低密度城市主义的长期考古重新评价:对当代城市的启示

S. Hawken, Roland J. Fletcher
{"title":"低密度城市主义的长期考古重新评价:对当代城市的启示","authors":"S. Hawken, Roland J. Fletcher","doi":"10.1484/J.JUA.5.123674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Roland Fletcher is Professor of Theoretical and World Archaeology at the University of Sydney, Australia. He is the director of the University of Sydney’s twenty-year Angkor Research Program and is an annual visiting research fellow at Centre for Urban Network Evolutions (UrbNet). ABSTRACT Dispersed, low-density urbanism has conventionally been considered as a unique consequence of industrialization and factors such as mechanized transport. Pre-industrial urbanism by contrast, has been perceived almost entirely in terms of compact densely inhabited cities with a strong differentiation between an urban and a rural populace. Evidence demonstrates, low-density settlements were a notable feature of the agrarian-urban world, especially in the tropics, and have been a characteristic of every known socio-economic system used by Homo sapiens. This paper situates past examples of large, low-density, dispersed urban settlements, with their long histories and their distinct patterns of growth and demise, in relation to contemporary low-density cities. This critical reappraisal of low-density, dispersed cities in the context of a long and culturally diverse urban past is significant for addressing urban sustainability challenges.","PeriodicalId":141912,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Archaeology","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Long-Term Archaeological Reappraisal of Low-Density Urbanism: Implications for Contemporary Cities\",\"authors\":\"S. Hawken, Roland J. Fletcher\",\"doi\":\"10.1484/J.JUA.5.123674\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Roland Fletcher is Professor of Theoretical and World Archaeology at the University of Sydney, Australia. He is the director of the University of Sydney’s twenty-year Angkor Research Program and is an annual visiting research fellow at Centre for Urban Network Evolutions (UrbNet). ABSTRACT Dispersed, low-density urbanism has conventionally been considered as a unique consequence of industrialization and factors such as mechanized transport. Pre-industrial urbanism by contrast, has been perceived almost entirely in terms of compact densely inhabited cities with a strong differentiation between an urban and a rural populace. Evidence demonstrates, low-density settlements were a notable feature of the agrarian-urban world, especially in the tropics, and have been a characteristic of every known socio-economic system used by Homo sapiens. This paper situates past examples of large, low-density, dispersed urban settlements, with their long histories and their distinct patterns of growth and demise, in relation to contemporary low-density cities. This critical reappraisal of low-density, dispersed cities in the context of a long and culturally diverse urban past is significant for addressing urban sustainability challenges.\",\"PeriodicalId\":141912,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Urban Archaeology\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Urban Archaeology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1484/J.JUA.5.123674\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1484/J.JUA.5.123674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

罗兰·弗莱彻是澳大利亚悉尼大学理论与世界考古学教授。他是悉尼大学20年吴哥研究项目的负责人,也是城市网络发展中心(UrbNet)的年度访问研究员。传统上,分散、低密度的城市化被认为是工业化和机械化运输等因素的独特结果。相比之下,工业化前的城市化几乎完全被认为是紧凑密集的城市,城市人口和农村人口之间有很大的差别。证据表明,低密度定居点是农业-城市世界的一个显著特征,特别是在热带地区,也是智人使用的每一个已知的社会经济系统的一个特征。本文将过去的大型、低密度、分散的城市住区的例子与当代低密度城市进行对比,这些城市住区有着悠久的历史和独特的增长和消亡模式。在城市历史悠久、文化多样的背景下,对低密度、分散的城市进行批判性的重新评估,对于解决城市可持续性挑战具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Long-Term Archaeological Reappraisal of Low-Density Urbanism: Implications for Contemporary Cities
Roland Fletcher is Professor of Theoretical and World Archaeology at the University of Sydney, Australia. He is the director of the University of Sydney’s twenty-year Angkor Research Program and is an annual visiting research fellow at Centre for Urban Network Evolutions (UrbNet). ABSTRACT Dispersed, low-density urbanism has conventionally been considered as a unique consequence of industrialization and factors such as mechanized transport. Pre-industrial urbanism by contrast, has been perceived almost entirely in terms of compact densely inhabited cities with a strong differentiation between an urban and a rural populace. Evidence demonstrates, low-density settlements were a notable feature of the agrarian-urban world, especially in the tropics, and have been a characteristic of every known socio-economic system used by Homo sapiens. This paper situates past examples of large, low-density, dispersed urban settlements, with their long histories and their distinct patterns of growth and demise, in relation to contemporary low-density cities. This critical reappraisal of low-density, dispersed cities in the context of a long and culturally diverse urban past is significant for addressing urban sustainability challenges.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信