供应与制造网络的生成与模块化仿真模型

Pavel Gocev, Tim Hellfeuer
{"title":"供应与制造网络的生成与模块化仿真模型","authors":"Pavel Gocev, Tim Hellfeuer","doi":"10.11128/arep.59.a59004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The application of Discrete-Event Simulation (DES) models for purposes of planning and optimization of factories and supply networks is characterized with various abstraction levels and granularities of the model structure. These two aspects are dependent on the complexity of the systems to be simulated, the business goals to be achieved and the project objectives where the simulation models are deployed. This is especially intensified when different product parts and components on different levels withn the supply networks are included into one model, like production lines and work centers within existing and emerging factory shop floors combined with the network of suppliers and additionally flavoured with the ramp up of new products, new work centers or both. Very often the complexity is increased due to the organizational nature of production types and different project groups with own modelling paradigms. This is particularly a characteristic of supply networks that deliver very complex commodity products like whole power plants or respective components. The usual foundation to describe and model such complex systems is the data around the three principal consisting domains (PPR): Products to be delivered (raw-materials, parts, components, finished products), Processes that produce them (from supply chain steps down to operational steps) and Resources necessary to acomplish the work (suppliers, factories, production lines, work centers, machines, etc.). Yet the data is not enough to build the simulation model that, following the paradigm of digital twin, also represents its behaviour as well as the interdependencies between the consisting elements within the PPR-Domains. These interactions, behaviours, and cause-and-effect graphs are usually embodied as a procedural programming, affecting the scope and the depth of the modelled logic and therewith they influence the abstraction levels within the model. The situation is even more complex, in a case when the simulation models represent a workshop-like production and the same simulation model is intended to be deployed for various factories and different products within one big and multifaceted company like Siemens Energy. In opposite of the typical assembly lines like in automotive or electronics industry, here we are talking about product and respective parts and components that are running through different resources in an arbitrary sequence defined by product features and manufactruing technologies available in the considered factories or within the supply network.","PeriodicalId":330615,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings ASIM SST 2020","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generative and Modular Simulation Models for Supply and Manufacturing Networks\",\"authors\":\"Pavel Gocev, Tim Hellfeuer\",\"doi\":\"10.11128/arep.59.a59004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The application of Discrete-Event Simulation (DES) models for purposes of planning and optimization of factories and supply networks is characterized with various abstraction levels and granularities of the model structure. These two aspects are dependent on the complexity of the systems to be simulated, the business goals to be achieved and the project objectives where the simulation models are deployed. This is especially intensified when different product parts and components on different levels withn the supply networks are included into one model, like production lines and work centers within existing and emerging factory shop floors combined with the network of suppliers and additionally flavoured with the ramp up of new products, new work centers or both. Very often the complexity is increased due to the organizational nature of production types and different project groups with own modelling paradigms. This is particularly a characteristic of supply networks that deliver very complex commodity products like whole power plants or respective components. The usual foundation to describe and model such complex systems is the data around the three principal consisting domains (PPR): Products to be delivered (raw-materials, parts, components, finished products), Processes that produce them (from supply chain steps down to operational steps) and Resources necessary to acomplish the work (suppliers, factories, production lines, work centers, machines, etc.). Yet the data is not enough to build the simulation model that, following the paradigm of digital twin, also represents its behaviour as well as the interdependencies between the consisting elements within the PPR-Domains. These interactions, behaviours, and cause-and-effect graphs are usually embodied as a procedural programming, affecting the scope and the depth of the modelled logic and therewith they influence the abstraction levels within the model. The situation is even more complex, in a case when the simulation models represent a workshop-like production and the same simulation model is intended to be deployed for various factories and different products within one big and multifaceted company like Siemens Energy. In opposite of the typical assembly lines like in automotive or electronics industry, here we are talking about product and respective parts and components that are running through different resources in an arbitrary sequence defined by product features and manufactruing technologies available in the considered factories or within the supply network.\",\"PeriodicalId\":330615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings ASIM SST 2020\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings ASIM SST 2020\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11128/arep.59.a59004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings ASIM SST 2020","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11128/arep.59.a59004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

离散事件仿真(DES)模型在工厂和供应网络规划和优化中的应用具有模型结构的不同抽象层次和粒度的特点。这两个方面取决于要模拟的系统的复杂性、要实现的业务目标和部署模拟模型的项目目标。当供应网络中不同层次的不同产品部件和组件被包括在一个模型中时,这一点尤其突出,例如现有和新兴工厂车间中的生产线和工作中心与供应商网络相结合,并额外增加新产品,新工作中心或两者的增加。通常,由于产品类型的组织性质和具有自己建模范例的不同项目组,复杂性会增加。这是供应网络的一个特别特点,它提供非常复杂的商品产品,如整个发电厂或各自的组件。描述和建模此类复杂系统的通常基础是围绕三个主要组成域(PPR)的数据:要交付的产品(原材料、零件、组件、成品)、生产它们的过程(从供应链步骤到操作步骤)和完成工作所需的资源(供应商、工厂、生产线、工作中心、机器等)。然而,这些数据不足以建立仿真模型,该模型遵循数字孪生范式,也代表其行为以及ppr域中组成元素之间的相互依赖关系。这些交互、行为和因果图通常被具体化为过程编程,影响建模逻辑的范围和深度,从而影响模型中的抽象层次。如果仿真模型代表一个类似车间的生产,而同一个仿真模型打算部署到像西门子能源这样一家多面公司的各个工厂和不同的产品中,情况就更加复杂了。与汽车或电子行业的典型装配线相反,这里我们谈论的是产品和各自的零部件,它们以任意顺序通过不同的资源运行,这些资源由所考虑的工厂或供应网络中可用的产品特性和制造技术定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Generative and Modular Simulation Models for Supply and Manufacturing Networks
The application of Discrete-Event Simulation (DES) models for purposes of planning and optimization of factories and supply networks is characterized with various abstraction levels and granularities of the model structure. These two aspects are dependent on the complexity of the systems to be simulated, the business goals to be achieved and the project objectives where the simulation models are deployed. This is especially intensified when different product parts and components on different levels withn the supply networks are included into one model, like production lines and work centers within existing and emerging factory shop floors combined with the network of suppliers and additionally flavoured with the ramp up of new products, new work centers or both. Very often the complexity is increased due to the organizational nature of production types and different project groups with own modelling paradigms. This is particularly a characteristic of supply networks that deliver very complex commodity products like whole power plants or respective components. The usual foundation to describe and model such complex systems is the data around the three principal consisting domains (PPR): Products to be delivered (raw-materials, parts, components, finished products), Processes that produce them (from supply chain steps down to operational steps) and Resources necessary to acomplish the work (suppliers, factories, production lines, work centers, machines, etc.). Yet the data is not enough to build the simulation model that, following the paradigm of digital twin, also represents its behaviour as well as the interdependencies between the consisting elements within the PPR-Domains. These interactions, behaviours, and cause-and-effect graphs are usually embodied as a procedural programming, affecting the scope and the depth of the modelled logic and therewith they influence the abstraction levels within the model. The situation is even more complex, in a case when the simulation models represent a workshop-like production and the same simulation model is intended to be deployed for various factories and different products within one big and multifaceted company like Siemens Energy. In opposite of the typical assembly lines like in automotive or electronics industry, here we are talking about product and respective parts and components that are running through different resources in an arbitrary sequence defined by product features and manufactruing technologies available in the considered factories or within the supply network.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信