历史的视角

Naazneen H Barma, S. Vogel
{"title":"历史的视角","authors":"Naazneen H Barma, S. Vogel","doi":"10.4324/9781003047162-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"NOTHING could please me more than to be with you at this meeting and to have the privilege of introducing this symposium. The time does not seem so very long ago since I went frequently to meetings such as this. In those days, and I speak of the 1950s, the pain of inflammation was treated with aspirin, phenacetin, and phenylbutazone. These were, and are, useful analgesics but they clearly have their limitations. Indomethacin was just starting its long path from the laboratory to the clinic, and it was by no means clear that the early versions of this molecule would have clinical utility, especially since the animal models in those days were of such speculative value. At this stage fate intervened in the form of a letter from Dr Walter Bauer, Professor of Rheumatology at Harvard Medical School and the 'grey eminence' of American rheumatologists. On 12 Feburary, 1953, he wrote to Dr Randolph Major, our then Director of Research. His request asked if Merck could synthesize a better aspirin. He thereby eliminated new corticosteroids from consideration but still left a good deal of room for speculation. As a consequence I paid a visit to Cambridge and tried to clarify whether Dr Bauer had a pharmacological or a chemical equivalent of aspirin, or perhaps both, in mind. After much discussion and cogitation, we concluded that our goal should be a salicylic acid molecule whose pharmacological properties were superior in terms of safety and efficacy to aspirin itself. Pursuit of this objective required a strong dose of optimism, since such an abundance of salicylates had been synthesized and tested without any great progress. After all, extracts of willow bark had been used for a great variety of agues and so-called 'intermitting disorders' from the earliest of times. Even the effectiveness of salicylates as a specific remedy for rheumatic fever was reported in the Lancet (Maclagan, 1876). With the advent of synthetic chemistry, salicylic acid became a medicinal prototype for which improvements were sought early and often. In fact, there are few prototypes which have so steadfastly refused to allow themselves to be improved on as aspirin. Nonetheless, through persistence and good fortune, a group of collaborators succeeded in synthesizing a new molecule which was brought through development and into the clinic. May I express the hope that, as you weigh the data, you will feel that it approaches what Dr Bauer had in mind.","PeriodicalId":267163,"journal":{"name":"The Political Economy Reader","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Historical Perspectives\",\"authors\":\"Naazneen H Barma, S. Vogel\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781003047162-16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"NOTHING could please me more than to be with you at this meeting and to have the privilege of introducing this symposium. The time does not seem so very long ago since I went frequently to meetings such as this. In those days, and I speak of the 1950s, the pain of inflammation was treated with aspirin, phenacetin, and phenylbutazone. These were, and are, useful analgesics but they clearly have their limitations. Indomethacin was just starting its long path from the laboratory to the clinic, and it was by no means clear that the early versions of this molecule would have clinical utility, especially since the animal models in those days were of such speculative value. At this stage fate intervened in the form of a letter from Dr Walter Bauer, Professor of Rheumatology at Harvard Medical School and the 'grey eminence' of American rheumatologists. On 12 Feburary, 1953, he wrote to Dr Randolph Major, our then Director of Research. His request asked if Merck could synthesize a better aspirin. He thereby eliminated new corticosteroids from consideration but still left a good deal of room for speculation. As a consequence I paid a visit to Cambridge and tried to clarify whether Dr Bauer had a pharmacological or a chemical equivalent of aspirin, or perhaps both, in mind. After much discussion and cogitation, we concluded that our goal should be a salicylic acid molecule whose pharmacological properties were superior in terms of safety and efficacy to aspirin itself. Pursuit of this objective required a strong dose of optimism, since such an abundance of salicylates had been synthesized and tested without any great progress. After all, extracts of willow bark had been used for a great variety of agues and so-called 'intermitting disorders' from the earliest of times. Even the effectiveness of salicylates as a specific remedy for rheumatic fever was reported in the Lancet (Maclagan, 1876). With the advent of synthetic chemistry, salicylic acid became a medicinal prototype for which improvements were sought early and often. In fact, there are few prototypes which have so steadfastly refused to allow themselves to be improved on as aspirin. Nonetheless, through persistence and good fortune, a group of collaborators succeeded in synthesizing a new molecule which was brought through development and into the clinic. May I express the hope that, as you weigh the data, you will feel that it approaches what Dr Bauer had in mind.\",\"PeriodicalId\":267163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Political Economy Reader\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Political Economy Reader\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003047162-16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Political Economy Reader","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003047162-16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

没有什么比和你们一起出席这次会议并有幸介绍这次研讨会更让我高兴的了。自从我经常参加这样的会议以来,时间似乎并没有太久。在那些日子里,我说的是20世纪50年代,炎症的疼痛是用阿司匹林、非那西丁和苯丁酮治疗的。这些都是有用的镇痛药,但它们显然有其局限性。当时,吲哚美辛刚刚开始从实验室走向临床的漫长道路,而且还不清楚这种分子的早期版本是否会有临床用途,特别是因为当时的动物模型具有如此高的推测价值。在这个阶段,命运以一封来自哈佛医学院风湿病学教授沃尔特·鲍尔博士的信的形式介入了,他是美国风湿病学家中的“灰色人物”。1953年2月12日,他写信给当时的研究部主任伦道夫·梅杰博士。他询问默克公司是否能合成一种更好的阿司匹林。因此,他从考虑中排除了新的皮质类固醇,但仍然留下了很大的猜测空间。因此,我访问了剑桥,试图弄清楚鲍尔博士脑子里想的是阿司匹林的药理学或化学等效物,还是两者都有。经过大量的讨论和思考,我们得出结论,我们的目标应该是一种药理性质在安全性和有效性方面优于阿司匹林本身的水杨酸分子。追求这一目标需要强烈的乐观,因为如此丰富的水杨酸酯已经合成和测试,没有任何重大进展。毕竟,从最早的时候起,柳树皮的提取物就被用于治疗各种各样的疾病和所谓的“间歇性疾病”。甚至在《柳叶刀》(Maclagan, 1876)上也报道了水杨酸盐作为风湿热的特效药的有效性。随着合成化学的出现,水杨酸成为早期和经常寻求改进的药物原型。事实上,很少有药物的原型像阿司匹林一样,如此坚决地拒绝让自己被改进。尽管如此,通过坚持不懈和幸运,一组合作者成功地合成了一种新的分子,并通过开发进入了临床。请允许我表达这样的希望,当你权衡这些数据时,你会觉得它接近鲍尔博士的想法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Historical Perspectives
NOTHING could please me more than to be with you at this meeting and to have the privilege of introducing this symposium. The time does not seem so very long ago since I went frequently to meetings such as this. In those days, and I speak of the 1950s, the pain of inflammation was treated with aspirin, phenacetin, and phenylbutazone. These were, and are, useful analgesics but they clearly have their limitations. Indomethacin was just starting its long path from the laboratory to the clinic, and it was by no means clear that the early versions of this molecule would have clinical utility, especially since the animal models in those days were of such speculative value. At this stage fate intervened in the form of a letter from Dr Walter Bauer, Professor of Rheumatology at Harvard Medical School and the 'grey eminence' of American rheumatologists. On 12 Feburary, 1953, he wrote to Dr Randolph Major, our then Director of Research. His request asked if Merck could synthesize a better aspirin. He thereby eliminated new corticosteroids from consideration but still left a good deal of room for speculation. As a consequence I paid a visit to Cambridge and tried to clarify whether Dr Bauer had a pharmacological or a chemical equivalent of aspirin, or perhaps both, in mind. After much discussion and cogitation, we concluded that our goal should be a salicylic acid molecule whose pharmacological properties were superior in terms of safety and efficacy to aspirin itself. Pursuit of this objective required a strong dose of optimism, since such an abundance of salicylates had been synthesized and tested without any great progress. After all, extracts of willow bark had been used for a great variety of agues and so-called 'intermitting disorders' from the earliest of times. Even the effectiveness of salicylates as a specific remedy for rheumatic fever was reported in the Lancet (Maclagan, 1876). With the advent of synthetic chemistry, salicylic acid became a medicinal prototype for which improvements were sought early and often. In fact, there are few prototypes which have so steadfastly refused to allow themselves to be improved on as aspirin. Nonetheless, through persistence and good fortune, a group of collaborators succeeded in synthesizing a new molecule which was brought through development and into the clinic. May I express the hope that, as you weigh the data, you will feel that it approaches what Dr Bauer had in mind.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信