哈罗德人和卡莱肯人:建议的和解与综合

M. Setterfield
{"title":"哈罗德人和卡莱肯人:建议的和解与综合","authors":"M. Setterfield","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3859512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Kaleckian and Harrodian approaches to growth frequently arrive at antagonistic<br>positions with respect to key issues in heterodox macrodynamics, including the treatment <br>of the rate of capacity utilization and the very nature of the long-run growth<br>process. Nevertheless, this paper is devoted to exploring the possibilities for reconciling <br>and even synthesizing these traditions. It does so by directly addressing three key<br>areas of dispute: the Keynesian stability condition; Harrodian instability; and the question <br>as to whether long-run growth is best conceived in terms of a stable steady state<br>or `corridor instability'. It is shown that reconciliation and even synthesis is possible<br>- the latter producing a `corridor within a corridor' conception of the growth process<br>in which the economy switches between Kaleckian and Harrodian dynamics depending<br>on the extent to which the rate of capacity utilization departs from its normal rate.","PeriodicalId":123778,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Theoretical Dynamic Models (Topic)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Harrodians and Kaleckians: A Suggested Reconciliation and Synthesis\",\"authors\":\"M. Setterfield\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3859512\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Kaleckian and Harrodian approaches to growth frequently arrive at antagonistic<br>positions with respect to key issues in heterodox macrodynamics, including the treatment <br>of the rate of capacity utilization and the very nature of the long-run growth<br>process. Nevertheless, this paper is devoted to exploring the possibilities for reconciling <br>and even synthesizing these traditions. It does so by directly addressing three key<br>areas of dispute: the Keynesian stability condition; Harrodian instability; and the question <br>as to whether long-run growth is best conceived in terms of a stable steady state<br>or `corridor instability'. It is shown that reconciliation and even synthesis is possible<br>- the latter producing a `corridor within a corridor' conception of the growth process<br>in which the economy switches between Kaleckian and Harrodian dynamics depending<br>on the extent to which the rate of capacity utilization departs from its normal rate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":123778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Theoretical Dynamic Models (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Theoretical Dynamic Models (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3859512\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Theoretical Dynamic Models (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3859512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卡莱肯学派和哈罗德学派的增长方法经常在非正统宏观动力学的关键问题上产生对立的立场,包括对产能利用率的处理和长期增长过程的本质。然而,本文致力于探索调和甚至综合这些传统的可能性。它通过直接解决三个关键的争议领域来做到这一点:凯恩斯稳定条件;Harrodian不稳定;还有一个问题是,长期增长的最佳构想是稳定的稳定状态,还是“走廊不稳定”。研究表明,调和甚至综合是可能的——后者产生了一个关于增长过程的“走廊中的走廊”概念,在这个概念中,经济根据产能利用率偏离正常水平的程度在卡莱肯和哈罗德动态之间切换。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Harrodians and Kaleckians: A Suggested Reconciliation and Synthesis
The Kaleckian and Harrodian approaches to growth frequently arrive at antagonistic
positions with respect to key issues in heterodox macrodynamics, including the treatment
of the rate of capacity utilization and the very nature of the long-run growth
process. Nevertheless, this paper is devoted to exploring the possibilities for reconciling
and even synthesizing these traditions. It does so by directly addressing three key
areas of dispute: the Keynesian stability condition; Harrodian instability; and the question
as to whether long-run growth is best conceived in terms of a stable steady state
or `corridor instability'. It is shown that reconciliation and even synthesis is possible
- the latter producing a `corridor within a corridor' conception of the growth process
in which the economy switches between Kaleckian and Harrodian dynamics depending
on the extent to which the rate of capacity utilization departs from its normal rate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信