从街角小店到大型跨国公司:自愿管理是否仍应是一刀切的程序?我们需要一个小企业救助的快速通道系统吗?

Jason Harris
{"title":"从街角小店到大型跨国公司:自愿管理是否仍应是一刀切的程序?我们需要一个小企业救助的快速通道系统吗?","authors":"Jason Harris","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2652552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Voluntary administration provides a formal corporate rescue mechanism under both Australia’s and New Zealand’s corporate insolvency laws. It was designed to provide a fast and efficient means for promoting corporate rescue. The goal of saving businesses was specifically included in the statutory objects. The voluntary administration process is a 'one size fits all' model that has been applied to all business types since its inception, from corner shops to large multinationals but it seems to be decreasing in popularity in Australia and has never really taken off in New Zealand. Liquidation and receiverships are far more popular than voluntary administrations. In Australia, fewer than 1 in 5 insolvencies go through voluntary administration and in New Zealand the number is far fewer. This essay argues that voluntary administration has become too expensive for small and medium size businesses and that the one-size fits all model no longer achieves the stated statutory purpose. The essay discusses options for a more streamlined system for SME businesses. Given the much longer time period since its introduction (over 20 years), the paper uses Australia as a case study and makes references throughout to comparable provisions in New Zealand. The criticism of the voluntary administration procedure, and the options for law reform, apply equally to both jurisdictions.","PeriodicalId":137765,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Private Law - Financial Law eJournal","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Corner Shop to Large Multinational: Should Voluntary Administration Remain a One-Size-Fits-All Procedure? Do We Need a Fast Track System for Small Business Rescues?\",\"authors\":\"Jason Harris\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2652552\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Voluntary administration provides a formal corporate rescue mechanism under both Australia’s and New Zealand’s corporate insolvency laws. It was designed to provide a fast and efficient means for promoting corporate rescue. The goal of saving businesses was specifically included in the statutory objects. The voluntary administration process is a 'one size fits all' model that has been applied to all business types since its inception, from corner shops to large multinationals but it seems to be decreasing in popularity in Australia and has never really taken off in New Zealand. Liquidation and receiverships are far more popular than voluntary administrations. In Australia, fewer than 1 in 5 insolvencies go through voluntary administration and in New Zealand the number is far fewer. This essay argues that voluntary administration has become too expensive for small and medium size businesses and that the one-size fits all model no longer achieves the stated statutory purpose. The essay discusses options for a more streamlined system for SME businesses. Given the much longer time period since its introduction (over 20 years), the paper uses Australia as a case study and makes references throughout to comparable provisions in New Zealand. The criticism of the voluntary administration procedure, and the options for law reform, apply equally to both jurisdictions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":137765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law & Society: Private Law - Financial Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law & Society: Private Law - Financial Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2652552\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: Private Law - Financial Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2652552","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据澳大利亚和新西兰的公司破产法,自愿管理提供了一种正式的公司救助机制。它的目的是为促进企业救助提供一种快速有效的手段。将拯救企业的目标具体纳入法定对象。自愿管理过程是一种“一刀切”的模式,从一开始就适用于所有的商业类型,从街角的商店到大型跨国公司,但它在澳大利亚似乎越来越不受欢迎,在新西兰也从未真正流行起来。清算和接管比自愿管理更受欢迎。在澳大利亚,只有不到五分之一的破产企业通过自愿管理,而在新西兰,这一数字要少得多。本文认为,对于中小企业来说,自愿管理已经变得过于昂贵,一刀切的模式不再达到既定的法定目的。本文讨论了为中小企业建立更精简的制度的方案。鉴于自引入以来的时间要长得多(超过20年),本文以澳大利亚为案例研究,并在整个过程中参考了新西兰的可比规定。对自愿行政程序的批评和法律改革的选择同样适用于两个司法管辖区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From Corner Shop to Large Multinational: Should Voluntary Administration Remain a One-Size-Fits-All Procedure? Do We Need a Fast Track System for Small Business Rescues?
Voluntary administration provides a formal corporate rescue mechanism under both Australia’s and New Zealand’s corporate insolvency laws. It was designed to provide a fast and efficient means for promoting corporate rescue. The goal of saving businesses was specifically included in the statutory objects. The voluntary administration process is a 'one size fits all' model that has been applied to all business types since its inception, from corner shops to large multinationals but it seems to be decreasing in popularity in Australia and has never really taken off in New Zealand. Liquidation and receiverships are far more popular than voluntary administrations. In Australia, fewer than 1 in 5 insolvencies go through voluntary administration and in New Zealand the number is far fewer. This essay argues that voluntary administration has become too expensive for small and medium size businesses and that the one-size fits all model no longer achieves the stated statutory purpose. The essay discusses options for a more streamlined system for SME businesses. Given the much longer time period since its introduction (over 20 years), the paper uses Australia as a case study and makes references throughout to comparable provisions in New Zealand. The criticism of the voluntary administration procedure, and the options for law reform, apply equally to both jurisdictions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信