数值的临时选择为定价函数引入了随意性元素,从而与该方法作为最小偏见选择定价算子的动机相矛盾。其次,我们提出了两种新的定价函数选择方法:选择相对于给定基准SDF具有最小扩展交叉熵的随机折扣因子(SDF),以及相对于一组基准AD价格具有最小扩展交叉熵的Arrow-Debreu (AD)价格。我们证明这两种方法是等价的,因为它们产生相同的定价函数。它们避免了对数值的依赖,代之以对基准定价函数的依赖。但是,可以根据经济考虑来选择这个基准定价函数,而不是随意选择数字。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pricing Derivative Securities Using Cross-Entropy: An Economic Analysis
This paper analyses two implied methods to determine the pricing function for derivatives when the market is incomplete. First, we consider the choice of an equivalent martingale measure with minimal cross-entropy relative to a given benchmark measure. We show that the choice of the numeraire has an impact on the resulting pricing function, but that there is no sound economic answer to the question which numeraire to choose. The ad-hoc choice of the numeraire introduces an element of arbitrariness into the pricing function, thus contradicting the motivation of this method as the least prejudiced way to choose the pricing operator. Second, we propose two new methods to select a pricing function: the choice of the stochastic discount factor (SDF) with minimalextendedcross-entropy relative to a given benchmark SDF, and the choice of the Arrow–Debreu (AD) prices with minimal extended cross-entropy relative to some set of benchmark AD prices. We show that these two methods are equivalent in that they generate identical pricing functions. They avoid the dependence on the numeraire and replace it by the dependence on the benchmark pricing function. This benchmark pricing function, however, can be chosen based on economic considerations, in contrast to the arbitrary choice of the numeraire.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信