广域网环境下OpenSSH与OpenVPN之间的三层隧道性能评估与分析

Irfaan Coonjah, P. C. Catherine, M. S. Soyjaudah
{"title":"广域网环境下OpenSSH与OpenVPN之间的三层隧道性能评估与分析","authors":"Irfaan Coonjah, P. C. Catherine, M. S. Soyjaudah","doi":"10.1109/CCCS.2015.7374130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) provide a secure encrypted communication between remote networks worldwide by using Internet Protocol(IP) tunnels and a shared medium like the Internet. End-to-end connectivity is established by tunneling. OpenVPN and OpenSSH are cross-platform, secure, highly configurable VPN solutions. The performance comparison however between OpenVPN and OpenSSH VPN has not yet been undertaken. This paper focuses on such comparison and evaluates the efficiency of these VPNs over Wide Area Network (WAN) connections. The same conditions are maintained for a fair comparison. To the best knowledge of the authors, this is the first reported test results of these two commonly used VPN technologies. Three parameters, namely speed, latency and jitter are evaluated. Using a real life scenario with deployment over the Linux Operating System, a comprehensive in-depth comparative analysis of the VPN mechanisms is provided. Results of the analysis between OpenSSH and OpenVPN show that OpenSSH utilizes better the link and significantly improves transfer times.","PeriodicalId":300052,"journal":{"name":"2015 International Conference on Computing, Communication and Security (ICCCS)","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance evaluation and analysis of layer 3 tunneling between OpenSSH and OpenVPN in a wide area network environment\",\"authors\":\"Irfaan Coonjah, P. C. Catherine, M. S. Soyjaudah\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CCCS.2015.7374130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) provide a secure encrypted communication between remote networks worldwide by using Internet Protocol(IP) tunnels and a shared medium like the Internet. End-to-end connectivity is established by tunneling. OpenVPN and OpenSSH are cross-platform, secure, highly configurable VPN solutions. The performance comparison however between OpenVPN and OpenSSH VPN has not yet been undertaken. This paper focuses on such comparison and evaluates the efficiency of these VPNs over Wide Area Network (WAN) connections. The same conditions are maintained for a fair comparison. To the best knowledge of the authors, this is the first reported test results of these two commonly used VPN technologies. Three parameters, namely speed, latency and jitter are evaluated. Using a real life scenario with deployment over the Linux Operating System, a comprehensive in-depth comparative analysis of the VPN mechanisms is provided. Results of the analysis between OpenSSH and OpenVPN show that OpenSSH utilizes better the link and significantly improves transfer times.\",\"PeriodicalId\":300052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 International Conference on Computing, Communication and Security (ICCCS)\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 International Conference on Computing, Communication and Security (ICCCS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCCS.2015.7374130\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 International Conference on Computing, Communication and Security (ICCCS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCCS.2015.7374130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

虚拟专用网(vpn)通过使用因特网协议(IP)隧道和像因特网这样的共享媒介,在世界范围内的远程网络之间提供安全的加密通信。端到端连接是通过隧道建立的。OpenVPN和OpenSSH是跨平台、安全、高度可配置的VPN解决方案。然而,OpenVPN和OpenSSH VPN之间的性能比较尚未进行。本文着重于这种比较,并评估这些vpn在广域网(WAN)连接上的效率。保持相同的条件是为了进行公平的比较。据作者所知,这是第一次报道这两种常用VPN技术的测试结果。评估了三个参数,即速度、延迟和抖动。通过在Linux操作系统上进行部署的实际场景,对VPN机制进行了全面深入的比较分析。OpenSSH和OpenVPN的分析结果表明,OpenSSH更好地利用了链路,并显著提高了传输时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance evaluation and analysis of layer 3 tunneling between OpenSSH and OpenVPN in a wide area network environment
Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) provide a secure encrypted communication between remote networks worldwide by using Internet Protocol(IP) tunnels and a shared medium like the Internet. End-to-end connectivity is established by tunneling. OpenVPN and OpenSSH are cross-platform, secure, highly configurable VPN solutions. The performance comparison however between OpenVPN and OpenSSH VPN has not yet been undertaken. This paper focuses on such comparison and evaluates the efficiency of these VPNs over Wide Area Network (WAN) connections. The same conditions are maintained for a fair comparison. To the best knowledge of the authors, this is the first reported test results of these two commonly used VPN technologies. Three parameters, namely speed, latency and jitter are evaluated. Using a real life scenario with deployment over the Linux Operating System, a comprehensive in-depth comparative analysis of the VPN mechanisms is provided. Results of the analysis between OpenSSH and OpenVPN show that OpenSSH utilizes better the link and significantly improves transfer times.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信