异步在线讨论中学习者的批判性思维特征

Jie Gao, Wenge Guo, Mengqian Wang
{"title":"异步在线讨论中学习者的批判性思维特征","authors":"Jie Gao, Wenge Guo, Mengqian Wang","doi":"10.1109/EITT.2017.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the development of the Internet and the explosive increase of information, the ability of critical thinking to identify, discriminate and utilize the Internet information has become a significant skill of digital literacy. Asynchronous online discussion is an important way to cultivate learners' critical thinking, which has been widely adopted by MOOC and SPOC. Focusing on the characteristics of learners' critical thinking in the asynchronous online discussion, this research adopted the content analysis method, and used Newman's critical thinking depth coding schema to analyze learners' discussion text in a Digital Reading Online Course. The analysis showed that learners could express their opinions by integrating external knowledge and experience appropriately in asynchronous online discussion, but lack of a sense of evidence-based expression, which resulted that learners' expressions are full of opinions while lack of proofs. Besides, learners were weak in clarifying themselves, so they often gave ambiguous and unclear ideas. The findings are consistent with the situation of writing education in Chinese, which emphasizes opinions, emotions and rhetoric, but does not value the importance of evidence-based writing and accurate expression.","PeriodicalId":412662,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learners' Critical Thinking Characteristics in Asynchronous Online Discussion\",\"authors\":\"Jie Gao, Wenge Guo, Mengqian Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EITT.2017.25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the development of the Internet and the explosive increase of information, the ability of critical thinking to identify, discriminate and utilize the Internet information has become a significant skill of digital literacy. Asynchronous online discussion is an important way to cultivate learners' critical thinking, which has been widely adopted by MOOC and SPOC. Focusing on the characteristics of learners' critical thinking in the asynchronous online discussion, this research adopted the content analysis method, and used Newman's critical thinking depth coding schema to analyze learners' discussion text in a Digital Reading Online Course. The analysis showed that learners could express their opinions by integrating external knowledge and experience appropriately in asynchronous online discussion, but lack of a sense of evidence-based expression, which resulted that learners' expressions are full of opinions while lack of proofs. Besides, learners were weak in clarifying themselves, so they often gave ambiguous and unclear ideas. The findings are consistent with the situation of writing education in Chinese, which emphasizes opinions, emotions and rhetoric, but does not value the importance of evidence-based writing and accurate expression.\",\"PeriodicalId\":412662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT)\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EITT.2017.25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EITT.2017.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

随着互联网的发展和信息的爆炸式增长,批判性思维识别、区分和利用互联网信息的能力已经成为数字素养的重要技能。异步在线讨论是培养学习者批判性思维的重要方式,已被MOOC和SPOC广泛采用。针对异步在线讨论中学习者批判性思维的特点,本研究采用内容分析法,运用Newman的批判性思维深度编码图式对《数字阅读在线课程》中学习者的讨论文本进行分析。分析表明,在异步在线讨论中,学习者可以通过适当整合外部知识和经验来表达自己的观点,但缺乏基于证据的表达意识,导致学习者的表达充满了观点而缺乏证据。此外,学习者的自我澄清能力较弱,因此他们经常给出模棱两可和不明确的想法。这一发现与中国写作教育的现状一致,即强调观点、情感和修辞,而不重视循证写作和准确表达的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Learners' Critical Thinking Characteristics in Asynchronous Online Discussion
With the development of the Internet and the explosive increase of information, the ability of critical thinking to identify, discriminate and utilize the Internet information has become a significant skill of digital literacy. Asynchronous online discussion is an important way to cultivate learners' critical thinking, which has been widely adopted by MOOC and SPOC. Focusing on the characteristics of learners' critical thinking in the asynchronous online discussion, this research adopted the content analysis method, and used Newman's critical thinking depth coding schema to analyze learners' discussion text in a Digital Reading Online Course. The analysis showed that learners could express their opinions by integrating external knowledge and experience appropriately in asynchronous online discussion, but lack of a sense of evidence-based expression, which resulted that learners' expressions are full of opinions while lack of proofs. Besides, learners were weak in clarifying themselves, so they often gave ambiguous and unclear ideas. The findings are consistent with the situation of writing education in Chinese, which emphasizes opinions, emotions and rhetoric, but does not value the importance of evidence-based writing and accurate expression.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信