世界贸易组织石棉案与争端解决:专家组与上诉机构之间的不稳定关系

Michigan Journal of International Law Pub Date : 2002-06-21 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.310002

S. M. Cone

{"title":"世界贸易组织石棉案与争端解决:专家组与上诉机构之间的不稳定关系","authors":"S. M. Cone","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.310002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article deals with dispute settlement in the World Trade Organization (WTO) and, in particular, with the relationshiop between panels and the Appellate Body. Its point of departure is the Asbestos case initially decided by a WTO panel in September 2000 and, on appeal, by the WTO Appellate Body in March 2001.","PeriodicalId":331401,"journal":{"name":"Michigan Journal of International Law","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Asbestos Case and Dispute Settlement in the World Trade Organization: The Uneasy Relationship Between Panels and the Appellate Body\",\"authors\":\"S. M. Cone\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.310002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article deals with dispute settlement in the World Trade Organization (WTO) and, in particular, with the relationshiop between panels and the Appellate Body. Its point of departure is the Asbestos case initially decided by a WTO panel in September 2000 and, on appeal, by the WTO Appellate Body in March 2001.\",\"PeriodicalId\":331401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Michigan Journal of International Law\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Michigan Journal of International Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.310002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Michigan Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.310002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

摘要

本文论述世界贸易组织(WTO)的争端解决，特别是专家组与上诉机构之间的关系。它的出发点是石棉案，该案件最初由世贸组织一个小组于2000年9月作出裁决，并于2001年3月由世贸组织上诉机构提出上诉。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Asbestos Case and Dispute Settlement in the World Trade Organization: The Uneasy Relationship Between Panels and the Appellate Body

This article deals with dispute settlement in the World Trade Organization (WTO) and, in particular, with the relationshiop between panels and the Appellate Body. Its point of departure is the Asbestos case initially decided by a WTO panel in September 2000 and, on appeal, by the WTO Appellate Body in March 2001.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Michigan Journal of International Law

自引率

0.00%

发文量