国际法治:国际强制管辖的需要与追求

A. Augusto, Cançado Trindade
{"title":"国际法治:国际强制管辖的需要与追求","authors":"A. Augusto, Cançado Trindade","doi":"10.1163/9789004255074_027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most of the classic works on international adjudication date from a time when one counted only on, besides the Permanent Court of Arbitration and international arbitral tribunals, the Hague Court the Permanent Court of International Justice [PCIJ] followed by the International Court of Justice [ICJ]. The system of the 1982 U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea allows States Parties to the Convention the option between the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, or the ICJ, or else arbitration. This is symptomatic of the way contemporary International Law has evolved, and of an increasing recourse to international adjudication. One can detect the current process of humanization of International Law, disclosing a new outlook of the relations between public power and human being. In operating, and constructing the converging case-law, the European and the Inter-American Courts, have contributed to enrich and humanize contemporary Public International Law.Keywords: American; European; Hague Court; International Court of Justice [ICJ]; International Law; Jurisdiction; Law of the Sea; Permanent Court of International Justice [PCIJ]","PeriodicalId":347946,"journal":{"name":"International Law for Humankind","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International Rule of Law: The Need and Quest for International Compulsory Jurisdiction\",\"authors\":\"A. Augusto, Cançado Trindade\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789004255074_027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Most of the classic works on international adjudication date from a time when one counted only on, besides the Permanent Court of Arbitration and international arbitral tribunals, the Hague Court the Permanent Court of International Justice [PCIJ] followed by the International Court of Justice [ICJ]. The system of the 1982 U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea allows States Parties to the Convention the option between the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, or the ICJ, or else arbitration. This is symptomatic of the way contemporary International Law has evolved, and of an increasing recourse to international adjudication. One can detect the current process of humanization of International Law, disclosing a new outlook of the relations between public power and human being. In operating, and constructing the converging case-law, the European and the Inter-American Courts, have contributed to enrich and humanize contemporary Public International Law.Keywords: American; European; Hague Court; International Court of Justice [ICJ]; International Law; Jurisdiction; Law of the Sea; Permanent Court of International Justice [PCIJ]\",\"PeriodicalId\":347946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Law for Humankind\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Law for Humankind\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004255074_027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Law for Humankind","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004255074_027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大多数关于国际仲裁的经典著作的年代,除了常设仲裁法院和国际仲裁法庭之外,还有海牙法院、常设国际法院(PCIJ),其次是国际法院(ICJ)。1982年《联合国海洋法公约》的体系允许《公约》缔约国在国际海洋法法庭(ICJ)或其他仲裁之间进行选择。这是当代国际法演变方式的征兆,也是越来越多地诉诸国际裁决的征兆。从中可以窥见当前国际法人格化的进程,揭示公权力与人的关系的新视角。欧洲法院和美洲法院在运作和构建趋同判例法的过程中,为当代国际公法的丰富和人性化作出了贡献。关键词:美国;欧洲;海牙法院;国际法院[j];国际法;管辖;海洋法;常设国际法院
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
International Rule of Law: The Need and Quest for International Compulsory Jurisdiction
Most of the classic works on international adjudication date from a time when one counted only on, besides the Permanent Court of Arbitration and international arbitral tribunals, the Hague Court the Permanent Court of International Justice [PCIJ] followed by the International Court of Justice [ICJ]. The system of the 1982 U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea allows States Parties to the Convention the option between the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, or the ICJ, or else arbitration. This is symptomatic of the way contemporary International Law has evolved, and of an increasing recourse to international adjudication. One can detect the current process of humanization of International Law, disclosing a new outlook of the relations between public power and human being. In operating, and constructing the converging case-law, the European and the Inter-American Courts, have contributed to enrich and humanize contemporary Public International Law.Keywords: American; European; Hague Court; International Court of Justice [ICJ]; International Law; Jurisdiction; Law of the Sea; Permanent Court of International Justice [PCIJ]
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信