小纸板包装形状的抗压性

Josip Bota, Sonja Jamnicki Hanzer, D. Banić, M. Brozović
{"title":"小纸板包装形状的抗压性","authors":"Josip Bota, Sonja Jamnicki Hanzer, D. Banić, M. Brozović","doi":"10.24867/GRID-2018-P29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rectangles are the most common packaging shapes. Their stability under compression can vary according to different types of paperboard as well as panels ratios. Rectangular shapes have advantages in transportation and production but are not the only shapes that paperboard packaging has to offer. This paper investigates seven packaging shapes with different cross-sections while keeping the same height and amount of material used. The tested shapes were made with two types of paperboard (with recycled fibre and virgin pulp) and different grammage. The testing was conducted using a modified Crush Test (Lorentzen & Wettre Crush Tester). The results showed that cylinder shape has the most compression resistance while triangular prism and rectangular prism (1:4 panel ratio) the least. Testing rectangles with different panel ratios together with the results of other shapes led to the conclusion that compression resistance mainly depends on the size of the panel. If a shape has larger (less number of) panels it has less resistance to vertical pressure (stackability).","PeriodicalId":371126,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 9th International Symposium on Graphic Engineering and Design","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPRESSION RESISTANCE OF SMALL PAPERBOARD PACKAGING SHAPES\",\"authors\":\"Josip Bota, Sonja Jamnicki Hanzer, D. Banić, M. Brozović\",\"doi\":\"10.24867/GRID-2018-P29\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rectangles are the most common packaging shapes. Their stability under compression can vary according to different types of paperboard as well as panels ratios. Rectangular shapes have advantages in transportation and production but are not the only shapes that paperboard packaging has to offer. This paper investigates seven packaging shapes with different cross-sections while keeping the same height and amount of material used. The tested shapes were made with two types of paperboard (with recycled fibre and virgin pulp) and different grammage. The testing was conducted using a modified Crush Test (Lorentzen & Wettre Crush Tester). The results showed that cylinder shape has the most compression resistance while triangular prism and rectangular prism (1:4 panel ratio) the least. Testing rectangles with different panel ratios together with the results of other shapes led to the conclusion that compression resistance mainly depends on the size of the panel. If a shape has larger (less number of) panels it has less resistance to vertical pressure (stackability).\",\"PeriodicalId\":371126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of 9th International Symposium on Graphic Engineering and Design\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of 9th International Symposium on Graphic Engineering and Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24867/GRID-2018-P29\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 9th International Symposium on Graphic Engineering and Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24867/GRID-2018-P29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

矩形是最常见的包装形状。它们在压缩下的稳定性可以根据不同类型的纸板以及面板比率而变化。矩形形状在运输和生产中有优势,但并不是纸板包装所能提供的唯一形状。本文研究了七种不同截面的包装形状,同时保持相同的高度和材料使用量。测试的形状由两种类型的纸板(回收纤维和原始纸浆)和不同的克重制成。测试采用改良的碾压试验(Lorentzen & Wettre碾压试验机)进行。结果表明:柱状结构的抗压能力最强,三角棱柱和矩形棱柱(面板比为1:4)的抗压能力最小;通过对不同面板比矩形和其他形状矩形的测试,得出面板抗压性能主要取决于面板尺寸的结论。如果一个形状有更大的(更少的)面板,它对垂直压力的抵抗力就更小(可堆叠性)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COMPRESSION RESISTANCE OF SMALL PAPERBOARD PACKAGING SHAPES
Rectangles are the most common packaging shapes. Their stability under compression can vary according to different types of paperboard as well as panels ratios. Rectangular shapes have advantages in transportation and production but are not the only shapes that paperboard packaging has to offer. This paper investigates seven packaging shapes with different cross-sections while keeping the same height and amount of material used. The tested shapes were made with two types of paperboard (with recycled fibre and virgin pulp) and different grammage. The testing was conducted using a modified Crush Test (Lorentzen & Wettre Crush Tester). The results showed that cylinder shape has the most compression resistance while triangular prism and rectangular prism (1:4 panel ratio) the least. Testing rectangles with different panel ratios together with the results of other shapes led to the conclusion that compression resistance mainly depends on the size of the panel. If a shape has larger (less number of) panels it has less resistance to vertical pressure (stackability).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信