哈贝马斯与黑格尔反对康德的义务:理想的现实主义概念

Antonio Pérez Quintana
{"title":"哈贝马斯与黑格尔反对康德的义务:理想的现实主义概念","authors":"Antonio Pérez Quintana","doi":"10.25145/j.laguna.2022.50.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Habermas shares with Kant the commitment to the posible, the ideal and duty to be moral, and with Hegel, the critique of the abstract carácter of kantian possibility and ought-be, as well as the realistic attention to the conditions of the really posible and the ideal. In this paper I intend to show that the confluence of such motifs, Kantian and Hegelian, in Habermas’ thought allows us to detect the keys to a conception of what should be and the ideal that does justice to the two essential features of what is really posible: the refence to the future and to conditions embedded in the real.","PeriodicalId":364417,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Filosofía Laguna","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Habermas ante las objeciones de Hegel contra el deber ser kantiano: una concepción realista de lo ideal\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Pérez Quintana\",\"doi\":\"10.25145/j.laguna.2022.50.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Habermas shares with Kant the commitment to the posible, the ideal and duty to be moral, and with Hegel, the critique of the abstract carácter of kantian possibility and ought-be, as well as the realistic attention to the conditions of the really posible and the ideal. In this paper I intend to show that the confluence of such motifs, Kantian and Hegelian, in Habermas’ thought allows us to detect the keys to a conception of what should be and the ideal that does justice to the two essential features of what is really posible: the refence to the future and to conditions embedded in the real.\",\"PeriodicalId\":364417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Filosofía Laguna\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Filosofía Laguna\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25145/j.laguna.2022.50.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Filosofía Laguna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25145/j.laguna.2022.50.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

哈贝马斯和康德一样,对可能的、理想的和道德的义务有共同的追求;和黑格尔一样,对康德的可能性和应该的抽象carácter有共同的批判,对真正可能的和理想的条件有共同的现实的注意。在本文中,我打算表明,哈贝马斯思想中康德式和黑格尔式这类主题的融合,使我们能够发现“应该是什么”和“理想”这两个概念的关键,这两个概念公正地体现了真正可能的两个基本特征:对未来的参考和对嵌入现实的条件的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Habermas ante las objeciones de Hegel contra el deber ser kantiano: una concepción realista de lo ideal
Habermas shares with Kant the commitment to the posible, the ideal and duty to be moral, and with Hegel, the critique of the abstract carácter of kantian possibility and ought-be, as well as the realistic attention to the conditions of the really posible and the ideal. In this paper I intend to show that the confluence of such motifs, Kantian and Hegelian, in Habermas’ thought allows us to detect the keys to a conception of what should be and the ideal that does justice to the two essential features of what is really posible: the refence to the future and to conditions embedded in the real.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信