三种不同应用对罗库溴铵注射疼痛的影响:一项双盲、随机临床研究。

Z. Arslan, M. Naldan, F. Karakoç, M. Aktaş, S. Çelik
{"title":"三种不同应用对罗库溴铵注射疼痛的影响:一项双盲、随机临床研究。","authors":"Z. Arslan, M. Naldan, F. Karakoç, M. Aktaş, S. Çelik","doi":"10.7727/wimj.2015.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nSome agents such as rocuronium and propofol induce severe and noxious pain when administered intravenously during anaesthesia induction. This causes additional stress for the patient due to operation. The purpose of our study, was to compare the effects of remifentanyl with two different administration methods and lidocaine on rocuronium injection pain.\n\n\nMethods\nThis prospective, double blind, randomized study is designed with 120 patients' aged 17 and 70 years old American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II, undergoing different elective surgery types that require muscle relaxation. Patients were randomly distributed to three Groups; Group 1 (remifentanyl-bandaged, n = 40), Group 2 (lidocaine-bandaged, n = 40) and Group 3 (remifentanyl non-bandaged, n = 40). Mean arterial pressure and pulse rate were recorded before induction, one minute after induction and intubation. An independent anaesthetist blind to groups assessed and recorded verbal rating scale.\n\n\nResults\nThere were no significant differences between groups regarding demographic variables. Cardiovascular haemodynamics regarding mean arterial pressure and pulse did not change significantly between groups before and after induction and after intubation. Pain scores were comparable between groups.\n\n\nConclusion\nRemifentanyl can be used either with venous occlusion or as intravenous bolus to prevent rocuronium-induced pain with no significant difference and it is as effective as lidocaine.","PeriodicalId":104133,"journal":{"name":"The West Indian medical journal","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Three Different Applications on Rocuronium Injection Pain: A Double Blinded, Randomized Clinical Study.\",\"authors\":\"Z. Arslan, M. Naldan, F. Karakoç, M. Aktaş, S. Çelik\",\"doi\":\"10.7727/wimj.2015.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background\\nSome agents such as rocuronium and propofol induce severe and noxious pain when administered intravenously during anaesthesia induction. This causes additional stress for the patient due to operation. The purpose of our study, was to compare the effects of remifentanyl with two different administration methods and lidocaine on rocuronium injection pain.\\n\\n\\nMethods\\nThis prospective, double blind, randomized study is designed with 120 patients' aged 17 and 70 years old American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II, undergoing different elective surgery types that require muscle relaxation. Patients were randomly distributed to three Groups; Group 1 (remifentanyl-bandaged, n = 40), Group 2 (lidocaine-bandaged, n = 40) and Group 3 (remifentanyl non-bandaged, n = 40). Mean arterial pressure and pulse rate were recorded before induction, one minute after induction and intubation. An independent anaesthetist blind to groups assessed and recorded verbal rating scale.\\n\\n\\nResults\\nThere were no significant differences between groups regarding demographic variables. Cardiovascular haemodynamics regarding mean arterial pressure and pulse did not change significantly between groups before and after induction and after intubation. Pain scores were comparable between groups.\\n\\n\\nConclusion\\nRemifentanyl can be used either with venous occlusion or as intravenous bolus to prevent rocuronium-induced pain with no significant difference and it is as effective as lidocaine.\",\"PeriodicalId\":104133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The West Indian medical journal\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The West Indian medical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7727/wimj.2015.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The West Indian medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7727/wimj.2015.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:一些药物如罗库溴铵和异丙酚在麻醉诱导过程中静脉给药会引起严重的剧痛。由于手术,这给病人带来了额外的压力。本研究的目的是比较两种给药方式的瑞芬太尼和利多卡因对罗库溴铵注射疼痛的影响。方法本前瞻性、双盲、随机研究设计120例患者,年龄分别为17岁和70岁,美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状态为I-II级,接受不同的选择性手术类型,需要肌肉放松。患者随机分为三组;组1(瑞芬太尼包扎,n = 40)、组2(利多卡因包扎,n = 40)、组3(瑞芬太尼不包扎,n = 40)。分别记录诱导前、诱导后1分钟和插管后的平均动脉压和脉搏率。一名独立的麻醉师对分组进行评估并记录口头评定量表。结果组间人口学变量差异无统计学意义。诱导前后及插管后各组间平均动脉压、脉搏等心血管血流动力学无明显变化。组间疼痛评分具有可比性。结论雷米芬太尼与静脉闭塞或静脉注射均可预防罗库溴铵引起的疼痛,两者疗效无显著差异,且与利多卡因效果相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of Three Different Applications on Rocuronium Injection Pain: A Double Blinded, Randomized Clinical Study.
Background Some agents such as rocuronium and propofol induce severe and noxious pain when administered intravenously during anaesthesia induction. This causes additional stress for the patient due to operation. The purpose of our study, was to compare the effects of remifentanyl with two different administration methods and lidocaine on rocuronium injection pain. Methods This prospective, double blind, randomized study is designed with 120 patients' aged 17 and 70 years old American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II, undergoing different elective surgery types that require muscle relaxation. Patients were randomly distributed to three Groups; Group 1 (remifentanyl-bandaged, n = 40), Group 2 (lidocaine-bandaged, n = 40) and Group 3 (remifentanyl non-bandaged, n = 40). Mean arterial pressure and pulse rate were recorded before induction, one minute after induction and intubation. An independent anaesthetist blind to groups assessed and recorded verbal rating scale. Results There were no significant differences between groups regarding demographic variables. Cardiovascular haemodynamics regarding mean arterial pressure and pulse did not change significantly between groups before and after induction and after intubation. Pain scores were comparable between groups. Conclusion Remifentanyl can be used either with venous occlusion or as intravenous bolus to prevent rocuronium-induced pain with no significant difference and it is as effective as lidocaine.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信